Knowledge Builders

on what concept is the international division of labor based

by Murphy Balistreri Published 9 months ago Updated 2 months ago

The international division of labour theory is essentially based upon two elements: the “Theorem of Comparative Cost Advantages”, which originates from Ricardo, and the “Factor Proportion Theo- rem” founded by Heckscher and Ohlin.

How did the new division of Labor affect the United States?

This new international division of labor has resulted in three main changes: (1) the decline of the United States as an industrial producer; (2) the decentralization of manufacturing production from the world's core regions to some semiperipheral and peripheral countries; and (3) .

What is the division of Labor?

Any definition of division of labor basically must start with the recognition of two different connotations. In its narrow and simple sense, the concept is used in an economic context. It describes the splitting up of a complex productive task into a number of specialized, simpler tasks.

What was the division of labor in the British Empire?

A division of labor existed in imperial Britain between armchair theorists (like Frazer) and amateur ethnographers (explorers, missionaries, and colonial officers) who reported from outposts of the Empire. W. Littek, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001

What are the advantages of division of Labor?

As employers have realized for centuries now, the concept of division of labor carries many advantages for the company and the employer when it comes to streamlining the production process. Some of the advantages a company experienced in this practice include:


What is the concept of international division of labour?

The international division of labor refers to a conception of economic production as intrinsically transnational and as intrinsically interdependent on labor power based in different places.

What is an example of new international division of labor?

Globalisation has enabled a division of labour by country. For example, the developing world concentrates on the production of primary products. This involves low-paid labour to do the labour intensive work of picking coffee beans.

Does the international division of labor still exist?

There is no new international division of labour. Most developing countries and the Third World as a whole are still mainly exporting raw materials and goods with a low level of value added, and importing more advanced manufactured products.

How has the new international division of labor come about quizlet?

How has the "new international division of labor (NIDL)" come about? The supply curve indicates that as the price of a good increases, more of it will be offered for sale. Once least-cost industrial sites are developed, they maintain their comparative advantage indefinitely due to agglomeration economies.

What are the types of division of labour?

There are four forms of Division of Labour, They are:Occupational or Simple Division of Labour.Division of Labour into complete processes or complex Division of Labour.Division of Labour into sub-processes or incomplete processes. ADVERTISEMENTS:Territorial or geographical Division of Labour.

What is an example of a division of labor?

If labor is divided between five people who specialise in their task, it becomes quicker and more efficient. In turn, the number of goods produced increases. For instance, it is far more difficult for a server at McDonalds to serve customers, cook the burgers, and fry the fries, than purely serve the customer.

What is division of labor and why is it important?

Division of labor combines specialization and the partition of a complex production task into several, or many, sub-tasks. Its importance in economics lies in the fact that a given number of workers can produce far more output using division of labor compared to the same number of workers each working alone.

What is division of labour explain its advantage?

Division of labor is when different tasks are assigned to employees to complete independently to increase output efficiency. Dividing labor is a technique that developed for the industrialization of manufacturing because it allowed for a more streamlined process where each task and responsibility is clearly defined.

WHO said about division of labor?

Adam Smith developed his ideas about the division of labour in the 1760s and 1770 as he was giving lectures and writing the Wealth of Nations (1776).

How has the new international division of labor come about?

The NIDL is a spatial division of labor due to cut ties with national economies. Underdeveloped economies used to be incorporated with the world economy as suppliers of minerals and agricultural commodities. It has since added more production to these types of economies.

What is another name for just in time production quizlet?

Just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing is also known as the Toyota Production System (TPS) because the car manufacturer Toyota adopted the system in the 1970s.

What is the efficiency factor of economic growth?

What are the demand and efficiency factors of economic growth? demand- government must purchase the economy's expanding output of goods and services. Efficiency factor- an economy must achieve economic efficiency as well as full employment. An economy increases its real output and income through what two ways?

What is the new international division of labor AP Human Geography?

New International Division of Labor (or Global Division of Labor) - transfer of some types of jobs, especially those requiring low-paid, less skilled workers, from more developed to less developed countries.

What is the new international division of labor APHG?

New International Division of Labor. Transfer of some types of jobs, especially those requiring low-paid, less-skilled workers, from more developed to less developed countries.

What is global division of labor AP Human Geography?

Global division of labor. phenomenon whereby corporations and others can draw from labor markets around the world, made possible by the compression of time and space thru innovation in communication and transportation systems.

