Full Answer
See more
Is Dostoevsky a philosophy?
Dostoyevsky's works were often called "philosophical", although he described himself as "weak in philosophy". According to Strakhov, "Fyodor Mikhailovich loved these questions about the essence of things and the limits of knowledge".
What kind of philosophy was Dostoevsky?
Existentialism is a philosophy associated with those who share the belief that philosophical thinking begins not only with the thinking subject, but the human being in its entirety. The existentialist, including Dostoevsky, put their whole being into their works.
What did Nietzsche say about Dostoevsky?
Nietzsche once described Dostoevsky as “the only person who has ever taught me anything about psychology” (Gide 168).
What did Freud think about Dostoevsky?
But, of course, Freud went right on to analyze the Russian novelist nevertheless, arguing that Dostoevsky, as do all men, desired to kill his father; when the father was in fact murdered by his serfs, not only did Dostoevsky begin to experience epileptic attacks but found the great theme of his art, culminating in “The ...
Why Dostoevsky is a genius?
And therefore, I conclusively state that Dostoevsky is a literary genius! His psychological explorations of the human mind in relation to moral questions is unparalleled. You can read his books over and over again but somehow always find new substance. Crime and Punishment is one of the best books ever.
Did Dostoevsky believe in free will?
11 Dostoevsky believes that rational egoism will fail because free will is excluded from the list of advantages offered in a rational utopia. He contends that, in a highly rational society, our freedom would become dis- torted and irrationality would be the only method to exercise free will.
Was Nietzsche LGBT?
So it should be unsurprising that no direct evidence of Nietzsche's homosexuality emerges. Still, some skepticism remains: there is no specific person with whom Köhler claims unambiguously that Nietzsche had a homosexual relationship, or with whom he longed to have one.
Did Stalin read Dostoevsky?
According to Boris Ilizarov, who has studied Stalin's copy of Dostoevsky's novel, although any dating is circumstantial, based on handwriting and on the style of notation, sometime in the mid-1930s – in 1934, perhaps, or 1935 – Stalin re-read portions of his 1927 edition of The Brothers Karamazov.
What did Hemingway say about Dostoevsky?
“In Dostoevsky there were things unbelievable and not to be believed, but some so true they changed you as you read them; frailty and madness, wickedness and saintliness, and the insanity of gambling were there to know as you knew the landscape and the roads in turgenev”
Did Leo Tolstoy know Dostoevsky?
Dostoevsky had wanted very much to meet Tolstoy, but this meeting never took place.
Is Dostoevsky better than Tolstoy?
Dostoevsky was the greatest novelist who has ever lived, with Tolstoy ranked closely the second. I've read Dostoevsky's ''Crime and Punishment", "The Idiot", "The Possessed", and his greatest 'The Brothers Karamazov", as well as some of his short stories.
Did Dostoevsky believe in nihilism?
Dostoevsky did not believe in nihilism. Crime and Punishment is designed to show the danger of such a philosophy, since Raskolnikov hurts others, including his own family, due to his belief in nihilism.
What is Dostoyevsky's relationship to philosophy?
Psychology and philosophy are closely linked in Dostoyevsky’s portrayals of intellectuals, who “feel ideas” in the depths of their souls.
What are Dostoyevsky's most famous works?
Major works and their characteristics. Dostoyevsky is best known for his novella Notes from the Underground and for four long novels, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Possessed (also and more accurately known as The Demons and The Devils ), and The Brothers Karamazov.
What is Dostoyevsky known for?
Dostoyevsky is best known for his novella Notes from the Underground and for four long novels, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, The Possessed (also and more accurately known as The Demons and The Devils ), and The Brothers Karamazov. Each of these works is famous for its psychological profundity, and, indeed, Dostoyevsky is commonly regarded as one of the greatest psychologists in the history of literature. He specialized in the analysis of pathological states of mind that lead to insanity, murder, and suicide and in the exploration of the emotions of humiliation, self-destruction, tyrannical domination, and murderous rage. These major works are also renowned as great “novels of ideas” that treat timeless and timely issues in philosophy and politics. Psychology and philosophy are closely linked in Dostoyevsky’s portrayals of intellectuals, who “feel ideas” in the depths of their souls. Finally, these novels broke new ground with their experiments in literary form.
Why is Dostoyevsky considered a prophet?
His works are often called prophetic because he so accurately predicted how Russia’s revolutionaries would behave if they came to power. In his time he was also renowned for his activity as a journalist.
