
Full Answer
Which argument is a straw man fallacy?
Straw man argument is a flawed line of reasoning that occurs when someone substitutes an opposing argument with a distorted, oversimplified, exaggerated, or misrepresented version of it in order to make it easier to defeat. As such, this fallacy takes the following logical form: Person 1 makes an argument X.
What does it mean to create a strawman?
Therefore, straw man document or straw man proposal means it is a “flimsy” document that is just an initial draft of a subject which is expected to be modified by others 2. A debate technique used to refute an opposing view by misrepresenting the opposing side and then attribute that deliberately misrepresented view to the opponents.
What is the definition of straw man fallacy?
The straw man is a logical fallacy that replaces something (a person, a viewpoint, an argument) with a distorted version that blows the original out of proportion to make it easier to attack. It’s one of the most common fallacies–like a hasty generalization, ad hominem, or slippery slope. The term “straw man” is based on a metaphor.
What is the strawman argument?
The term straw man comes from scarecrows. A straw man argument is a rhetorical device that is meant to easily prove that one’s position or argument is superior to an opposing argument. However, this argument is regarded as a logical fallacy, because at its core, the person using the device misrepresents the other person's argument.

What is straw man fallacy give example?
For example, when one person says “I like Chinese more than Pizza”, and the respondent says “Well, you must hate Pizza”, they have created a strawman. The first person never said they hated pizza. They have been misrepresented. No matter your political position, we all run the risk of creating strawmen.
What does the phrase straw man mean?
1. : a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted.
What is straw man fallacy argument?
A straw man argument is the logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against that extreme version.
What is another term for the straw man fallacy?
an argument that appears good at first view but is really fallacious. a person used as a cover for some questionable activity. synonyms: figurehead, front, front man, nominal head, strawman. type of: beguiler, cheat, cheater, deceiver, slicker, trickster. someone who leads you to believe something that is not true.
How do you use straw man in a sentence?
1. The marketing team didn't have all of the details, so they created a straw man draft of what new markets they wanted to conquer. 2. Although it wouldn't be the final draft, the builders sketched out a simplified straw man to use as a guide.
How do you stop the strawman argument?
The main way to counter a straw man is to point out its use, and to then ask your opponent to prove that your original stance and their distorted stance are identical, though in some situations you might also choose to either ignore your opponent's strawman, or to simply accept it and continue the discussion.
How do you identify a strawman argument?
A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person's argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making.
What is the straw man technique?
A. straw man takes place when a person exaggerates, distorts, or oversimplifies. the views of a specific or hypothetical opponent so that the new, ridiculous. position can be knocked down, like a person made of straw (e.g., Porter, 2002).
What is fallacy examples?
A fallacy is an illogical step in the formulation of an argument. An argument in academic writing is essentially a conclusion or claim, with assumptions or reasons to support that claim. For example, "Blue is a bad color because it is linked to sadness" is an argument because it makes a claim and offers support for it.
How do you make a straw man?
How to Build a Strawman ProposalCreate a draft proposal.Present your draft to the rest of the team. ... Knock the strawman down. ... Build your proposal back up again.Test the proposal against your original objectives.Repeat as necessary until you reach your objective.
What is an example of a begging the question?
“Begging the question” is often used incorrectly when the speaker or writer really means “raising the question.” For example: Jane is an intelligent, insightful, well-educated and personable individual, which begs the question: why does she stay at that dead-end job?
What is an example of false dilemma?
A false dilemma is a fallacy that misrepresents an issue by presenting only two mutually exclusive options rather than the full, nuanced range of options. Here's a basic example: If we don't order pizza for dinner, we'll have to eat the week-old spaghetti in the fridge.
Where did the phrase straw man come from?
straw man (n.) 1590s, "doll or scarecrow made of bound straw," from straw (n.) + man (n.). Figuratively, in debates, by 1896, from man of straw "an easily refuted imaginary opponent in an argument," which is recorded from 1620s.
Can strawman be unintentional?
A straw man argument is a kind of logical fallacy, which is an illogical or misleading argument. Straw man arguments can be made unintentionally, but most are made on purpose to make the other side seem evil, incompetent, or extremist.
How do you make a strawman?
