Knowledge Builders

what is the main difference between the social contract in hobbes and locke

by Antoinette Leffler MD Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Locke believed that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that if you simply do what you are told, you are safe.

Full Answer

Why is Hobbes better than Locke?

Hobbes and Locke on the Issue of Equality Compare and Contrast Essay

  • Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes was born into continent embroiled in a bloody civil war. ...
  • Locke. When Locke began to write down his ideas, the world has undergone a tremendous transformation as it tried to break away from its mediaeval past.
  • Conclusion. ...
  • Works Cited. ...

What was the difference between Hobbes and Locke?

The main difference between the two personalities was about their idea of government. Hobbes believed in absolutism, meaning a single person should hold complete power. Locke, on the other hand, believed in the concept of constitutionalism that is every person should have various rights that they can use if they are being illtreated, both physically or mentally.

What are the similarities between Locke and Hobbes?

of similarities and differences between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. They are both very important. They both have the idea of a natural government of mankind which is very similar. They believe in social contract which is when you do actions that will affect you and you will accept the consequences.

What did Hobbes mean by a social contract?

xo8 HOBBES AND LOCKE: THE SOCIAL CONTRACT prise the definition of any form of government or the choice of governors. You may also suppose an agreement to establish a particular form of government and bear faith to it; and this may comprise a mutual agreement between rulers and subjects. This is a covenant of allegiance, pactum subiectionis.

See more

What is the difference between the social contracts of Hobbes and Locke?

Hobbes believed that the social contract was designed to invest absolute power in a ruler to govern the citizenry. Locke believed that the social contract meant investing some power in the hands of the ruler, whose power would be used to protect his citizens' human rights.

What are the differences between Hobbes and Locke?

Hobbes was a proponent of Absolutism, a system which placed control of the state in the hands of a single individual, a monarch free from all forms of limitations or accountability. Locke, on the other hand, favored a more open approach to state-building.

In what two ways did Locke disagree with Hobbes ideas about the social contract?

He also agreed that a social contract was needed to assure peace. But he disagreed with Hobbes on two major points. First, Locke argued that natural rights such as life, liberty, and property existed in the state of nature. He believed they could never be taken away or even voluntarily given up by individuals.

What was John Locke's social contract?

In simple terms, Locke's social contract theory says: government was created through the consent of the people to be ruled by the majority, “(unless they explicitly agree on some number greater than the majority),” and that every man once they are of age has the right to either continue under the government they were ...

How were Hobbes and Locke different quizlet?

Terms in this set (5) Locke: Man is by nature a social animal. Hobbes: Man is not by nature a social animal, society could not exist except by the power of the state. What do they think about conflict? Locke: Peace is the norm, and should be the norm.

What was Thomas Hobbes view on social contract?

Hobbes was one of the earliest western philosophers to count women as persons when devising a social contract among persons. He insists on the equality of all people, very explicitly including women. People are equal because they are all subject to domination, and all potentially capable of dominating others.

What is the social contract theory of Thomas Hobbes?

Social Contract Theory, Drafted by Hobbes One person in the state of nature would eventually gain enough power that others will begin to follow them in exchange for safety from others. A multitude of smaller groups like this would crop up but eventually would be conquered by a sole individual.

What is the difference between Hobbes and Locke state of nature?

For instance, Locke perceives the law of nature to preside over the state of nature, in which individuals and their properties are not necessarily in constant danger. Conversely, Hobbes's state of nature is the state of war, which cause men to come to the conclusion that they must always be in pursuit of peace.

What is the difference between Hobbes and Locke state of nature?

For instance, Locke perceives the law of nature to preside over the state of nature, in which individuals and their properties are not necessarily in constant danger. Conversely, Hobbes's state of nature is the state of war, which cause men to come to the conclusion that they must always be in pursuit of peace.

What did Hobbes and Locke have in common?

Locke and Hobbes both share a vision of the social contract as instrumental in a state's political stability. However, their respective philosophies were informed by a starkly contrasting vision of human nature.

What did Hobbes and Locke believe in?

Both Hobbes and Locke supported the theory of social contract which maintains that the governments and political powers do not derive from God, and the rulers do not originate from divine power, but are assigned by people.

How do Locke's view of human nature and Hobbes view differ?

Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature. Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite.

What is the difference between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?

Differences between the social contract theory of john locke and thomas hobbes. The concept of social contract theory is that in the beginning man lived in the state of nature. They had no government and there was no law to regulate them. There were hardships and oppression on the sections of the society. To overcome from these hardships they ...

Why is property the linchpin of Locke's argument for the social contract and civil government?

Property is the linchpin of Locke? s argument for the social contract and civil government because it is the protection of their property, including their property in their own bodies, that men seek when they decide to abandon the State of Nature. ?

Which theory of social contract supports absolute sovereign without giving any value to individuals?

Hobbes theory of Social Contract supports absolute sovereign without giving any value to individuals, while Locke and Rousseau supports individual than the state or the government. 4. To Hobbes, the sovereign and the government are identical but Rousseau makes a distinction between the two. He rules out a representative form of government.

Which two philosophers argued that the state exists?

COMPARISION OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONTRACT OF THOMAS HOBBES, JOHN LOCKE AND JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU 1. Hobbes asserts that without subjection to a common power of their rights and freedoms, men are necessarily at war. Locke and Rousseau, on the contrary, set forth the view that the state exists to preserve and protect the natural rights ...

What is the majority of Rousseau's theory?

