how many jurors were there in 12 angry men

What is the plot of 12 Angry Men?

You could probably summarize the plot of 12 Angry Men as: "Herding cats… with life and death at stake." That's right: this is the story of one jury that just can't decide on a verdict. That's right: this is the story of one jury that just can't decide on a verdict.

Is there racism in 12 Angry Men?

Yes, it’s depressing that ordinary white men from a black-and-white film released more than a half century ago have a more nuanced and progressive attitude toward racism than the majority of voters in 2016—in a handful of swing states, anyway. But the passionate conviction of 12 Angry Men is inspiring as well.

Was Justice served in the film 12 Angry Men?

Yes, Justice was served throughout the film Twelve Angry Men. Recognizing the importance of the character “Juror 8”, without him, however, the answer would have been different but the way he persuaded other juror to change their paradigm of thinking is worth praising.

Who is the antagonist in '12 Angry Men'?

~ Juror 3 trying to convince the others to declare a vote for 'guilty'. Juror 3 is the third of twelve jury members and the main antagonist in the teleplay and movie 12 Angry Men . He was portrayed by the late Lee J. Cobb in the 1957 film, and by the late George C. Scott in the 1997 TV film.

What are the jurors names in 12 Angry Men?

Juror #8Henry FondaJuror #3Lee J. CobbJuror #10Ed BegleyJuror #4E.G. MarshallJuror #9Joseph SweeneyJuror #5Jack Klugman12 Angry Men/Characters

Why are there no female jurors 12 Angry Men?

The reason is simple; in 1954, when the play was written, women weren't allowed to serve on a jury (a right that came 19 years later). Over the weekend, hundreds of women honored those who came before them and were denied this right by performing “12 Angry Men” with entirely female casts.

How many of the jurors in 12 Angry Men would have to vote guilty for a conviction?

But the longer he talks, the more the men realize that he's trying to convince them to change their minds. Eventually, Juror #8 gives up and says that he'll go with a Guilty verdict if all eleven other jurors vote Guilty again. The vote goes around the room and this time, only ten vote for Guilty.

Who is the 3rd juror in 12 Angry Men?

Lee J. CobbCobb)

Who is the 9th juror in 12 Angry Men?

12 Angry Men Juror #9 (Joseph Sweeny)

Are all the jurors in 12 Angry Men white?

This question was explored in our production of Twelve Angry Men, wherein half the jurors were played by white men and the other half were played by black men. Little by little, the audience saw how each juror brought his own biases to the courtroom and how those biases affected the verdict.

Who was the last juror to vote in 12 Angry Men?

Juror 3Juror 3 was the last to change his vote. His stubbornness to change his decision from guilty to not guilty appears early in the play.

Why did Juror 8 change his vote?

Juror 8 points his prejudice out when he says "You want to see this boy die because you personally want it—not because of the facts." This causes Juror 3 to break down and eventually change his vote to not guilty.

Did Juror 3 change his vote?

Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.

Why is Juror 8 the hero?

By the end of the movie, Juror #8 has proven himself to be a true hero for standing by his principles and having the courage and skill to put them to work. He eventually gets the jury to find the defendant Not Guilty, and in the process, he avoids sending an innocent 18 year-old kid to jail.

Why is Juror 3 biased?

Juror #3 is very biased towards the accused teenager, and that is because his own son had once hit him on the jaw and had run away from home at the age of 15.

Why does Juror 4 Change His verdict?

He even says, after one of Juror #10's racist rants, "Now, sit down and don't open your mouth again." And when push comes to shove, he changes his mind about his verdict because he realizes he missed the fact that one of the witnesses was not wearing her glasses when she apparently saw the murder.

What does Juror 4 represent?

Juror Four is the least emotional of the jurors to the point that he looks down at the emotional responses of some of the jurors. He is smart, successful, and logical. He is not concerned about feelings as much as a matter-of-fact look at the evidence.

Why did Juror 7 change his vote?

