What are Research Paradigms?
- Ontology and research paradigms. The ontology is the reality of knowledge that exist and that the research wants to seek. ...
- Epistemology and research paradigms. Epistemology is the philosophical view to seek the reality. ...
- Methodology and research paradigms. ...
What are the different types of research paradigm?
Three Types Of Research Paradigm 1 • ONTOLOGY#N#The Positivism research tradition adherent a realist ontology. Positivist argue human beings to discover the... 2 • EPISTEMOLOGY More ...
What are methodologies in a paradigm?
In one paradigm there can be several methodologies and the researcher can follow anyone of that. These methodologies are approaches to research that can help the researcher conduct a systematic research. For example, if ontology asks does God exist?
What is epistemology and research paradigm?
Epistemology and research paradigms Epistemology is the philosophical view to seek the reality. It paves the way to find the truth that is ontology. Epistemology and ontology are weaved together and none is possible without each other.
What are the 4 parts of a paradigm?
A paradigm consists of four parts: ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Ontology is “concerned with … the nature of existence” (Crotty, 1998: 3) which Grix (2004) considers as the departure point of all research. Epistemology, on the other hand, “deals with the nature of knowledge” (Crotty, 1998: 8).
What are the 3 paradigms of research?
It explores the philosophical underpinnings of three major paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, and critical theory.
What are the main research paradigms?
Research Paradigms Described Four major paradigms seem to compete in qualitative inquiry: positiv- ism, postpositivism, critical theory, and constructivism .
What are the types of paradigm?
It is said that in order to understand the reality there are three main types of paradigms to be employed, namely positivism, interpretivism, and realism. The conception of positivism is directly related to the idea of objectivism.
What is research paradigm and its types?
A research paradigm is a philosophical framework that your research is based on. It offers a pattern of beliefs and understandings from which the theories and practices of your research project operate. A research paradigm consists of ontology, epistemology, and research methodology.
What are the 5 research paradigms?
1.5 Research Paradigms in Social ScienceParadigmEmphasisPositivismObjectivity, knowability, Deductive logicInterpretivismResearch on humansSocial constructionismTruth as varying, socially constructed, and ever-changingCritical paradigmPower, inequality, and social change1 more row
What are two main research paradigms?
Within research, there are two main paradigms, namely positivist and interpretive. The paradigm that a researcher uses depends on where they see themselves in relation to the world around them as well as their views and thoughts.
What are the four paradigms?
The four paradigms are:Behaviorism.Information Processing and Cognitive Psychology.Individual Constructivism.Social Constructivism and Situated Learning.
What is research paradigm in thesis?
A research paradigm is an approach or a model or a pattern to conduct research. It is a framework of thoughts or beliefs or understandings within which theories and practices operate. It acts as a function of how a researcher thinks about the development of knowledge.
Why are paradigms important in research?
Research paradigms are important because they form the philosophical basis of a research project. Research paradigms influence how different schools of learning (such as the sciences versus the humanities) undertake their research.
What are the four paradigms?
The four paradigms are:Behaviorism.Information Processing and Cognitive Psychology.Individual Constructivism.Social Constructivism and Situated Learning.
What is a research paradigm in research?
A paradigm is a set of assumptions and perceptual orientations shared by members of a research community. Paradigms determine how members of research communities view both the phenomena their particular community studies and the research methods that should be employed to study those phenomena.
What are the major paradigms of qualitative research?
The three major paradigms include, positivism, interpretivism, and post-positivism. “A paradigm is a shared world view that represents the beliefs, and values in a discipline and that guides how problems are solved, (Schwandt, 2001).”
How do you identify a research paradigm?
To select a research paradigm the researcher needs to ask some questions to himself. The answers to these questions will enable the researcher decide what paradigm can be used in the research. What is the nature of the research problem that needs to be studied?
What are the three types of research paradigms?
Three Types Of Research Paradigm. The researchers are subjected to different theories, methods, and belief systems which are already existing to guide the investigation, inquiry or study. The research tradition or research paradigm is the system that a researcher needs to follow based on type of a research. Research Paradigm can be defined as ...
What are the strengths and weaknesses of research paradigms?
According to Weaver and Olson (2006), paradigm is defined as the patterns of beliefs which regulate inquiry within a discipline while Taylor, Kermode and Roberts (2007) stated that a paradigm is a broad view or perspective of something.
