what is the covariation model in psychology

Full Answer

What is covariation in psychology?

n. a relationship between two quantitative variables such that as one variable tends to increase (or decrease) in value, the corresponding values of the other variable tend to also increase (or decrease).

What are the three elements of Kelley's covariation model?

As shown in Exhibit I, covariation theory has three main components: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency.

What is a covariation and how is it used?

Covariance is a statistical tool that is used to determine the relationship between the movements of two random variables. When two stocks tend to move together, they are seen as having a positive covariance; when they move inversely, the covariance is negative.

What are the 3 kinds of covariation information when observing the behavior of others?

According to the covariation principle, you should be able to determine the cause of Jane's behavior by considering the three types of covariation information: consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus.

What is a major assumption of Kelleys Covariation model?

The major assumption of Kelley's Covariation Theory is that as people gather information to make judgements, they attribute behaviors with logic and rationality.

What are the three 3 factors that influence attribution?

The Attribution Theory DimensionsLocus of Control. This is defined as a learner's belief that their behavior is motivated by internal or external causes. ... Stability. The likelihood that the attribution cause will change over a period of time. ... Controllability.

Why is covariation important?

Covariation for baseline score may enhance detection of treatment effects, because the variance explained by the baseline score is removed from the error variance in the estimate of the difference in outcome between treatments.

Who made the covariation model?

Covariation Model is an attribution theory in which a person tries to explain others' or her certain behavior through multiple observations. It deals with both social perception and self-perception of the person. It was proposed by Harold Kelley.

What does covariance mean in research?

Covariance is defined as the expected value of variations of two variables from their expected values. More simply, covariance measures how much variables change together. The mean of each variable is used as reference and relative positions of observations compared to mean is important.

What is an example of covariation principle?

Consistency is the covariation of behavior across time. If Jane is generous all the time, she shows high consistency. If Jane is rarely generous or is generous only at specific times, perhaps around the holidays, she shows low consistency.

What are 3 methods of observation used by psychologists?

Observation MethodsControlled Observations.Naturalistic Observations.Participant Observations.

What are the 4 types of observation in psychology?

Structured observation.Covert observation.Participant observation.Overt observation.Unstructured observation.

What are the 3 factors involved in the correspondent inference theory?

Correspondent Inference TheoryThe actor (person who performs the action) is fully aware of the consequences of the actions.He/she is able to perform the action.The actor deliberately performed the action.

What is Kelley's model?

Kelley's (1967) covariation model is the best-known attribution theory. He developed a logical model for judging whether a particular action should be attributed to some characteristic (dispositional) of the person or the environment (situational).

What are the three attribution theories?

Weiner's achievement attribution has three categories: stable theory (stable and unstable) locus of control (internal and external) controllability (controllable or uncontrollable)

What are the three dimensions of attributions?

Learners tend to explain their reasons for success or failure based upon three dimensions: 1) internal or external, 2) stable or unstable, and 3) controllable or uncontrollable. When examining an individual's attributions, one must first examine the influence that the individual has over the examined outcome.

What is the covariation model?

The covariation model is one of the theories of attribution, explanations about how we search for the causes of something. Attribution theories try to explain how people interpret events and how they relate them to their way of thinking and acting.

What is the theory of cognitive covariation?

The covariation model is one of the theories of attribution, explanations about how we search for the causes of something. Attribution theories try to explain how people interpret events and how they relate them to their way of thinking and acting.

What is the Kelley model of covariation?

On the other hand, Kelley’s theory of cognitive covariation also addresses another concept: that of causal schemas (that is why it is also called Kelley’s model of covariation and configuration). This other concept in Kelley’s theory, called “configuration,” is about the information that comes from a single observation (as opposed to covariation, ...

What are the three types of causal attributions?

Depending on the combination of these three elements, we can make a causal attribution to the person, the entity or the circumstances. Thus, in the theory of cognitive covariation, there can be three types of causal attributions: 1. Causal attribution to the person. When the consensus is low ...

What is the covariation model?