Juror 7 is also shown to be ethnocentric and xenophobic when he insults the immigrant Juror 11. When Juror 7 switches his vote to "Not guilty" because he had enough, the immigrant Juror 11 gets mad and humiliates Juror 7, telling him that he has no right to play like this with the man's life.

What is Juror 9s name?

Joseph Sweeney: Juror 9.

What does Juror 10 represent?

Juror #10: An angry, bitter man who antagonizes almost at sight, Juror #10 is also a bigot who places no values on any human life except his own. He is a man who has been nowhere and is going nowhere, and he knows it deep within him.

What did Juror 11 do?

Finding His Voice Juror 11 decides to challenge Juror 7: ''What kind of man are you? You have sat here and voted guilty with everyone else because there are some theater tickets burning a hole in your pocket. Now you have changed your vote for the same reason.

Why did Juror 6 change his vote?

When the timing of the downstairs neighbor's testimony does not seem to make sense considering the witness's failing health, Juror 6 accepts that there is reasonable doubt as to whether the witness actually saw the defendant or just heard someone and assumed it was the defendant and changes his vote to not guilty.

Who is the oldest juror in 12 Angry Men?

As the jurors enter the room, it's evident that Juror 9 is the oldest of the group. Even without saying anything, most readers and viewers will have assumptions about Juror 9 because of his age.

What was the name of Juror #8?

Juror 8 (Davis) is the eighth of the twelve jury members and the main protagonist in the teleplay and movie 12 Angry Men.

Why were there only men in 12 Angry Men?

The film came out in 1957 which was the same year that women were given the right to be on federal juries in the The Civil Rights Act of 1957. The script was written in 1954 and the setting of New York did not allow women on federal juries until 1968 so that is why all of the jurors are male.

What was the problem with the jury room in 12 Angry Men?

Twelve men are confined to a deliberation room after the trial of a 19-year-old boy accused of stabbing and killing his father. Twelve Angry Men illustrates the many dangers of the jury system like, a biased jury, being left with questions, and feeling inconvenienced by jury duty.

How does the setting of 12 Angry Men affect the jurors?

Lesson Summary The jury room is sparsely furnished with only a table, chairs, a water cooler, and a fan. The heat in the jury room is oppressive and is intended to reflect the anger and frustration of the jurors.

What is the purpose of the 12 person jury in 12 Angry Men?

12 Angry Jurors is a play that contemplates the huge responsibility of 12 ordinary people as they consider the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of murder. The 12 jurors bring their own histories, prejudices, and biases to the jury room as they work through this life or death decision.

Why is Juror 11 so shy?

Juror #11. As a refugee from Europe, Juror #11 has witnessed great injustices. That is why he is intent on administering justice as a jury member. He sometimes feels self-conscious about his foreign accent, but overcomes his shyness and is willing to take on a more active part in the decision-making process.

What happens if a defendant is found guilty?

The defendant, if found guilty, would receive a mandatory death penalty. Before any formal discussion, the jury casts a vote. Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.”. Only one juror votes “not guilty.”.

What does Juror 8 want to discuss in an electric chair?

A guilty verdict will result in the electric chair; therefore, Juror #8 wants to discuss the relevance of the witness testimony. He is convinced that there is reasonable doubt and eventually succeeds in persuading the other jurors to acquit the defendant.

What does Juror 7 admit to doing?

A slick, superior, and sometimes obnoxious salesman, Juror #7 admits during Act One that he would have done anything to miss jury duty and is trying to get out of it as fast as possible. He represents the many real-life individuals who loathe the idea of being on a jury.

How many jurors vote guilty in the play?

Eleven of the jurors vote “guilty.”. Only one juror votes “not guilty.”. That juror, who is known in the script as Juror #8, is the protagonist of the play. As tempers flare and the arguments begin, the audience learns about each member of the jury.

Why is the progressive look at the cast important?

This progressive look at the cast is important for the final outcome of the play, as one juror after another changes their mind about the verdict.

