IPA (one philosophical stance toward phenomenology) is about the essence of experience, whereas a Grounded Theory study seeks to understand process, and develop an explanatory framework, or "theory" for the contextually bound process. What method is used in grounded theory analysis?
What is interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)?
Whereas, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis is an idiographic and inductive method that outlines the method by which we can analyze our data (i.e. Participants' lived experiences) and create an understanding of the phenomena that emerge. IPA has been informed by Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, and Idiography.
What is the difference between phenomenology and research?
Phenomenology is both a philosophy and a research method. As a philosophical study, phenomenology refers to the study of the structures of experience and consciousness. In the field of research, it refers to a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants.
What does an IPA study look like?
Usually, participants in an IPA study are expected to have certain experiences in common with one another: the small-scale nature of a basic IPA study shows how something is understood in a given context, and from a shared perspective, a method sometimes called homogeneous sampling.
What is the difference between IPA and HP in philosophy?
I would say that to begin, HP is a methodology, a semi unified approach that includes an epistemology, ontology, and method. IPA however is merely an analytic method. Granted, its underlying philosophical foundation is that of HP. As far as the outcome of the research both aspire to provide a rich description of lived experience.
Is IPA the same as phenomenology?
IPA is phenomenological in that it wishes to explore an individual's personal perception or account of an event or state as opposed to attempting to produce an objective record of the event or state itself.
What's the difference between IPA and thematic analysis?
IPA has a dual focus on the unique characteristics of individual participants (the idiographic focus mentioned above) and on patterning of meaning across participants. In contrast, TA focuses mainly on patterning of meaning across participants (this is not to say it can't capture difference and divergence in data).
What is the difference between hermeneutic and phenomenology?
Phenomenology describes how one orients to lived experience, hermeneutics describes how one interprets the 'texts' of lived experience and semiotics is used to develop a practical writing or linguistic approach to the methodologies of phenomenology and hermeneutics.
Why is IPA good for qualitative research?
Therefore, utilizing the IPA approach in a qualitative research study reiterates the fact that its main objective and essence are to explore the 'lived experiences' of the research participants and allow them to narrate the research findings through their 'lived experiences'.
What is the study of phenomenology?
A phenomenological study explores what people experienced and focuses on their experience of a phenomena. As phenomenology has a strong foundation in philosophy, it is recommended that you explore the writings of key thinkers such as Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Merleau-Ponty before embarking on your research.
What is meant by phenomenological approach?
The phenomenological approach is a form of qualitative enquiry that emphasizes experiential, lived aspects of a particular construct – that is, how the phenomenon is experienced at the time that it occurs, rather than what is thought about this experience or the meaning ascribed to it subsequently.
What are the three types of phenomenology?
This research limits itself by focusing on three main approaches in phenomenology: Husserl's transcendental phenomenology; Heidegger's hermeneutical phenomenology; and Merleau-Ponty's idea of perception.
What is an example of hermeneutic phenomenology?
Abstract. Hermeneutic phenomenology is a research method used in qualitative research in the fields of education and other human sciences, for example nursing science. It is a widely used method example in Scandinavia, and Van Manen is well known for his hermeneutic phenomenological method.
What are the basic principles and concepts of hermeneutics and phenomenology?
Basic themes of hermeneutic phenomenology are “interpretation,” “textual meaning,” “dialogue,” “preunderstanding,” and “tradition.” Heidegger, Gadamer, and Ricoeur are the foremost representatives of the movement of hermeneutic phenomenology.
What is IPA qualitative research?
Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is a qualitative form of psychology research. IPA has an idiographic focus, which means that instead of producing generalization findings, it aims to offer insights into how a given person, in a given context, makes sense of a given situation.
What is an example of phenomenological research?
Examples Of Phenomenological Research The experiences of every war survivor or war veteran are unique. Research can illuminate their mental states and survival strategies in a new world. Losing family members to Covid-19 hasn't been easy.
What is the goal of phenomenology?
The goal of phenomenology is to describe the meaning of this experience—both in terms of what was experienced and how it was experienced [6]. There are different kinds of phenomenology, each rooted in different ways of conceiving of the what and how of human experience.
Do you use thematic analysis in IPA?
Thematic analysis is not a methodology. It is a method/design approach to qualitative data analysis alone. You could have both in your study. IPA has its own data analysis steps - aligned more with hermeneutics - but it is acceptable to use an IPA framework and adopt Braun and Clark's step-wise thematic analysis.
What is the difference between thematic analysis and content analysis?