What is the positivist paradigm?
POSITIVISM. Positivism paradigm originated in 19th century as result…show more content…. The positivist believe that science is only basis for real knowledge. Reason for conducting a positivism is determine laws which can be normalized in explaining the human behavior in the world.
What is the ontology of positivism?
The ontology of positivism research paradigm advocate the scientific research and stresses in order for something to exist must be proven through experiment and observation. The positivist do not reject self-evident proposals particularly on the unknown phenomena.
What are some examples of paradigm shifts?
Examples of such paradigm shifts are; Classical Newtonian physics to quantum-physics, Cyclic landscapes to Continental drift by Alfred Wegener, Creation to Darwinian evolution and geosentrism to heliosentism . iii) Bruno Latour Bruno Latours attribution to the development of science is that of the following meaning; constructionism is the view that understanding science must not be isolated nor should it be limited to a specific view. It should also not be shut off from other processes that produce knowledge. It must rather, in a pragmatic way, take cognicase of the context in which science is practiced. Thus socially plays a role in the development of science.
How is interpretivist research influenced by his/her values?
The research is influenced by his/her values in choosing the research tradition, selecting the topic to investigate, the methods you employ to gather and analyzing information and how the researcher read the results on the study . The interpretivist research is risk to be inflicted by the biasness, to produce neutral inquiry the researcher must army with necessary skills and professionalism in conducing the
What do positivists use in their research?
Positivist make use of observation and experiment in the study. The Positivism research tradition adherent a realist ontology. Positivist argue human beings to discover the world which is made of quantifiable, perceptible and detectable by giving it sense and description.
What are the three paradigms of research?
Paradigm include the methodology, approach, ontology, and epistemology to conduct the research. In one paradigm there can be several methodologies and the researcher can follow anyone of that. These methodologies are approaches to research that can help the researcher conduct a systematic research.
Who defined the research paradigm?
The term paradigm was first used by Kuhn in his work The Structure of Scientific Revolution he defined research paradigm as “an integrated cluster of substantive concepts, variables and problems attached with corresponding methodological approaches and tools”.
What is the epistemology of reality?
Epistemology is the philosophical view to seek the reality. It paves the way to find the truth that is ontology. Epistemology and ontology are weaved together and none is possible without each other. Realism, rationalism, relativism, and irrationalism are some of the epistemology that are out there. Epistemology and ontology are like nail and hammer none can work without each other. If you want to know the reality you should use an epistemology to get the answer. In each research paradigm there are some epistemology the researcher can choose one that suits the research question.
What is the ontology of research?
The ontology is the reality of knowledge that exist and that the research wants to seek. For each research paradigm there is an ontological view that the researcher seeks through research. Monism, pluralism, idealism, dualism, materialism are some of the ontological views that one can follow. The ontology cannot be reached without knowing ...
Why is it important to provide step by step guide to the readers about how the research proceeded and how the researcher?
It is absolutely important for a researcher to provide step-by-step guide to the readers about how the research proceeded and how the researcher got the answers to the research question. As we know that every research should have some characteristics these research characteristics give the research meaning and value. Unless the researcher follows a well-defined path to conduct the research he could not justify his findings to the readers. Additionally other researchers cannot replicate the study nor they can learn from it. A paradigm provides the researcher a guide to follow throughout the research.
Which is more suitable for a positivist: qualitative or mixed-method approach?
For a positivist , quantitative research methodology is more suitable and for a interpretivist qualitative and mixed-method approaches are more common to be used. In interpretivism and pragmatism statistical inquiry or analysis is not always required.
Is a research paradigm a methodology?
Although ontology, epistemology, and methodology have a relationship with the research paradigm but as a student you should know the difference between all of them. You cannot call quantitative approach a paradigm, it is a methodology or approach to research. A research paradigm is a worldview about conducting research.
What are the three paradigms of research?
The article starts with a brief description of the four components of a research paradigm: ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. This is followed by a detailed discussion of the three paradigms and what characterizes the four components in each of the three paradigms. The article concludes by stating that researchers can investigate different phenomena under any of the three paradigms and they should not eschew the possibility of subscribing to different paradigms because of any concerns that they have to be mutually exclusive. Instead, the decision of choosing a philosophical outlook to investigate a phenomenon should be guided by the necessities and requirements of a research study rather than the obdurate insistence of adhering to one particular philosophical outlook to the exclusion of others.