How to Build a Strawman ProposalCreate a draft proposal.Present your draft to the rest of the team. ... Knock the strawman down. ... Build your proposal back up again.Test the proposal against your original objectives.Repeat as necessary until you reach your objective.
What is a straw man model?
A straw-man (or straw-dog) proposal is a brainstormed simple draft proposal intended to generate discussion of its disadvantages and to spur the generation of new and better proposals.
What is the straw man fallacy?
The straw man fallacy is an argument that disturbs and twists the opposition’s stance to make it convenient to rebut. The person committing the straw man fallacy gives the impression of having dealt with an argument while actually not addressing its core aspects.
What Is A Straw Man Argument?
Before we dip into some straw man fallacy examples, let’s understand the straw man fallacy in detail. Generally, the use of the straw man fallacy consists of the following three steps:
What is the Harappa framework?
Harappa’s ABCD framework can be used to effectively drive and lead the arguments. Following the ABCD Framework, an argument can be enhanced and faulty reasoning can be corrected. The ABCD framework polishes the argument at four levels: Accuracy in reasoning, Believability in concluding, Clarity of understanding, and Detailing in articulating. Sign up now and learn how to think critically at work. And life in general.
How is an iron man argument created?
An iron-man argument is created in similar ways as a straw man argument, that is, by misrepresenting the original stance. However, in this case, people create their stance in such a way that it’s easier to defend. These arguments are difficult to avoid because they have several overlapping features with legitimate debate strategies. People often use jargon or imprecise terms that are so vague and confusing that no one can challenge those arguments.
What is the term for a person who attacks a twisted version of the opponent's stance?
When one attacks a twisted version of the opponent’s stance, they can be said to have committed a straw man fallacy. The term is said to come from the idea of an imaginary man of straw or scarecrow who is seen as a weak adversary.
How to defend a twisted view?
Challenge the opponent to validate or provide proof for their twisted view. Ask them to explain clearly and logically how it’s identical or equivalent to your original statement. The opponent will then have no option but to defend their view.
What is the first step in a legal argument?
An individual begins by stating their position. This can include opening statements, remarks, comments or facts. They present their case, present proposed changes and/or provide sufficient evidence to support their stance.
What is a straw man argument?
A straw man argument, sometimes called a straw person argument or spelled strawman argument, is the logical fallacy of distorting an opposing position into an extreme version of itself and then arguing against that extreme version.
How does a straw man argument work?
A straw man argument is constructed by presenting an opposing position as a warped, extreme version of itself. There are a few different ways an individual might turn a reasonable argument into a straw man:
When and why is the straw man fallacy used?
You’ve probably seen and heard straw man arguments in webcomics, on podcasts, on talk radio, in blog posts, and on television. They often appear in political rhetoric. You might have even used them yourself, even without realizing it.
How to counter a straw man argument
To counter a straw man version of your position, restate your position in the clearest, most definitive language possible. The clearer you are, the more difficult it is for your opponent to distort your works or take them out of context. This works as a straw man prevention strategy as well as a straw man rebuttal strategy.
Straw man argument examples
Here are a few more straw man argument examples. Keep in mind that straw man arguments often arise as reactions to others’ statements.
What is the straw man fallacy?
Of the many types of logical fallacies, the straw man fallacy is particularly common in political debates and in discussions over controversial topics. The basic structure of the argument consists of Person A making a claim, Person B creating a distorted version of the claim (the “straw man”), and then Person B attacking this di storted version in order to refute Person A’s original assertion.
Why is it important to counter the straw man fallacy?
Calmly countering the straw man fallacy allows you to regain control of the topic. This will stop the conversation veering off on a tangent and moving further and further away from the original point being made.
How to respond to a straw man argument?
Basically, when you hear a straw man argument in response to your point, rephrase their argument in the most positive and charitable way possible . Ask for their agreement with your rephrasing, and then state your counterargument to that point. (For example, in the cat vs. dog example above, the wife can say "You think that I only want a dog because I don't like cats." The husband agrees. Then the wife can spend time explaining why she prefers dogs to cats — and likely convincing her husband that a dog is the better choice.)
What are some examples of straw man arguments?
For example: Parent: Your curfew is at 10 pm tonight. Teenager: But the party doesn't even start until 9:00.
