by Kenyatta Willms
Published 3 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
In his lecture “Politics as a Vocation” (1918), the German sociologist Max Weber defines the state as a “human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” Under feudalism, no lords, including the king, could claim a monopoly over the use of ...
Weber defined the modern state as a community that successfully claims a monopoly over violence within a geographical area, which required it to have legitimate and legal authority. The concepts of violence, territoriality, and legitimacy are the definitive factors of Weber's modern state.
How does Max Weber define state?
There is no undisputed definition of a state. A widely used definition from the German sociologist Max Weber is that a "state" is a polity that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence, although other definitions are not uncommon.
What is a state by Max Weber?
MaxWeber‘ definition of the state as a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory (Weber, 1946) is widely used in the contemporary political science; there is hardly a more frequently used quotation.
What religion is Max Weber?
Weber says that Calvinist sect of protestant Christian religion has strongest influences on the development of capitalism. The theory also captures several significant socio-economic influences which distinguish western from the eastern characteristics.
See more
What does Weber call the state?
In this definition Weber calls the state as a: (1) System of administration and law. (2) It is a symbol of collective action which means whatever the state performs is always for the general public of the community and not for particular group of people. (3) A modern state exercises domination over the community.
What is Weber's theory of state?
Weber’s theory of state is inseparably connected with bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is the most rational, efficient, powerful and hierarchical apparatus of state administration. Specialist training is badly needed, for state administration is imparted on the recruited persons to make them efficient for state administration.
What is the difference between Marxian and Weberian states?
Marxian State and Weberian State: Weber, in his interpretations of state, differs from Marx, Engels and Lenin. The basic points of differences are noted below: (1) Marx and Engels believed that the state was the outcome of the rise of property system, classes and class antagonisms.
What is the legitimacy of a state?
“The legitimacy of the modern state is founded predominantly on legal authority that is commitment to a code of legal regulations”.
What are the institutions of a modern state?
These institutions are many in form and kind. They are political, economic, social, cultural etc. Some of these institutions are directly controlled by the state and some are not. But the institutions are not above the law and authority of state.
What is the nature of a state?
He says: A modern state is a system of administration and law which is modified by state and law and which guides the collective actions of the executive staff; the executive is regulated by statute likewise, and claims authority over members ...
Did Weber think of a future state structure?
ADVERTISEMENTS: Moreover, he did not think of a future state structure. So far as the concept of state is concerned the fundamental difference between the two giant philosophers of Germany is Marx viewed the state as a powerful instrument of class rule, Weber thought that it was as apparatus of state administration.
8 hours ago
· Max Weber (1864-1920) was a German economist, philosopher, and sociologist noted for his studies on the modern state. Weber defined the modern state as a community that successfully claims a ...
7 hours ago
· In his lecture “Politics as a Vocation” (1918), the German sociologist Max Weber defines the state as a “human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” Under feudalism, no lords, including the king, could claim a monopoly over the use of
2 hours ago
According to this version, Weber sees the state as an "Anstaltsstaat" — a state characterized by a rationally imposed order. Breuer shows how Weber relies on Tonnies to show how the state is only possible within certain kinds of socializations embodying particular types of rationality.
30 hours ago
Let us start with the definition of state given by Max Weber. He says: A modern state is a system of administration and law which is modified by state and law and which guides the collective actions of the executive staff; the executive is regulated by statute likewise, and claims authority over members of the association (those who necessarily belong to the association by birth) but …
4 hours ago
· Max Weber defined ''state'' as a political organization that is raised by human necessity and is formed with the aim of organizing and managing societies, thus it is …
15 hours ago
Max Weber notes that the political state cannot be defined by its activities as there have been no activities that have not been undertaken by states, and moreover, there are no activities that are conducted by only the state. Thus, for Weber, the state can only be defined by the ‘specific means that are peculiar to it’. The means that are peculiar and unique to the state, Weber argues, is the …