What is research paradigm?
A research paradigm consists of ontology, epistemology, and methodology and is considered to be a model and an approach to research that gives a means to understand reality and study it (Rehman & Alharthi, 2016; Schwandt, 2001). ...
What are the two major sections of the pragmatism paper?
Section one is on research paradigms and covers philosophical foundations of research and research paradigms or world views such as positiv ism, post-positivism, interpretivism, constructivism and pragmatism are included in this paper.
Why is research important?
Research provides the basis for understanding natural phenomenon and can be used as a tool to find solutions to human problems. A researcher's understanding of research paradigms and designs in education forms the basis for an effective research undertaking.
What was the Paradigm Wars?
Raging during the 1980s, the Paradigm Wars resulted in the demise of objectivity-seeking quantitative research on teaching—a victim of putatively devastating attacks from anti-naturalists, interpretivists, and critical theorists. Subsequently, the interpretivists' ethnographic studies flourished, enhancing the cultural appropriateness of schooling, and critical theorists' analyses fostered the struggles for power for the poor, non-Whites, and women. Two alternative versions of the aftermath are also conceivable. Pragmatism and Popper's piecemeal social engineering offer paths toward a productive rapprochement of the paradigms, one guided by the moral obligations of educational research.
What is ethnographic experience?
The ethnographic experience is an indelible venture that continuously redefines one's life. Bringing together important cross-currents in the national debate on education, this book introduces the student or practitioner to the challenges, resources, and skills informing ethnographic research today. From the first chapter describing the cultural foundations of ethnographic research, by George Spindler, the book traces both traditional and new approaches to the study of schools and their communities.
What is the counter terrorism discourse in Kenya?
The terrorism discourse in the Kenyan context dates back to the colonial and post-colonial years with the country having suffered its most devastating terrorist attacks in the period since 1998. Despite a series of dreadful experiences, it was not until 9/11 that the country’s counterterrorism discourse took a serious upward trajectory. This was after Kenya’s elevation by her Western allies as an “anchor” state in the Global War on Terror (GWOT). This development illustrates how Kenya’s security architecture is hugely dependent on Western counterterrorism frameworks, strategies, and at times, security priorities. In this regard, the existing counterterrorism frameworks not only perpetuate colonial continuities but also neglect the national contextual peculiarities. This article, thus, explores how Western constructions of terrorism permeate Kenya’s counterterrorism, and deny subaltern actors the opportunity to participate in developing intervention priorities and owning the strategies. Our analysis of the explicit knowledge predispositions between Western and the local constructions of counterterrorism, consequently, suggest some parallels between colonial continuities and the state-owned interventions. We, therefore, seek to deconstruct the universality of knowledge on counterterrorism, and argue for increased recognition and inclusion of indigenous African counterterrorism approaches which have been obscured from mainstream knowledge systems.
Why do we use research paradigms?
Every research uses one of the research paradigms to use as a guideline for developing research methodology and to take on the research venture in a manner that is most valid and appropriate. Though basically there are two paradigms but there are several other paradigms emerged from these two especially in the social science research.
What is interpretive paradigm?
Interpretative Paradigm. Most of the qualitative research in social sciences use interpretivism approach to research. Interpretivists believe that human behavior is multilayered and it cannot be determined by pre-defined probabilistic models. It depends on the situations and is determined by environmental factors other than the genes.
Why is positivism used in scientific research?
Quantitative research always follows positivist approach because positivists believe in the empirical hypothesis testing. In pure sciences, positivism is preferred because of its empirical nature to study facts.
Why is positivism preferred in science?
In pure sciences, positivism is preferred because of its empirical nature to study facts. In quantitative research, the research follows a probabilistic model that is determined by previous research. Positivists believe that the findings of one study can be generalized to another study of a similar kind regardless of it is conducted in ...
What is quantitative research methodology?
In pure sciences, quantitative research methodology is clearly the most favored approach to conducting the research. In social sciences, there has been debate for over half a decade about the best methodology to use and this resulted in the emergence of mixed-method paradigm or mixed-method methodology. The word paradigm originated ...