Is Medicare for all a straw man argument?
Politics is a popular place to find logical fallacies, particularly straw man arguments. Consider the controversial issue of universal healthcare, known on some platforms as Medicare for All. Politician A: Providing medicare for all citizens would be costly and a danger to the free market.
Is the argument of the advocate and the opponent correct?
Both positions are technically correct, but the opponent's argument has nothing to do with the advocate's position. The opponent created a straw man about the transportation industry and claimed the advocate prefers new technology, which is not what the advocate said. If the advocate then responds to the comment about jobs, they have allows the opponent to derail the conversation.
Is a straw man a red herring?
The opposing argument may focus on just one aspect of the claim, take it out of context or exaggerate it. The straw man argument, in this way, is an example of a red herring. It’s meant to distract from the real issue being discussed and is not a logically valid argument. The best way to understand this phenomenon is with some straw man fallacy examples.
What does "man of straw" mean?
A common but false etymology is that it refers to men who stood outside courthouses with a straw in their shoe to signal their willingness to be a false witness. The Online Etymology Dictionary states that the term “man of straw” can be traced back to 1620 as “an easily refuted imaginary opponent in an argument.”.
What are straw man arguments?
Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate: 1 A: We should relax the laws on beer. 2 B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only for immediate gratification.
What is a strawman?
A straw man (sometimes written as strawman) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
What is the third form of the hollow man?
Aikin and Casey expanded on this model in 2010, introducing a third form. Referring to the "representative form" as the classic straw man, and the "selection form" as the weak man, the third form is called the hollow man. A hollow man argument is one that is a complete fabrication, where both the viewpoint and the opponent expressing it do not in fact exist, or at the very least the arguer has never encountered them. Such arguments frequently take the form of vague phrasing such as "some say," "someone out there thinks" or similar weasel words, or it might attribute a non-existent argument to a broad movement in general, rather than an individual or organization.
What is the opposite of the straw man argument?
Steelmanning. The steel man argument (or steelmanning) is the exact opposite of the straw man argument. The idea is to help one's opponent to construct the strongest form of their argument.
What does Person 2 argue against?
Person 2 argues against a superficially similar proposition Y, falsely, as if an argument against Y were an argument against X.
Which scientist promoted the justification of racism?
Whereas, the writings of Charles Darwin, the father of evolution, promoted the justification of racism, and his books On the Origin of Species and The Descent of Man postulate a hierarchy of superior and inferior races. . . .
Why is the straw man fallacy subtle?
Why? Because it can charitably be assumed that most in the prochoice camp don’t literally believe babies should be killed—they just don’t think the unborn are babies. Instead, they think the unborn are mere “cells” or “tissue.”.
How to avoid the straw man fallacy?
In conclusion, the best way to avoid the “straw man” fallacy is for individuals to return to medieval debate courtesy, where both individuals make sure they understand their interlocutor’s point c ompletely before engaging in meaningful discussion.
Why do people commit fallacy?
Those who commit this fallacy can largely be placed in one of two groups: (1) those who commit the fallacy because they intentionally desire to misconstrue their opponent’s viewpoint for an easy takedown or (2) those who commit the fallacy out of ignorance because they don’t know their opponent’s position, and, therefore, they choose instead to interact with a weaker version of the case being made.
What is a straw man?
In the context of logical fallacies, a “straw man” argument is an argument that is framed in such a way that it is easy to “knock down” or dismantle.
Do you see the straw man?
Do you see the “straw man”? They unfairly characterize Christianity; there are millions of Christian women in the world today, and it would be hard to imagine that even one of them believes Christianity espouses women hatred, yet still chooses to be a Christian. Prima facie, it seems ridiculous to make that claim. It’s another question entirely as to whether there are individual Christians in the world who hate women—there just may be. But it is absolutely fallacious to create a “straw man” of Christianity just so it can be knocked down or discredited.
What is the straw man fallacy?
A straw man fallacy is a kind of logical fallacy that occurs when a person deliberately distorts their opponent’s argument and proceeds to argue against that distortion instead of the actual position. Straw man arguments are so named because the person erects a “straw man” of their opponent’s position and proceeds to attack it instead ...