Thematic analysis helps researchers understand those aspects of a phenomenon that participants talk about frequently or in depth, and the ways in which those aspects of a phenomenon may be connected. Content analysis, on the other hand, can be used as a quantitative or qualitative method of data analysis.
What are the different types of thematic analysis?
There are three types of thematic analysis: Coding reliability thematic analysis. Codebook thematic analysis. Reflexive thematic analysis.
What is thematic analysis?
Thematic analysis is a method for analyzing qualitative data that entails searching across a data set to identify, analyze, and report repeated patterns (Braun and Clarke 2006). It is a method for describing data, but it also involves interpretation in the processes of selecting codes and constructing themes.
What is interpretative phenomenological analysis?
Interpretative phenomenological analysis is a more narrow term and it indicates a particular method of qualitative analysis of data that originates in the broader hermeneutic phenomenological movement. Cite.
What is the difference between HP and IPA?
However, HP, following Husserl, seeks the essence of the experience at focus while IPA seeks simply seeks to explicate how some kind of people experience a specific experience.
What is hermeneutic phenomenology?
Hermeneutic Phenomenology is a phenomenological approach focused on interpreting to generate sense of individual's subjective lived experience. The meaning making is undertaken through a hermeneutic circle in which horizons of understanding between the researcher and participants are fused together to provide a broader understanding of a specific phenomenon under investigation. However, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) although considered as a methodology, it is best suitable to be used as an analysis strategy of phenomenolgical data. IPA is embedded in hermeneutic phenomenology to enable a researcher engage into meaning making.
What is the difference between epistemology and ontology?
What I understand from what I have studied about Ontology and Epistemology is that Ontology is knowing the reality. This reality can also be something that we are going to prove or our view point towards the reality. Whereas Epistemology is the study of how can we prove the view point or carry out the study in order to prove our view point which will contribute towards reality.
Who carried forward Jacob's hermeneutic phenomenology?
Jacob, Hermeneutic Phenomenology, I suggest, was a departure from Husserl, carried forward by Heidegger, Gadamer and Ricoeur - though I suppose it depends on what you mean by 'understanding'! Regards, Tony.
Is HP an IPA?
I would say that to begin, HP is a methodology, a semi unified approach that includes an epistemology, ontology, and method. IPA however is merely an analytic method. Granted, its underlying philosophical foundation is that of HP.
Is hermeneutic phenomenology broader than phenomenological hermeneutics?
I would put it little bit differently. Hermeneutic phenomenology is a much broader term (sometimes it can appear alongside the term phenomenological hermeneutics: the differences are philosophically important and it is about which part of the two is more relevant: interpretative process itself (hermeneutic circle) or grasping the essences of the phenomena). I would reserve the term hermeneutic phenomenology for the philosophical-intellectual movement. Interpretative phenomenological analysis is a more narrow term and it indicates a particular method of qualitative analysis of data that originates in the broader hermeneutic phenomenological movement.
What is Phenomenology?
Unlike the case study, Phenomenology, is a philosophical approach as well as a methodology. The influence it had on various social sciences is massive. For instance, it was able to influence the philosophical trends of Sociology as well as Psychology. Phenomenology was mainly developed by Alfred Schutz, Peter Burger, and Luckmann. Schutz emphasized that people take everyday realities for granted. He further states that the role of the researcher should be to analyze these realities so that he can understand the meanings that people allocate for various phenomena in the society.
What is the Difference Between Case Study and Phenomenology?
Case Study: A case study can be defined as a research method that is used to investigate an individual, a group of people or an event.
What is the difference between phenomenology and case study?
One of the key differences between a case study and phenomenology that one can identify is that a case study is a research method that allows the researcher to comprehend an individual, a group or else a particular event. Phenomenology, on the other hand, is a methodology as well as a philosophy. In Phenomenology, attention is paid to ...
What is the research methodology that explores the lived experiences of people as well as the structures of meaning?
Phen omenology: Phenomenology is a research methodology as well as a philosophy that explores the lived experiences of people as well as the structures of meaning.
What is the term for a philosophy as well as a methodology used mainly in the social sciences?
Phenomenology: Phenomenology is a philosophy as well as a methodology used mainly in the social sciences.
What is the philosophy of phenomenology?
Phenomenology: Phenomenology is a philosophy as well as a methodology used to understand the subjective human experiences.
Who developed phenomenology?
This was developed by Alfred Schutz, Peter Burger, and Luckmann. Through phenomenology, Schutz pointed out that meanings are produced and also sustained by individuals in the society. He also believed that the taken ...
What is the Difference Between Grounded Theory and Phenomenology?
Grounded Theory: Grounded theory is a qualitative research methodology where the theory emerges from within the data.
