The way to answer sufficient assumption questions is to arrange the evidence, find the gap, and add a new premise that lets you draw the conclusion. Here, conditional logic is key, but this will not always be the case. What is sufficient assumption LSAT? Sufficient assumption questions contain an argument that is, by itself, not fully complete.
What is a sufficient assumption question?
Sufficient assumption questions contain an argument that is, by itself, not fully complete. Unless we add more to the argument, it’s not going to be fully valid. You’ll see this in the examples we use.
What are common LSAT LR sufficient assumption questions?
Here’s a look at common LSAT LR sufficient assumption question prompts: The conclusion follows logically from the premises if which one of the following is assumed The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed? The conclusion of the argument is properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed? Alright.
How do you spot a sufficient assumption?
The big key is that you understand what a sufficient assumption is and how it differs from necessary assumptions. This way, you can spot a sufficient assumption and mark down the correct answer quickly. In today’s lesson, we are going to do something a little different than usual.
How do you approach an assumption question?
1:264:20How Should I Approach Necessary Assumption Questions? - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipQuestion it's not about filling in the missing. Piece on a necessary assumption. Question it's justMoreQuestion it's not about filling in the missing. Piece on a necessary assumption. Question it's just simply which one does the author have to agree with. And uh you would not be wrong.
What is the difference between necessary and sufficient assumption?
A sufficient assumption is an assumption that, if true, would make the whole argument totally valid. A necessary assumption is an assumption that needs to be true in order for the conclusion to be possible.
How do you calculate necessary assumptions?
To determine whether a choice is a necessary assumption, suppose that the choice were false: If the argument falls apart when you do so—that is, the conclusion no longer follows logically from the support—then that choice is the answer.
Can an assumption be a question?
By contrast, Assumption questions require you to identify a statement upon which the conclusion depends, i.e. a statement without which the conclusion wouldn't make any sense. Typical Assumption question stems include: “Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?”
What is a sufficient assumption?
This question asks you to identify a sufficient assumption—that is, an assumption that, if added to the argument, would make it logically valid. We're looking for something that would fix all of an argument's problems, bridging the gap between what the support justifies and what the conclusion claims.
What words or phrases indicate a necessary assumption question stem a sufficient assumption stem?
Solving for Necessary Assumption If this were a necessary assumption question, the question stem would include words like “relies,” “depends,” “requires,” etc., indicating that the answer choice MUST BE THERE for the author to draw a conclusion.
What is an example of an assumption?
An assumption is something that you assume to be the case, even without proof. For example, people might make the assumption that you're a nerd if you wear glasses, even though that's not true.
How do you negate necessary assumptions?
Re: Negation for Necessary Assumption Questions If the sentence says: Some people don't eat chicken, it inherently implies that some people do. So negating it as "Some people do eat chicken" doesn't actually change the meaning. The negation would be ALL people eat chicken, because it's the logical opposite.
What are the types of assumptions?
They make four key assumptions: ontological, epistemological, axiological, and methodological assumptions.
Is a question the same as an assumption?
Takeaway: Strengthen questions and Assumption questions are not identical. In a Strengthen question, we want a strong answer choice that will make a conclusion more likely. In an Assumption question we want a soft answer that is indisputable based on how the premises lead to the conclusion.
Why is it important to evaluate assumptions in arguments?
In an argument, an assumption is a premise that is not explicitly (directly) stated. These unstated premises are very important since the validity of an argument is determined by the validity of its assumptions. Assumptions are the missing links of arguments.
Why do we need assumptions?
Assumptions are the foci for any theory and thus any paradigm. It is also important that assumptions are made explicit, and that the number of assumptions is sufficient to describe the phenomenon at hand. Explication of assumptions is even more crucial in research methods used to test the theories.
PREMISES
If no budget for more dairy insp --> most large dairies won't meet fed stds on waste disposal
CONCLUSION
Looking at our premises, we have one fact and one conditional.
CONCLUSION
Now, we need a Sufficient Assumption to guarantee that the argument works. Often, sufficient assumptions follow the classic pattern of:
How do we recognize Sufficient Assumption questions?
These questions ask you to identify assumptions that would tie arguments together.
How to find a sufficient assumption?
If you add a statement in a choice to the argument’s support and the conclusion becomes guaranteed , then you’ve found a sufficient assumption!
Why do people oppose the city art commission?
City councilperson: Many city residents oppose the city art commission's proposed purchase of an unusual stone edifice, on the grounds that art critics are divided over whether the edifice really qualifies as art. But I argue that the purpose of art is to cause experts to debate ideas, including ideas about what constitutes art itself. Since the edifice has caused experts to debate what constitutes art itself, it does qualify as art.
What is the next step in a sufficient assumption?
A good next step is to look for a gap between conclusion and support. Gaps are often present in Sufficient Assumption questions, since our task is to fill that gap in with a claim to cement the path from support to conclusion.
What should the council try to avoid?
The council should try to avoid an outcome in which the city’s voter’s decide the proposal. Top tip: The power of prediction. It’s generally easier to predict a sufficient assumption before looking at the choices than it is to predict a necessary assumption. The gap tends to be more visible to readers.
How long does it take to eliminate wrong choice?
Short on time? Try to eliminate choices, then guess If a question seems too daunting to tackle in the allotted time, consider taking 30-60 seconds to try to eliminate any classic wrong choice types for this question type (irrelevant, too weak, backwards), and any choices that don’t contain key concepts from the conclusion and the evidence.
Why should someone vote no to the proposal?
The arguer’s conclusion is that someone should vote no to the proposal. Why? Because the only alternative—everyone abstaining—would defer the decision to the voters.
What is sufficient assumption?
This question asks you to identify a sufficient assumption—that is, an assumption that, if added to the argument, would make it logically valid. We’re looking for something that would fix all of an argument’s problems, bridging the gap between what the support justifies and what the conclusion claims.
Why is it best to make a prediction on Sufficient Assumption questions?
It’s best to make a prediction on Sufficient Assumption questions, to save time in the choices and make the tempting choices look less tempting.
What is not enough in a statement?
Not enough: Statements that do help, but not enough to guarantee the conclusion following from its support . Necessary assumptions: Assumptions that are necessary but not sufficient to guarantee the result. Not relevant: Information that’s outside of the argument's scope, and thus unable to connect the support to its conclusion.
Can you be confused when evaluating arguments?
Yes, you will quickly come to notice how easily they can be confused when evaluating arguments. Many wrong answer choices will include a switch up of sufficient and necessary assumptions (ie. you are looking for a necessary assumption and a wrong choice gives you a sufficient assumption, or vice vera).