How to defend against the straw man fallacy?
In the case of the straw man fallacy, the best defense is to avoid it entirely. You should train your mental habits so that you can clearly represent and reason with another person’s views. This requires a fair amount of empathy and charity. It is also an important part of growing your mindset and developing your own beliefs.
How to use straw man?
A common straw-manning tactic is to present an absurd caricature of your opponent’s position and argue against the obviously weaker absurd position.
Why are straw man arguments so named?
Straw man arguments are so named because the person erects a “straw man” of their opponent’s position and proceeds to attack it instead of the person’s actual views. Straw man fallacies rear their ugly head all over the place.
Why is B's response a straw man fallacy?
B’s response is a straw man fallacy. It’s a straw man fallacy because A didn’t say that we should give free money to people who don’t work. They merely stated that more federal funds should be diverted to social programs, many of which go to people who do, in fact, work.
What is steel man?
Steel manning is when you provide the strongest possible version of your opponent’s view and then proceed to argue against it. Unlike the straw man, which creates a distorted caricature of your opponent’s argument, a steel man presents it in the best possible light.
Why are feminist positions often distorted?
Feminist positions on issues are often distorted to make feminists seem ridiculous or hateful.
What is the straw man fallacy?
The “Straw Man Fallacy” is committed when an opponent’s argument is misrepresented, and the person proceeds to refute that misrepresentation of the argument. It is called a “straw man” because, like a straw man, it is easily knocked over.
What are some examples of straw man fallacies?
Some common examples of the “Straw Man Fallacy” include: 1 The Christian view of “faith” is believing something without evidence. We should only believe things that have the evidence to back it up, so therefore, we should reject Christianity.#N#This is an example of the straw man fallacy because it misrepresents the Christian conception of “faith”, and then deems such a position as irrational. The biblical notion of faith connotes the idea of “trust”. Furthermore, the trust that the believer has in God is based in God’s demonstration of his faithfulness in the past. It is for this reason the Bible places great emphasis on God keeping his covenant faithfully. 2 Christians deny the usefulness of science. Instead, they believe that the Bible contains all the truths about the world that we need.#N#This is an example of the straw man fallacy because it misrepresents the Christian notion of the role and usefulness of science. It needs to be pointed out that it was in the Christian West, where science flourished. Indeed the scientific method was developed with the assumption that we lived in a world created by God who created the world in such a way that we can make predictions and learn about God’s creation. Indeed, Christians believe science is very useful; but we do not assign to science a role that surpasses what it is meant to accomplish.
What is the straw man argument?
The term “straw man” is based on a metaphor. The arguer doesn’t attack the “real man,” that is, the real person, argument, or claim. The arguer instead constructs a fake man made of straw, and then attacks that straw man. The arguer then claims to have defeated the real person, argument, or claim, even though the arguer hasn’t said anything about it. That’s where the fallacy comes in: you can’t defeat something you don’t deal with at all. The arguer can’t win the argument because he hasn’t dealt with the real person, argument, or claim; he has dealt solely with the straw man.
What is a Straw Man?
The straw man is a logical fallacy that replaces something (a person, a viewpoint, an argument) with a distorted version that blows the original out of proportion to make it easier to attack. It’s one of the most common fallacies–like a hasty generalization, ad hominem, or slippery slope.
Why can't an argument win?
The arguer can’t win the argument because he hasn’t dealt with the real person, argument, or claim; he has dealt solely with the straw man. People use straw man fallacies knowingly or unknowingly to avoid challenging a stronger opponent. Politicians often make use of the straw man to attack opponents.
What is the opposite of constructing a straw man?
So they take the burden on themselves to formulate the best versions of those arguments. Constructing a version of an argument that’s stronger than the original is the opposite of constructing a straw man.
What is the argument against Person A's claim?
Explanation: A real argument against Person A’s claim would try to show that nuclear energy is not a safe, reliable way to combat climate change. Instead of trying to show that, however, Person B attacks another claim that is not relevant to what Person A said.
When is straw man 2021?
Straw Man: Definition, Examples, and How to Disarm It. By Vishal / June 8, 2021. June 30, 2021. Many people formed their first impression of Kamala Harris during the democratic primary debate. She argued that when Biden was a Senator he voted for a bill that opposed bussing. There was a little girl in California, she said, ...