What are examples of globalization?

The Triangular Trade network in which ships carried manufactured goods from Europe to Africa, enslaved Africans to the Americas, and raw materials back to Europe is another example of globalization. The resulting spread of slavery demonstrates that globalization can hurt people just as easily as it can connect people.

How do geographers shape the labor market?from

In addition to exploring the spatialities of daily life that shape labor markets, geographers have also drawn attention to the uneven spatial distribution of different sectors and occupations. Given the pronounced occupational segregation discussed above, the geographies of men and women’s participation are shaped, differentially, by the growth and decline of particular types of work. Thus, Susan Hanson, Geraldine Pratt, Doreen Massey, and others have examined the gendered implications of economic change, especially manufacturing decline and the growth of service sectors and occupations, in industrial areas characterized by unionized, male-dominated jobs. Returning to the discussion about the social construction of skill, labor process theorists like Harry Braverman have argued that as work is deskilled by employers, women would be employed as the new ‘unskilled’ laborers, replacing men. Extending some of the Marxian accounts of women’s work discussed earlier, feminist geographers argued that employers seeking to make use of divisions between workers to reduce their costs may thus be attracted to regions where there is a plentiful supply of cheap ‘green’, female (and indeed child) labor and that these workers constitute a reserve army of labor. Similarly on an international scale, literatures on the new international division of labor in the 1980s drew attention to the feminization of poorly paid manufacturing work as industrialized economies in the north started to relocate labor-intensive manufacturing work, like electronics assembly and garment production, to lower wage economies in Southeast Asia and other parts of the globe.

Who predicted the expansion of the multinational form of industrial organization as a key element of global capitalism?from

In his contribution to a book edited by Jagdish Bhagwati in the early 1970s, Stephen Hymer (1972) asked about the role of the MNC at the end of the twentieth century. Arguing that it represented “an important step forward over previous methods of organizing international exchange” by bringing about an ever more extensive and productive international division of labor, he predicted the continuing expansion of the multinational form of industrial organization as a key element of global capitalism.

What is the new trade theory?from

The “new” new trade theory is highly consistent with microcosmic GPN studies. The inclusion of the theory in the GPN framework provides a new microbasis and new perspectives for the research into GPNs. The theory can explain the heterogeneity and power asymmetry of firms in GPNs, including the behavioral pattern and inner traits of firms and productivity, technology, and workers with heterogeneous skills as the sources of heterogeneity. In conjunction with the fixed costs of trade, the theory can explain firms’ productivity differences, and be used to analyze the influence of firms’ organizational form on international trade and GPNs and in particular, the features and causes of international trade within MNCs, thus enriching the research into GPNs. The “new” new trade theory mainly explains the following issues about GPNs: what kind of firms would create GPNs to serve international markets; what organizational forms would they choose (export or FDI, horizontal or vertical FDI, creation of new business or cross-border M&A, and outsourcing or integration); how do they choose locations (domestic or international and South or North); can GPNs improve firms’ performance and competitiveness. Therefore, the “new” new trade theory offers significant support to microcosmic GPN studies.

How important is embeddedness in Chinese business?from

From a local perspective, Chinese companies should be fully aware of how important embeddedness is to corporate and local development . Embeddedness is far greater than localization in terms of both connotation and implications. Embeddedness stresses the interactions between MNCs and local communities as well as the full integration with local environment in economic, social, technical, institutional, and other dimensions. Therefore, embeddedness plays a key role in MNCs’ global and local economic linkages. When entering an overseas market, Chinese companies should devise the proper embeddedness strategy and path according to local policies, developing from exploratory embeddedness to strategic linkage, strategic embeddedness, and strategic coupling, and from economic to technical, social, cultural, and institutional embeddedness. As embeddedness reaches deeper levels and fulfills more functions, Chinese companies will eventually be rooted in local economic and social networks, achieving win–win interactions with local industries. One-way embeddedness will gradually evolve into two-way embeddedness. Companies’ embeddedness also helps the local economy to be better integrated into GPNs while they improve the configuration of factors worldwide to enhance their competitiveness.