Where did the word "paradeigma" come from?
The word paradigm originated from the Greek word “paradeigma” which means pattern. This word was first used in the research by “Kuhn” in 1962 to describe a conceptual framework that is accepted by a community of researchers or scientists and that provides them with an in-depth guideline to conduct the research.
Is human behavior a scientific variable?
A human behavior is quite unlike a scientific variable which is easy to control. Human behaviors are affected by several factors and are mostly subjective in nature. Therefore interpretivistic believe in studying human behavior in the daily life rather than in the controlled environment.
What is research paradigm?
In simple words, a research paradigm is a process of creating a blueprint of research. A research paradigm is of three types-. Ontology – Ontology is a belief about reality. Ontology believes that either a single reality exists or it does not exist.
What is pragmatics in research?
Pragmatics can combine both, positivism and interpretivism positions within the scope of single research according to the nature of the research question. It is a problem-oriented philosophy that takes the view that the best research methods are those that help to most effectively answer the research question.
What is the study of knowledge called?
Epistemology – Epistemology is the study of knowledge. Epistemology is concerned with all aspects of the validity, scope and methods of acquiring knowledge, such as a) what constitutes a knowledge claim; b) how can knowledge be acquired or produced, and c) how the extent of its transferability can be assessed.
What is the philosophy of positivists?
Positivism (Objectivism) – Positivists believe that there is a single reality which can be measured and known. Therefore, quantitative methods are used to measure this reality. Positivism in research is a philosophy that is closely associated with the idea of fact-based investigation.
What is an ontology?
Ontology – Ontology is a belief about reality. Ontology believes that either a single reality exists or it does not exist. To be more specific, ontology answers one question- “ What is a reality ”. For example, consider the question “Does God exist”. Now, there can be two realities (or ontologies) to this question.
What is research philosophy?
Research philosophy is defined as the development of research assumption, its knowledge, and nature. Research philosophy presents the nature of the research, the type of data associated with its, the understanding of the sources of the data and theoretical approaches to analyze it. “Ontology and epistemology are two ways ...
What is the question addressed in methodology?
The question addressed in methodology is “ How to go about in finding the reality/ answer ”. In general, research methodology is used to create a process of how to collect and analyze the data for research. Research Philosophy together with research methodology create a research paradigm.
What is paradigm research?
A paradigm is a fundamental belief system and theoretical framework with assumptions and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality. A criticism of literature from a selected few in the field leads to a deep understanding of the meaning of the research paradigm. For instance, Guba and Lincoln (1994) define a paradigm as a basic set of beliefs or worldview that guides research action or an investigation. Correspondingly, the experts of qualitative research, Denzin and Lincoln (2000), define paradigms as a human construction, which deals with first principles or ultimates indicating where their researcher is coming from to construct meaning embedded in data.
What are the three dominant paradigms?
There are a large number of paradigms that have been proposed by researchers as dominant, but according to Candy 1989, grouped them into three dominant paradigms that are applied in research, namely Positivist, Interpretivist, and Critical theory . Conversely, new researchers propose a fourth element, Tashakkori, and Teddlie (2003a; 2003b) refer to it as the Pragmatic paradigm.
Why are paradigms important?
It is the lens through which a researcher looks at the word; the conceptual lens examines the methodological aspect of their research project to determine the research methods that will be used and how the data will be analyzed. Therefore paradigms are essential because they define a researcher’s philosophical orientation providing beliefs and dictates, which, for the researchers in a particular discipline, influence what should be studied, how it should be studied, and how the results of the study should be interpreted. According to Lincoln and Guba (1985), a paradigm comprises four essential elements, that are, Ontology, Methodology and method, epistemology, and axiology. These components are important because they comprise the basic assumptions, beliefs, norms, and values that each paradigm holds.
How does the interpretive paradigm work?
In summary, the interpretive paradigm will understand social phenomena through the use of qualitative data collection from participants over a stretched period. These are done so that the researcher can discover patterns in the information that are found under broad themes to understand a phenomenon and generate theory.
What is methodology in research?
According to Keeves 1997, Methodology is the broad term used to refer to the research designed, methods, approaches, and procedures used in an investigation that is well planned to find out something. It is the study and critical analysis of data production techniques. It guides the researchers in deciding what type of data is required for a study and which data collection tools will be most appropriate for the study.