What is grounded theory phenomenology?
Grounded theory and phenomenology are both methodologies used in the social sciences. Grounded theory specifically refers to a methodology used by many researchers.
Is phenomenology qualitative or quantitative?
Phenomenology: Phenomenology is also a qualitative research approach.
Is phenomenology a methodology?
Phenomenology, on the other hand, is not merely a methodology but also a philosophy that pays attention to the subjective realities of people and their interpretations. Through this article let us examine the differences between Grounded Theory and Phenomenology.
What is phenomenology research?
Phenomenology is both a philosophy and a research method. As a philosophical study, phenomenology refers to the study of the structures of experience and consciousness. In the field of research, it refers to a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants.
How is data collected in phenomenology?
Data is collected in phenomenology through long and intensive, semi-structured or unstructured personal interviews. The researcher may also have to conduct several interview sessions with each participant since phenomenology relies heavily on interviews. However, the information gathered through these interviews may also depend on the interviewing skills of the researcher and the articulate skills of the participants. This is a limitation of this method.
What is the difference between phenomenology and case study?
As a research methodology, the main difference between case study and phenomenology is that case study is an in-depth and detailed investigation of the development of a single event, situation, or an individual over a period of time whereas phenomenology is a study that is designed to understand the subjective, lived experiences and perspectives of participants.
Is ethnography a case study?
Ethnographies are also considered as a type of case studies. Although case studies offer detailed and in-depth information about a particular phenomenon, it is difficult to use this information to form generalization since they only focus on a single phenomenon.
Who influenced the development of phenomenology?
Differences. Phenomenology emerged from philosophy, primarily influenced by Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger; it aims to describe and explore experiences, which can only be done by collecting data from individuals who have lived through those experiences.
What is the purpose of grounded theorists and phenomenologists?
In brief, grounded theorists and phenomenologists both seek to explore individuals’ experiences in the context of the worlds in which they live . Because both approaches have so much in common it can sometimes be difficult to differentiate between them.
What is interpretivist approach?
Both take an interpretivist approach in which the researcher seeks to explore real-life situations, and require a high degree of interaction between the researcher and the individual, groups or situations being examined; this usually takes the form of interviews and/or observations. Both grounded theorists and phenomenologists seek to collect ...
What is IPA in psychology?
IPA is one of several approaches to qualitative, phenomenological psychology. It is distinct from other approaches, in part, because of its combination of psychological, interpretative, and idiographic components.
What is IPA study?
This means that the researcher generates codes from the data, rather than using a pre-existing theory to identify codes that might be applied to the data. IPA studies do not test theories, then, but they are often relevant to the development of existing theories.
What is interpretative phenomenological analysis?
Interpretative phenomenological analysis ( IPA) is an approach to psychological qualitative research with an idiographic focus, which means that it aims to offer insights into how a given person, in a given context, makes sense of a given phenomenon. Usually these phenomena relate to experiences of some personal significance, such as a major life event, or the development of an important relationship. It has its theoretical origins in phenomenology and hermeneutics, and key ideas from Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty are often cited. IPA is one of several approaches to qualitative, phenomenological psychology. It is distinct from other approaches, in part, because of its combination of psychological, interpretative, and idiographic components.
What makes an IPA study good?
In IPA, a good analysis is one that balances phenomenological description with insightful interpretation and anchors these interpretations in the participants' accounts. It is also likely to maintain an idiographic focus (so that particular variation are not lost), and to keep a close focus on meaning (rather than say, causal relations). A degree of transparency (contextual detail about the sample, a clear account of the process, adequate commentary on the data, key points illustrated by verbatim quotes) is also crucial to estimating the plausibility and transferability of an IPA study. Engagement with credibility issues (such as cross-validation, cooperative inquiry, independent audit, or triangulation) is also likely to increase the reader's confidence.
What is IPA research?
In IPA, researchers gather qualitative data from research participants using techniques such as interview, diaries, or focus group . Typically, these are approached from a position of flexible and open-ended inquiry, and the interviewer adopts a stance which is curious and facilitative (rather than, say, challenging and interrogative). IPA usually requires personally-salient accounts of some richness and depth, and it requires that these accounts be captured in a way which permits the researcher to work with a detailed verbatim transcript.
How many participants are needed for an IPA study?
Most frequently they draw on the accounts of a small number of people (6 has been suggested as a good number, although anywhere between 3 and 15 participants for a group study can be acceptable ).
Why use IPA?
One might use IPA if one had a research question which aimed to understand what a given experience was like (phenomenology) and how someone made sense of it (interpretation). Analysis in IPA is said to be 'bottom-up.'.