What is the role of Juror #1?

Non-confrontational, Juror #1 serves as the foreman of the jury. He is serious about his authoritative role and wants to be as fair as possible. Despite being described as "not overly bright," he helps calm down the tensions and moves the conversation onward with professional urgency.

What happened to Juror 7?

Juror 7 half-heartedly changes his vote, leading to an inquisition by Juror 11. Under duress Juror 7 sloppily says he thinks the boy is not guilty. After another vote, Jurors 12 and 1 also change their votes, leaving only three guilty votes. Juror 10 erupts in vitriol regarding the defendant's ethnicity.

Why can't he vote guilty?

He says he cannot vote guilty because reasonable doubt exists. With his arguments seemingly failing to convince any of the other jurors, Juror 8 suggests a secret ballot, from which he will abstain; if all the other jurors still vote guilty, he will acquiesce. The ballot reveals one not guilty vote.

What is the jury room in New York?

In the overheated jury room of the New York County Courthouse, a jury prepares to deliberate the case of an 18-year-old impoverished youth accused of stabbing his father to death. The judge instructs them that if there is any reasonable doubt, the jurors are to return a verdict of not guilty; if found guilty, the defendant will receive a death sentence. The verdict must be unanimous.

What year was 12 angry men?

12 Angry Men (1957 film) 12 Angry Men. (1957 film) 12 Angry Men is a 1957 American courtroom drama film directed by Sidney Lumet, adapted from a 1954 teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. The film tells the story of a jury of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of an 18-year old defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, ...

What is the name of the movie that Amy Schumer parodied?

In 2015, the Comedy Central TV series Inside Amy Schumer aired a half-hour parody of the film titled "12 Angry Men Inside Amy Schumer". The BBC Television comedy Hancock's Half Hour, starring Tony Hancock and Sid James, and written by Ray Galton and Alan Simpson, was parodied in the episode broadcast on October 16, 1959.

Why did Sonia Sotomayor watch 12 angry men?

Speaking at a screening of the film during the 2010 Fordham University Law School Film festival, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that seeing 12 Angry Men while she was in college influenced her decision to pursue a career in law. She was particularly inspired by immigrant Juror 11's monologue on his reverence for the American justice system. She also told the audience of law students that, as a lower-court judge, she would sometimes instruct juries to not follow the film's example, because most of the jurors' conclusions are based on speculation, not fact. Sotomayor noted that events such as Juror 8 entering a similar knife into the proceeding; performing outside research into the case matter in the first place; and ultimately the jury as a whole making broad, wide-ranging assumptions far beyond the scope of reasonable doubt (such as the inferences regarding the woman wearing glasses) would not be allowed in a real-life jury situation, and would in fact have yielded a mistrial (assuming, of course, that applicable law permitted the content of jury deliberations to be revealed).

Why are cameras positioned above eye level?

At the beginning of the film, the cameras are positioned above eye level and mounted with wide-angle lenses, to give the appearance of greater depth between subjects, but as the film progresses the focal length of the lenses is gradually increased. By the end of the film, nearly everyone is shown in closeup, using telephoto lenses from a lower angle, which decreases or "shortens" depth of field. Lumet stated that his intention in using these techniques with cinematographer Boris Kaufman was to create a nearly palpable claustrophobia.

What would have happened if juror 8 did not stand up?

If it was not for the brave actions of juror 8 in standing up and pointing out “he is not your son” then a verdict would have been reached based on the jurors own personal conflicts expressing with it an underlying weakness of the American jury system and community perspective. There are many individual aspects that add to the pros and cons of the 1950s American jury system. These are shown subtly through 12 angry men’s contrasting personalities and the process in which t they come to their decision.

What is the theme of Twelve Angry Men?

Twelve Angry Men exposes the weaknesses of the jury system as well as its strengths – The Jurors within Twelve Angry Men portray individual aspects of a 1950s American culture, all with their own take on the American Jury system. The closed minded, sheep like attitudes of the Jurors illustrates the McCathic mentality of the public which directly reflects the weaknesses within the American Jury system.