Harold Kelley 's covariation model (1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) is an attribution theory in which people make causal inferences to explain why other people and ourselves behave in a certain way. It is concerned with both social perception and self-perception (Kelley, 1973).

What is the covariation of behavior across different people?

Consensus is the co-variation of behavior across different people. If many people find Lisa attractive, consensus is high. If only Arnold finds Lisa attractive, consensus is low. High consensus is attributed to the stimulus (in the above example, to Lisa), while low consensus is attributed to the person (in this case, Arnold).

What is the covariation of behavior across time?

Consistency . Consistency is the covariation of behavior across time. If Jane is generous all the time, she shows high consistency. If Jane is rarely generous or is generous only at specific times, perhaps around the holidays, she shows low consistency.

What are the limitations of Kelley's covariation model?

Kelley's covariation model also has its limitations. The critique of the model mainly concerns the lack of distinction between intentional and unintentional behavior , and between reason and cause explanations (Malle, 1999).

What is distinctiveness in psychology?

Distinctiveness refers to how unique the behavior is to the particular situation. There is a low distinctiveness if an individual behaves similarly in all situations, and there exists a high distinctiveness when the person only shows the behaviour in particular situations.

What is intentional behavior?

Intentional behavior occurs when there is a desire for an outcome, together with a belief that a certain behavior will lead to the desired outcome. These beliefs and desires are mental states acting as reasons behind an intention to act.

What is causal schema?

A causal schema refers to the way a person thinks about plausible causes in relation to a given effect. It provides him or her with the means of making causal attributions when the information provided is limited. The three causal schemata recognized by Kelley are Multiple Sufficient Causes, Multiple Necessary Causes, and Causal Schema for Compensatory Causes (Kelley, 1973).

What is the covariation model?

The whole idea behind the Covariation Model is that we have multiple points of data to form a correlation and come to a conclusion. But what if we don’t know someone that well? What if we’re on a first date, and trying to determine whether the date ordering a tequila shot was a sign of their tendency to party or a bundle of nerves?

What conclusion do we make according to Kelley's Covariation Model?

The conclusion that we make, according to Kelley’s Covariation Model, is that of situational or dispositional attribution. When do we decide that a behavior comes from someone’s character, and when do we decide that the behavior is just an anomaly, influenced by external factors?

What factors did Kelley believe we rely on?

Kelley believed that we rely on three factors: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Based on what the “data” tell us about these factors, we come to a conclusion. In a way, Kelley’s Covariation Model suggests that we are all psychologists, using data and research to come to conclusions about human behavior.

Which of the following leads us to come to the conclusion that the behavior has a Dispositional Attribution?

Low Consensus, Low Distinctiveness, and High Consistency lead us to come to the conclusion that the behavior has a Dispositional Attribution.

What is the first factor in a person's behavior?

The first factor is consensus . How does a person behave in relation to the people around them? If their friends jumped off a bridge, would they follow, or would they stray from the pack? Based on the answer, we attribute a high consensus or low consensus to the behavior.

What is attribution theory?

Again, attribution theory looks at one big idea: what we attribute to other people’s behaviors. In other words, how do we determine the cause of another person’s behavior? Do we think the guy who gave us side-eye on the bus is a jerk, or is he just having a bad day? Is the guy who gave us side-eye on the bus a jerk, or did we do something to offend him?

What is covariation in statistics?

Covariation reflects whether deviations of elemental variables from their average across trial values covary in a way that reduces the effect of noise in individual elemental variables on performance.

Who introduced the covariation principle?

Covariation Principle. ‘Covariation principle’ was introduced by Harold Kelley who defined it as attribution of an effect to one of its possible causes with which it covaries over a period time. Covariation principle applies to the situations in which the attributors observed or noticed the effect two or more times.

What is the theory of causal induction?