What is a Positivist paradigm?
According to Auguste Comte (1798-1857), a French philosopher define a Positivist paradigm as a word view to research, which is grounded in what is known in research methods as the scientific method of investigation. Fadhel 2002 sees it as a preferred world view research because it tries to interpret observations in terms of facts or measurable entities. The aim is to provide explanations and to make predictions based on measurable conclusions. These measurable results can be chained into four assumptions that Cohen, Manion, and Morrison (2000) stated as determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and generalizability. Expounding on each of these assumptions helps the researcher understand better the meaning and expectations of research conducted within this paradigm. For instance, examining a case study of Marijuana abuse,
What is the assumption of empirical research?
The assumption of empiricism means that to be able to investigate a problem there is a need to collect verifiable empirical data, which will support the abstract framework chosen for the research and enable the testing of the theories formulated. In the case study, the number of youths will be taken to know how many are affected and also to try to see the factors that lead to the use.
What are interpretive research methods?
Interpretive researchers use different methodologies such as case studies, phenomenology, and ethnography. Denzin and Lincoln (2008: 29) state that “qualitative researchers deploy a wide range of interconnected interpretive methods, always seeking better ways to make more understandable the worlds of experiences they have studied.” Interpretivist methodology aims at exploring and understanding phenomenon inductively. Interpretivists believe that the “social world can only be understood from the standpoint of the individuals who are part of the ongoing action being investigated” (Cohen et al, 2003: 19). For this reason, interpretive researchers start with individuals and try to understand their interpretations of the world surrounding them. Denzin and Lincoln (2008: 9) compare the researcher to a bricoleur and state that the “interpretive bricoleur understands that research is an interactive process shaped by his own personal history, biography, gender, social class, race, and ethnicity, and by those of the people in the setting”. Contrary to the positivist paradigm, theory should generate from the data (Cresswel, 2003); it should follow data and not precede it (Cohen, 2003). Moreover, researchers are not detached from the situation under study. They “see themselves as participants in the situation they investigate” (Edge and Richards, 1998: 336). According to interpretivism, it is the involvement that enables researchers to have a thick description of the situation (Holliday, 2007: 74-5) under study.
What are the criteria for positivist research?
Validity and reliability are the criteria to evaluate the quality of a positivist research. Kumar (1999: 138) defines validity as the “ability of an instrument to measure what it is designed to measure.” This definition with a focus on a measurement perspective seems not to satisfy Lynch (2003) (as cited in Dornyei 2007: 51) who summarizes the new concept of validity by stating that when “examining the validity of assessment, it is important to remember that validity is the property of conclusions, interpretations or inferences that we draw from the assessment instruments and procedures, not the instruments and procedures themselves.” Positivists try to meet internal and external validity when they conduct research. For positivists, the findings of a study are not internally valid if factors other than the independent variable affect the outcome. External validity is the extent to which the findings can be generalized to larger groups. The main task of a researcher is to manipulate variables and control other variables that may be a threat to the validity of the research. Mortality, history, Hawthorne effect, and practice effect are mentioned to be among the potential threats to validity. Seale (2002: 103) realizes the challenge of predicting threats in that the “use of threats requires an imaginative effort by the researcher to enter the minds of potential critics.” Reliability, on the other hand, is “a synonym for consistency and replicability over time, over instruments and over groups of respondents” (Cohen et al 2003: 117). Perry (2005) shares the same position and defines reliability as consistency of data results. According to Kumar (1999), a research instrument is said to be reliable if it is consistent, stable, predictable, and accurate.
What is positivism in science?
Positivists think that they can apply methods of the natural sciences on the practices of social sciences. Positivist social scientists try to replicate procedures followed by natural scientists to control and understand the natural world. They are committed to value neutrality, statistical measurement, quantifiable elements, and observable events to establish causal laws (Seale, 2000). Grix (2004) presents the most significant premises of the positivist approach (what does Girx say?). Positivists believe in the possibility of establishing cause-effect relationship. They are after regularities to make predictions and establish scientific laws and that, based on this factor; it is possible to use scientific methods to analyze the social world. Positivists believe that the role of the neutral researcher is to present an objective explanation of matters of concern and predict laws (such as what?). From the previous principles, we can understand the ontological and epistemological assumptions of the positivists.