What are the two basic models of firm boundary?from

There are two basic models of firm boundary. One is to apply the transaction cost theory of Coase and Williamson to the study of business internationalization; the other is to adopt the property right analysis method of Grossman et al. (2003) combines the Grossman–Hart–Moore firm theory with the Helpman–Krugman new trade theory in the same analytical framework and proposes a model of incomplete contract and property right model concerning firm boundary to analyze MNCs’ positioning and control decision, which marks the starting point of the endogenous boundary model of the firm. The model defines MNCs’ boundary and the international position of production and can be used to predict the type of intrafirm trade. Inspection by variables show that the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the model and data are consistent. Antras and Helpman (2004) combine the trade models with heterogeneous firms proposed by Melitz (2003) and the endogenous boundary model of the firm proposed by Antras (2003) to create a new theoretical model that analyzes firms’ behavior in international business from their differences in organizational structure and concludes that the decisions on outsourcing or integration, operating at home or abroad, etc. are all firms’ endogenous organizational choices. Antras (2005) creates a dynamic general-equilibrium model of North–South trade to explain the appearance of product life cycle caused by the incompleteness of international contracts. Antras and Helpman (2006) generalize the international production organization model with heterogeneous firms proposed by Antras and Helpman (2004), introduce contractual frictions in the model, and allows for their varying degrees according to inputs and country. This model suggests that firms’ productivity level would influence their strategic choice of organizational form. 7,8

What is the exploitation problem?from

Dependency theorists argued that international capital produced export enclaves in host countries, created few external economies, and had minimal effect on national economies as a whole. Accordingly, TNC investment only intensified the structural heterogeneity of the economies, corrupted domestic elites and further exacerbated the financial and technological dependence on the North. In the 1970s, critics developed these arguments further and pointed to the role of TNCs in shaping and exploiting an inherently uneven geography. At the forefront of this stance was Stephen Hymer (1972), who predicted the continuing expansion of the multinational form of industrial organization (“law of increasing firm size”). In addition to this, he identified the hierarchical division of labor between geographical regions, which corresponds to the vertical division of labor within the firm, as a key for the uneven character of the modern world economy (“law of uneven development”). This was referred to as new international division of labor between company headquarters in the North and different types of offshore ‘global factories’ in the South.

What is endogenous boundary model?from

In general, the endogenous boundary model of the firm proceeds from the organizational choice of individual firms and combines international trade theory with firm theory in the same framework. It marks a further development in the trade theory with heterogeneous firms and offers a brand new perspective for the research into firms’ globalization and industrial organization. The endogenous boundary model of the firm is typically started by the studies of Antras (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004), examines firm heterogeneity’s influence on the strategic choice of outsourcing and insourcing, and explores how firms’ organizational form affects trade model.

What is division of labor?

It describes the splitting up of a complex productive task into a number of specialized, simpler tasks. The most renowned example is that of Adam Smith (1776) for pin needle production. The increase in productivity is exactly the ultimate reason for the separation and specialization of tasks in manufacturing.

What is the role of division of labor in economics?

Classical economics, Marxist political economy, 2 and neoclassical economics all recognized the role of division of labor in enhancing labor productivity and driving economic growth. Classical economics is a school of thought in economics that emerged in the transition from agriculture-centered to industry-centered economy and the discussion is centered on the division of labor is the specialization brought by the division of labor. The most representative economist in this regard is Adam Smith. Marxist political economy focuses on the determination of social development by the division of labor and the representative economist is Karl Marx (1867). Neoclassical economics replaces the labor theory of value in classical economics with the marginal utility theory, the discussion is centered on the allocation of resources, and there are analytical concepts about the division of labor and increasing returns to scale. The typical representatives of this school are Alfred Marshall (1890) and Allyn Young (1928).

What is the most obvious dimension of division of labor?

The most obvious dimension is a broad division of labor between women and men, which all known societies exhibit in some manner or other. This sexual (or gendered) division of labor is obviously important in the area of work, but it also reaches beyond that to social, political, cultural, and religious functions.

Why do librarians need separate divisions?

Instead, by creating separate divisions for each subject or for a range of related subjects, librarians can focus on developing a deep understanding of just one or a few specialisations. Because each division requires several librarians, an abundant workforce and budget are needed to implement this strategy.

Is division of labor a natural trait?

All empirical evidence shows that labor or work always entails some specialization. Division of labor refers to separation of activities and the specialized allocation to different individuals. It is a universal trait of human existence. This does not, however, imply that it is caused by natural differences (biological differences between women and men, for example). Division of labor is always human-made, its forms are socially shaped.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9