The fundamental idea underlying the Humean or covariation approach is that our sensory input, which is the ultimate source of all information that we have, does not explicitly include causal relations. It follows that acquired causal relations must be computed from the sensory input in some way. Our sensory input clearly yields such information as the presence and absence of a candidate cause and of the effect, and the temporal and spatial relations between the two. Treating such observable information as the input to the process of causal induction, models based on the covariation approach attempt in some way to assess covariation between a candidate cause and the effect (i.e., the extent to which the two vary together). An influential model of covariation was proposed by Jenkins and Ward (1965). Interpreting their contingency model in causal terms, the covariation between effect e and candidate cause i is defined by

How does the covariation principle affect attribution?

Influence of number of creators on attributions may be a good example for the covariation principle in terms of consensus. The greater the number of creators, the higher the consensus and the more likely it is to be attributed to an external cause. Thus, when two or more scientists work on the same product independently, the consensus is higher than when it is made by only one scientist. Multiple creations are attributed less internally than single creations. In addition, if the multiple creators report the same creation at nearly the same time, the consensus will be higher, so the creation is attributed to more external causes. If two or more creators work on the same product at the same time, consensus is again higher than for single creations, so the creativity is attributed to external causes.

Why is misrepresentation possible in outcome-directed mental representation?

In outcome-directed mental representation, misrepresentation is made possible because the content of the mentally represented action-oriented instructions remains the same, no matter what happens in the rest of the action-generating system. So, in the case of genetic coding, we need it to be the case that the content of the represented instructions remains the same, no matter what happens in the rest of the developmental system. A dramatic illustration of the intuitive plausibility of cross-context content within biological systems comes from some striking experiments due to Halder, Callaerts, and Gehring [1995]. There is a particular gene that plays a causal role in eye development in the mouse. Transfer that gene to the fruitfly Drosophila and it will result in the development of an eye — a compound eye, a fruitfly eye. Indeed, activate the transplanted gene at various sites and one will get a fruitfly eye developing at the different organismic locations in question (e.g., at the usual site of a leg). So, if this gene codes an instruction, the content of that instruction is very plausibly something like ‘build me an eye here’. That's the developmental instruction represented by that gene. 7 Intuitive plausibility aside, the key point here is that we can make sense of intentional representation because we can make sense of the coding element in question having an ‘intended’ effect (which in turn determines the content of the represented instructions), even if that effect doesn't come about. Where information is interpreted merely in terms of systematic causal co-variation, there is no room for this distinction between intended and unintended effects, hence the fact that causal information concepts fall prey to the thalidomide counter-example discussed earlier. As Griffiths [2001] notes, the notion of intentional information can handle this case, since growing only rudimentary limbs is not one of the intended effects of the genes concerned. But while the idea of the intended effect of a representation might seem straightforward enough in the case of human utterances, exactly how are we to secure that idea in the case of genes? It's here that the appeal to selection comes in. Intended effects are identified by reference to the developmental contribution for which the gene/genes in question was/were selected. So, there is some justification for the claim that an appeal to selection may secure the appropriate sort of informational content for genetic representations. (Whether or not it is the only way to secure such content is another issue — see below.)

Why do genes code for traits?

Here's a seductive first shot: genes code for traits because they causally co-vary with traits. In other words, appropriate causal co-variation is sufficient for genetic representation. One reason why this suggestion is provisionally attractive is that it makes contact with well-established views from elsewhere in science and philosophy that treat information in purely causal terms, or at least that might be used to explicate such an idea. Thus, at a first pass, causal information might, in part, be cashed out by way of mathematical information theory [ Shannon and Weaver, 1949 ], according to which (roughly) the quantity of information in a system is identified with the amount of order in that system. I say ‘in part’ because, strictly speaking, Shannon information supposes only correlation rather than causal correlation, so the causal nature of the correlation is an extra feature. I say ‘at a first pass’ because, for the purposes of genetic information, where we mostly want to talk about the content of the information in a system, rather than how much of it there is, the notion of causal information is more usefully explicated in the light of Dretske's [1981] influential philosophical treatment. Here is the resulting picture. Where there exists a sending system and a receiving system, connected by a channel such that the state of one system is causally related, in a systematic way, to the state of the other, then we have a signal — a flow of information — between the two systems. The causal information content of the signal is the source with which it is reliably correlated. This account is straightforwardly adapted such that entities carry information about causally downstream states with which they co-vary.