What were the major events of Dostoyevsky's life?
Background and early life. The major events of Dostoyevsky’s life—mock execution, imprisonment in Siberia, and epileptic seizures —were so well known that, even apart from his work, Dostoyevsky achieved great celebrity in his own time.
When did Dostoyevsky's father become a nobleman?
In 1828 Dostoyevsky’s father managed to earn the rank of a nobleman (the reforms of Peter I the Great had made such a change in status possible). He bought an estate in 1831, and so young Fyodor spent the summer months in the country.
Was Dostoyevsky born into the landed gentry?
Subscribe Now. Unlike many other Russian writers of the first part of the 19th century, Dostoyevsky was not born into the landed gentry. He often stressed the difference between his own background and that of Leo Tolstoy or Ivan Turgenev and the effect of that difference on his work.
What changed Dostoevsky forever?
The mock-execution and the years in Siberian prison—thinly fictionalized in his novel Notes from the House of the Dead (1860)—changed Dostoevsky forever. His naive, hopeful romanticism disappeared. His religious faith deepened.
Why do prisoners lash out?
Those prisoners lash out because of their ineradicable craving to have a will of their own, and that craving is ultimately more important than their own well-being and, indeed, than life itself.
Why do people harm themselves?
In fact, people harm themselves for many reasons. They tear at their own wounds and derive a peculiar pleasure from doing so. They deliberately humiliate themselves. To their own surprise, they experience impulses stemming from resentments long suppressed and, as a result, create scandalous scenes or commit horrible crimes. Freud particularly appreciated Dostoevsky’s exploration of the dynamics of guilt. But neither Freud nor most Western readers have grasped that Dostoevsky intended his descriptions of human complexity to convey political lessons. If people are so surprising, so “undefined and mysterious,” then social engineers are bound to cause more harm than good.
How to keep people from doubting Jesus?
The only way to keep people from doubt, he tells Jesus, is by miracle, mystery (just believe us, we know), and authority, which universal empire would ensure . Only a few strong people are capable of freedom, the Inquisitor explains, so your philosophy condemns the overwhelming portion of humanity to misery.
Why are there no more adventures?
There will be no more adventures because adventures involve suspense, and suspense entails moments that are truly momentous: depending on what one does, more than one outcome is possible . But for a determinist, the laws of nature ensure that at any given moment only one thing can happen.
How to make people happy?
To make people happy, one must banish all doubt. People do not want to be presented with information that, as we would say today, contradicts their “narrative.” They will do anything to preclude unwanted facts from coming to their attention. The plot of Karamazov, in fact, turns on Ivan’s desire not to admit to himself that he desires his father’s death. Without allowing himself to realize it, he makes the wished-for murder possible. One cannot begin to understand either individual people or society unless one grasps the many forms of what might be called preventive epistemology.
What was the sentence of the Semenovsky Square?
Led to the Semenovsky Square, they heard a sentence of death by firing squad. They were given long white peasant blouses and nightcaps—their funeral shrouds—and offered last rites. The first three prisoners were seized by the arms and tied to the stake.
What is the basis of existentialist philosophy?
The basic idea of the philosophy is that individuals form the basis of philosophical thinking, and each individual is responsible for endowing life with meaning . Now we can all think of a few existentialist works off the tops of our heads – for example The Trial, The Stranger, or Waiting for Godot, but Dostoevsky started it all off in 1864 with Notes from Underground.
How many times was Dostoevsky married?
Dostoevsky was married twice (the second time after his first wife passed away in 1864), but that in no way limited his romantic liaisons. His first love affair happened before he was even married, with a woman about whom he was unsure and who then rejected his marriage proposal.
How did Dostoevsky get his start?
Dostoevsky got off to a good start, because he came from a noble family and therefore was naturally educated as a part of his youth. He didn’t train to be a writer, however; he went to a military engineering institute, even though it did not suit him. He turned to literature before he had even quit his engineering post, first by translating French works into Russian. In 1845, though, at the age of 25, he left translating for greener pastures – writing fiction. This first novel was called Poor Folk, and it has often been described as the first Russian “social novel.”
What was Dostoevsky's goal?
In the 1840s, Dostoevsky took part in a literary circle whose eventual goal was social reform . They read banned books and discussed potential social change – getting rid of censorship and serfdom, for example – at a time when these ideas were particularly terrifying for those in power, given the political atmosphere in Europe. When they were caught, they were immediately sent into a high security prison and then sentenced to death. Right before the execution was scheduled to happen, a messenger arrived with a stay from the Tsar. Instead of losing his life, Dostoevsky was sent to Omsk, Siberia, for eight years of hard labor.