What is critical methodology?
Critical methodology is directed to raise the awareness of participants and interrogate accepted injustice and discrimination. Critical theorists are “concerned with action rather than discovery” (Edge and Richards, 1998: 341). Critical researchers have an agenda of change to improve the lives and situations of the oppressed. Creswell (2009: 9) states that “the advocacy/ participatory worldview holds that research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political agenda.” Researchers and participants are involved in the research process. Participants may help in designing question research, collecting and analyzing data, and “reap the results of the research” (Creswell, 2009: 9). Habermas in Carr and Kemmis(1986) contends that human knowledge is made up of the technical, practical and emancipatory interests and that critical science theory serves the emancipatory interest in freedom and emancipation.
Who is the founder of critical theory?
Critical theory is associated with the Institute for Social Research founded by Adorno, Marcuse, and Horkheimer. It is especially influenced by the work of Habermas (1972) and Freire who claims that “liberation is thus a childbirth, and a painful one.” (1996: 31)
What is interpretivism in psychology?
Interpretivists state that reality is multi-layered and complex. They believe that people are creative and active ly construct their social reality. They further note that the social world should be studied in the natural world, through the eyes of the participants, without the intervention of the researcher.
Definition of Research Paradigms
Ontology and Research Paradigms
- The ontology is the reality of knowledge that exist and that the research wants to seek. For each research paradigm there is an ontological view that the researcher seeks through research. Monism, pluralism, idealism, dualism, materialism are some of the ontological views that one can follow. The ontology cannot be reached without knowing the epist...
Epistemology and Research Paradigms
- Epistemology is the philosophical view to seek the reality. It paves the way to find the truth that is ontology. Epistemology and ontology are weaved together and none is possible without each other. Realism, rationalism, relativism, and irrationalism are some of the epistemology that are out there. Epistemology and ontology are like nail and hammer none can work without each other. If …
Methodology and Research Paradigms
References
- Makombe, G. (2017). “An expose of the relationship between paradigm, method and design in research.” The Qualitative Report, 22(12), 3363-3382. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss...
- Shah, S. R. and Abdullah A. (2013). “Research Paradigms: Researchers’ Worldviews, Theoretical Frameworks and Study Designs.” Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 252-264. http…
- Makombe, G. (2017). “An expose of the relationship between paradigm, method and design in research.” The Qualitative Report, 22(12), 3363-3382. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss...
- Shah, S. R. and Abdullah A. (2013). “Research Paradigms: Researchers’ Worldviews, Theoretical Frameworks and Study Designs.” Arab World English Journal, 4(4), 252-264. https://pdfs.semanticscholar....
The Definition of A Research Paradigm
- A research paradigm is a philosophical framework that your research is based on. It offers a pattern of beliefs and understandings from which the theories and practices of your research project operate. A research paradigm consists of ontology, epistemology, and research methodology. ● Ontologyanswers the question: “What is reality?” That is, does ...
Why Are Research Paradigms Important?
- Research paradigms are important because they form the philosophical basis of a research project. Research paradigms influence how different schools of learning (such as the sciences versus the humanities) undertake their research. Once a research philosophy has been determined, an appropriate methodology can be chosen. Furthermore, a knowledge of the philos…
Common Examples of Research Paradigms
- 1. Positivism Positivists believe that there’s a single reality that’s possible to measure and understand. Because of this, they’re most likely to use quantitativemethods in their research. Typically, positivists propose a hypothesis that can be proved or disproved using statistical data analysis. Positivism tends to investigate the existence of a relationship between two variables ra…
Merging Research Paradigms
- While most social science research operates from either a positivist (experimental) or constructivist paradigm, it’s possible to combine both, as the field of psychology often does. Quantitative and qualitative methodology are frequently used together in psychology, illustrating the subject’s footing in multiple research paradigms (positivist and constructivist).
Expert Editing and Proofreading
- If you’re writing a research proposal orpaper, you’ll want to ensure that your writing is error-free, fluent, and precise. Although re-reading your own work is valuable, it can be very helpful to get another opinion on your writing. We offer a free trial of proofreading and editing services when you submit your first document. Clickhereto find out more!