What is considered creative when two creators create the same number of products?

Hence, if two creators create the same number of products, but one's products are in different domains, he or she is considered more creative than the other. Even within a domain, if people use different styles, materials, etc., they are considered more creative than others who use the same styles or same materials.

What is the Covariation Model of Attribution?

Harold Kelley's Covariation Model of Attribution explains how we use social perception to attribute behavior to internal or external factors. It also explains what information we gather through perception and how it's used to form a judgment about someone's behavior. The word 'covariation' refers to your ability to observe how two or more variables change in relation to each other. This attribution theory assumes that you have information from multiple experiences (at different places and times) that you use to determine what variables have changed and what has stayed the same.

What are the three variables that Kelley proposes to use to answer this question?

These three variables are consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency .

Why is distinctiveness variable high?

So, distinctiveness is high for your friend's behavior because it is distinct from normal behavior in any other location.

What is Ch 4.?

Ch 4. The Self in a Social Context

Do multiple people behave the same way in the same situation?

The consensus variable answers the question, do multiple people behave the same way in the same situation? If the answer is yes, then consensus is high. If the answer is no, then consensus is low. Think about you and your friend in the restaurant. Are other people in the restaurant also eating three stacks of pancakes? You look around and see that everyone who has pancakes has three stacks, just like your friend. So, consensus is high for your friend's behavior.

What is the covariation of an effect with persons called?

Information about the covariation of an effect with persons is called consensus. If the effect covaries with the person (only Person 1 succeeds at Task 1, and Persons 2, 3, and 4 fail), there is low consensus (the manipulation of the independent variable “person” results in a change of the dependent variable).

What is the Kelley covariation model?

Harold Kelley’s covariation model is a central model within attribution theory, an area of social psychology that is concerned with the scientific analysis of the psychology of everyday people. Attribution theory was originally introduced by Fritz Heider in 1958 and assumes that we all want to understand ...

What is Kelley's model of explanation?

Kelley’s model applies to all types of psychological effects that laypersons explain, ranging from achievement outcomes ...

How does Kelley's experiment work?

In such experiments, independent and dependent variables are differentiated . For instance, a researcher investigating the influence of color on mood will manipulate color as the independent variable (e.g., putting half of the participants in a blue room and the other half in a red room). Subsequently, she assesses, as the dependent vari-able, participants’ mood in both rooms. In such experiments, the independent variables are often conceived of as causes or determinants of the dependent variables (e.g., color might be conceived of as a determinant of mood), and the dependent variables are the effects.

Distinctiveness

Psychodynamics is another type of covariation information that is important in the effort of understanding the causes of social behaviour. Distinctiveness refers to how unique the psychodynamics is to the particular situation.

Consistency

Consistency is the continuous behaviour of something. For example, if Mrs. Browning's 3rd period class maintains a continuous behavior of growing the friendship of Kate and Jane, this is consistency.

Making attribution with the three sources of information

By putting the three sources of information, consensus, distinctiveness and consistency, together, we are able to determine whether a person would likely to make an attribution to object, person or context (Orvis et al., 1975).

Limitations

Kelley’s covariation model also has its limitations. The critique of the model mainly concerns the lack of distinction between intentional and unintentional behavior, and between reason and cause explanations (Malle, 1999).

Overview

See more on optimistminds.com

Consensus

Distinctiveness

Consistency

Harold Kelley's covariation model (1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) is an attribution theory in which people make causal inferences to explain why other people and ourselves behave in a certain way. It is concerned with both social perception and self-perception (Kelley, 1973).
The covariation principle states that, "an effect is attributed to the one of its possible causes with which, over time, it covaries" (Kelley, 1973:108). That is, a certain behaviour is attributed to poten…

Making attributions using consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency

Causal schema

Limitations

Notes