Why did Dostoevsky travel to Europe?
He had often traveled in Western Europe, particularly to the German bath town of Bad Ems to be treated for his sickness.
What did Dostoevsky's parents teach him?
As previously mentioned, Dostoevsky’s parents were wealthy, and educating their children was a high priority for them. He had a nanny who began reading him old sagas and fairy tales when he was only three, and then his mother used the Bible to teach him to read and write at the age of four. His lifelong devotion to literature grew out of the foundation that his parents gave him as a child, which spanned not only the Russian greats like Alexander Pushkin, generally recognized as the father of Russian literature, but also international literary icons such as Cervantes, Goethe, and Homer.
Where was Dostoevsky sent to?
Right before the execution was scheduled to happen, a messenger arrived with a stay from the Tsar. Instead of losing his life, Dostoevsky was sent to Omsk, Siberia, for eight years of hard labor.
What is the main source of doubt in Dostoievsky?
The main source of doubt in Dostoievsky is the obvious paradox of suffering in the world and the concept of a loving God.
What is the theory of Superman?
This theory of the superman, originally created in Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, is the result of a doubt expressed in the existence of God. The theory allows Raskolnikov, without prompting, to murder two women and potentially an unborn child.
What are the rights and dignity of faith?
The dignity of the rights and dignity of faith require the recognition of two freedoms, the freedom to choose the truth and freedom in the truth …. But free goodness, which alone is true, includes freedom from evil. But if evil requires freedom is by humans that evil and suffering are produced, and therefore God can not be blamed.
Is Raskolnikov a Superman?
It is fundamentally unable to clear his sense of right and wrong, to silence his conscience. Initially, he tries to continue living, enjoying his cunning, concluding that it is a superman. Yet the humble Sonya reminds him of his act, reminds him of his guilt and therefore needs forgiveness. Dostoevsky destroyed the theory of the Superman condemning the characters involved in the mental suffering until they recognize the truth and the light of Christianity.
Who destroyed the theory of the Superman?
Dostoevsky destroyed the theory of the Superman condemning the characters involved in the mental suffering until they recognize the truth and the light of Christianity. Cite this article as: Tim, "If god does not exist everything is permitted – Dostoevsky, May 19, 2012, " in Philosophy & Philosophers, May 19, 2012, ...
Who said "Now suppose that there is no God or immortality of the soul"?
You can not have a world that is both free and good human imperfection will not allow. Dosto evsky and Superman: In a letter to N.L. Ozmidov in 1878, Dostoevsky wrote: “Now suppose that there is no God or immortality of the soul.
Is there progress in philosophy?
Chris Daly a professor of philosophy at the University of Manchester argues mostly "no" because of an "interaction effect of a cluster of things." I don't agree with the statement philosophy doesn't make progress. I think 'progress' is made when extensive technical work is done on a question, and even more so, perhaps crudely, when the question at hand is basically dropped. This might not happen when a consensus on an answer is definitely reached, but largely when its recognized that the best arguments have been made. However, I would be interested in what you use to measure whether philosophy makes progress.
Are There Any Strong Arguments Against Stoicism?
I've been interested in a criticism of stoicism but couldn't find much on the internet.
What is Dostoevsky's intention in that part of BK?
Dostoevsky's own intention in that part of BK is to critique Hegelian theodicies (Ivan basically mimics the same critiques earlier articulated by Vissarion Belinsky and Alexander Herzen), not to deal with DCT.
Is Dostoevsky a Western philosopher?
Unfortunately, serious academic study of Dostoevsky's thought, along with that of most other Russian philosophers, has in America tended to be largely relegated to the realm of "Russian studies" or "Slavic studies." The vast majority of major Western studies on his thought (as opposed to his literary significance) come from scholars associated with that field, and so they don't tend to integrate him well into Western philosophical conversations. Some theologians engage him heavily too, and recently some very good theological treatments have come out (such as the monograph by Rowan Williams, mandatory for anyone with a strong interest in D.).
Does philosophy make progress?
More so, this basic idea that philosophy doesn't make progress or solve "real" problems borders on a common day-to-day (presumed to be "practical") criticism of philosophy in general, and in some cases it is a claim made to outright dismiss it as a field of study. So I think its worthwhile to look at the issues and confront the critique.