What is individuality in jury?

A juror’s individuality is a clear fault in the American jury system as the truth or the facts are never the same in the mind of another. With individuality also come strengths.

What evidence does 8# bring forward?

With a string of evidence that 8# slowly brings forward such as the replica murder weapon and the re-enactment of the neighbours shuffle to the front door to become an eye witness to the killers escape each juror sheds a different light on the events. After gaining the trust of one elder the others follow ‘it’s not easy to stand along’ and yet juror 8# shows the view of the minority in his refusal to be intimidated with the majorities McCathic method and the subtle backing of a wise old man, together shows the strength that one can have on the judicial system and the outcome of a very serious case.

Do jurors believe they were cheating?

Hire writer. None of the jurors believe they were cheating the accused out of a fair trial or had any initial doubt in their minds that he was guilty and yet as the case is further picked apart each juror finds a point of clarity in the unravelling of evidence and a better understanding of the term reasonable doubt.

What is the purpose of 12 angry jurors?

12 Angry Jurors is a play that contemplates the huge responsibility of 12 ordinary people as they consider the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of murder. The 12 jurors bring their own histories, prejudices, and biases to the jury room as they work through this life or death decision. In the year of George Floyd and countless others, this play works through the issues at hand in a very human way. It was originally written for men only (12 Angry Men, in a time before women could not serve jury duty. However, there have been countless productions where the cast has been entirely cast gender neutral. That is to say, any person any gender may be cast in any role within the play.

What is the meaning of the word "juror 2"?

JUROR 2— Soft spoken and tends to go with the group.

Who is the protagonist in the play Juror 8?

JUROR 8— Young. The protagonist of the play.

Is the play "Angry Men" gender neutral?

However, there have been countless productions where the cast has been entirely cast gender neutral. That is to say, any person any gender may be cast in any role within the play.

What can we learn about leadership from Juror 8?from study.com

What can we learn about leadership from Juror 8? In his calm and gentle manner, he quietly guides his fellow jurors from a hasty vote of guilty to a more thoughtful and contemplative vote of not guilty. His desire is to seek the truth and question every piece of evidence and every testimony until he is sure that he has made a clear decision. His dedication to this goal helps the others to come along with him and also desire the truth.

Why does Juror 8 change his initial vote from guilty to not guilty?from study.com

He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether.

How many votes did the jury get when the first jury poll was taken?from enotes.com

When the first juror poll is taken, Juror Eight votes "not guilty." When challenged, he just says that he doesn't think the accused is necessarily guilty or not guilty, just that he thinks a man's life is worth a little discussion. If the jury is to condemn this men as...

What does Juror 8 show?from study.com

Throughout the discussion, Juror 8 shows the false assumptions made by the evidence presented and illuminates how the testimony of several witnesses does not make sense. For example, he demonstrates how the man in the case who claimed to have heard the boy say he would kill his father could not have heard anything with the L train riding by the apartment building.

How does Juror 8 lose his cool?from study.com

The only time he loses his cool is when two of the jurors are playing a game and not taking their job seriously or when others are being treated in a cruel manner.

What is a quiet leader?from study.com

A quiet leader is one who guides people and ideas by speaking softly, presenting clear facts, and compelling people to face the truth in a situation. In 12 Angry Men, Juror 8 is such a person, calmly and patiently leading his fellow jurors to a unanimous verdict of not guilty in what seems like an uphill battle.

What does Juror 8 suggest about the evidence?from study.com

He also suggests that there are other explanations for the evidence other than the boy's guilt. For example, when everyone believes that the boy's knife is unique and that it proves he committed the crime, Juror 8 manages to purchase one exactly like it and produce it in the jury room. He also goads Juror 3 until he says he is going to kill him to show that a comment like that cannot be taken so seriously.

Overview

Plot

Cast

Themes

Production

Reception

Legal analyses

Adaptations and parodies