Can a straw man fool the person who made the original claim?
A straw man can even fool the person who made the original claim: the wife might get tricked into defending the straw man that her husband has constructed, and never steer the conversation back to her original claim.
What is a strawman argument?
Strawman Arguments: What They Are and How to Counter Them. A strawman is a fallacious argument that distorts an opposing stance in order to make it easier to attack. Essentially, the person using the strawman pretends to attack their opponent’s stance, while in reality they are actually attacking a distorted version of that stance, ...
How to defend a strawman?
Call out your opponent on their use of the strawman, by explaining why their argument is fallacious, and how it distorts your original stance. You can put them on the defensive by asking them to justify why they believe that the distorted stance that they present is the same as the one that you originally proposed; since the two are different, your opponent will either be forced to admit that their argument was invalid, or they will try to justify it by using even more fallacious reasoning, which you can then attack.
How does a strawman work?
How a strawman works. In general, the use of a strawman consists of the following three stages: First, person A states their position. Then, person B presents a distorted version of person A’s original position, while pretending that there’s no difference between the two versions. Finally, person B attacks the distorted version ...
How to distort an opposing view?
Common ways to do so include: Oversimplifying, generalizing, or exaggerating the opponent’s argument. Focusing on only a few specific aspects of an opponent’s argument. Quoting parts of the opponent’s argument out of context.
Why is the Iron Man argument different from the Steel Man argument?
Specifically, while iron-man arguments are used in order to make it easier for you to defend your own stance, steel-man arguments make it more difficult for you to attack your opponent’s stance.
What are the variations of the straw man?
Variants of the straw man include the hollow-man argument, which involves inventing a fictitious position and attributing it to the opposition, the iron- man argument , which involves distorting your own stance in order to make it easier for you to defend, and the steel-man argument, which involves distorting your opponent’s stance in order to make it harder for you to attack.
How to make an iron man argument?
One of the most prominent ways to create an iron-man argument is to use vague statements that are easy to agree with, even if they don’t have much to do with your actual point. For example, consider the following exchange:

Overview
A straw man (sometimes written as strawman) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the real subject of the argument was not addressed or refuted, but instead replaced with a false one. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
History
Perhaps the earliest known use of the phrase was by Martin Luther in his book On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church (1520), where he is responding to arguments of the Roman Catholic Church and clergy attempting to delegitimize his criticisms, specifically on the correct way to serve the Eucharist. The church claimed Martin Luther is arguing against serving the Eucharist according to one type of serving practice; Martin Luther states he never asserted that in his critic…
Structure
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:
1. Person 1 asserts proposition X.
2. Person 2 argues against a superficially similar proposition Y, falsely, as if an argument against Y were an argument against X.
This reasoning is a fallacy of relevance: it fails to address the proposition in question by misrepre…
Examples
An everyday conversation:
• Alice: Taking a shower is beneficial.
• Bob: But hot water may damage your skin.
Bob attacked the non-existing argument: Taking an extremely hot shower is beneficial. And because such an argument is obviously false, Alice might start believing that she is wrong becau…
Contemporary work
In 2006, Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin expanded the application and use of the straw man fallacy beyond that of previous rhetorical scholars, arguing that the straw man fallacy can take two forms: the original form that misrepresents the opponent's position, which they call the representative form; and a new form they call the selection form.
The selection form focuses on a partial and weaker (and easier to refute) representation of the o…
Steelmanning
A steel man argument (or steelmanning) is the opposite of a straw man argument. The idea is to help one's opponent to construct the strongest form of their argument. This may involve removing flawed assumptions that could be easily refuted, for example, so that one produces the best argument for the "core" of one's opponent's position. It has been advocated as a more productive strategy in political dialog that promotes real understanding and compromise instead of fueling p…
See also
• Aunt Sally
• Ad hominem
• Begging the question
• Devil's advocate
• Cherry picking (fallacy)
External links
• Straw Man Arguments: How to Recognize, How to Counter, and When to Use Them Yourself: a discussion of straw man arguments and their usage in debates.
• The Straw Man Fallacy at the Fallacy Files
• Straw Man, more examples of straw man arguments