The majority was accepted on the belief that majority view is right than minority view. Each individual is not subject to any other individual but to the ? general will? and to obey this is to obey himself. His sovereignty is infallible, indivisible, unrepresentable and illimitable. ? Thus, Rousseau favoured people’s sovereignty. His natural law theory is confined to the freedom and liberty of the individual. For him, State, law, sovereignty, general will, etc. are interchangeable terms. Rousseau? s theory inspired French and American revolutions and given impetus to nationalism. He based his theory of social contract on the principle of ?

What is Rousseau's theory of general will?

The essence of the Rousseau? s theory of General Will is that State and Law were the product of General Will of the people. State and the Laws are made by it and if the government and laws do not conform to ? general will? , they would be discarded. While the individual parts with his natural rights, in return he gets civil liberties such as freedom of speech, equality, assembly, etc. Page 6 of 7 ? The ? General Will? , therefore, for all purposes, was the will of majority citizens to which blind obedience was to be given.

What was the pivotal moment in the evolution of humankind?

Such leisure time inevitably led people to make comparisons between themselves and others, resulting in public values, leading to shame and envy, pride and contempt. Most importantly however, according to Rousseau, was the invention of private property, which constituted the pivotal moment in humanity? s evolution out of a simple, pure state into one, characterized by greed, competition, vanity, inequality, and vice.

What did Locke argue about the rights of individuals?

Locke also argued that individuals have a moral duty and rational interest to preserve their rights.

What did Hobbes see in the formation of a state?

Instead of a top-down subjugation, Hobbes saw the formation of a state as a collective approach in which people willingly and rationally gave up some of their freedoms in exchange for protection from the kind of anarchy he so dreaded. All of civilization, arts, engineering, letters, etc., was built on this fundamental premise.

What did John Locke do?

As an adult, Locke worked in medicine as well as parliamentary politics under the patronage of Anthony Ashley Cooper, known as Lord Ashley and one of the founders of the English Whig movement , which sought to continue the struggle against Absolute Monarchism after the 1660 Restoration of the Stuart Dynasty. Like Hobbes, Locke also briefly faced ...

What did Locke believe?

Like Hobbes, Locke believed that people were ultimately rational actors who sought to avoid violent conflict wherever possible, and so in such a situation, opposing sides consented to allow a third party to mediate the case, let them deliver a verdict of their own, and agree to hold by that verdict.

Which two philosophers were proponents of Absolutism?

Hobbes and Locke each stood on fundamentally opposing corners in their debate on what made the most effective form of government for society. Hobbes was a proponent of Absolutism, a system which placed control of the state in the hands of a single individual, a monarch free from all forms of limitations or accountability.

Why do people not submit to higher authority?

For Hobbes, people do not submit to a higher authority because it is naturally stronger than they are. Hobbes’ State of Nature is so chaotic precisely because people are essentially equal and will perform the same actions in their self-interest.

Who painted John Locke?

Portrait of John Locke by Godfrey Kneller circa 1697.

What did Locke and Hobbes believe about the social contract?

Furthermore, the stand on the social contract is different in Locke and Hobbes’ philosophies. Locke believe d that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that ...

What is the social contract according to Locke?

Regarding the social contract – according to Locke, man has the right to life and just and impartial protection. According to Hobbes, if man simply does what he is told, he is safe. Author. Recent Posts.

What is the difference between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?

Difference Between Locke and Hobbes. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were known as social contract theorists as well as natural law theorists. However, they are both completely different in terms of their stand and conclusions in several laws of nature. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher from Malmesbury.

How did Hobbes become famous?

He became famous when his book, “Leviathan,” laid the foundation of Western political philosophy. Hobbes garnered recognition in several areas; he was the champion of absolutism for the sovereign, but greatly contributed to many other subjects as well, including ethics, geometry, physics of gases, theology, and even political science. ...

Why won't you violate the social contract?

You will not violate the social contract because you do not have the right to rebel. 1. Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists. 2. The two philosophers had different educational backgrounds. Hobbes was a known English philosopher from Malmesbury.

What did John Locke contribute to?

Additionally, he was one of the first few empiricists in Britain. He even greatly contributed to the American Declaration of Independence, focusing on the classical republicanism and liberal theory. John Locke obtained his education at a prestigious institution in London – Westminster School.

What did Locke believe about the state of nature?

When it comes to the issue of the state of nature, Locke believed that in that state, men are usually true to their word and fulfill their obligations. He used the American frontier and Soldania as his examples of individuals in the state of nature; they showed that peace and property rights could co-exist harmoniously.

Why are the men linked together by their ideas of a social contract?

Of course it is obvious that the men are linked together by their ideas of a social contract because they have built upon each other. What is significant about this similarity is that, although not all three men have similar views on how the government is formed, but they all have similar ideas on the underlying concept of why government should be formed and a social contract established. This is essentially to protect and preserve the rights of man in some way which somehow preserves mans existence. Hobbes feels that mans craving for power and natural state of war is controlled by the social contract, therefore maintaining mans existence.

What does Hobbes believe about the state of war?

Hobbes feels that mans craving for power and natural state of war is controlled by the social contract, therefore maintaining mans existence. “ the final cause, or end design of men (who naturally love liberty, and dominion over others) in the introduction of that restraint upon themselves (in which we see them live in commonwealths) ...

What does Rousseau mean by "Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains"?

” (On the Social Contract, Book 1 Ch. 1). This means that it is actually civilization that corrupted man and not his natural state.

Why is the social contract so appealing?

The Social Contract is also appealing because the idea of security is absolutely essential in society because all man wants to feel safe in society- this is an absolutely plausible idea because it is evident in society that people indeed want security. It seems like they desire security for all the reasons of which Hobbes, ...

Who developed the social contract?

The Social Contract: Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. The three philosophers, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were three key thinkers of political philosophy. The three men helped develop the social contract theory into what it is in this modern day and age. The social contract theory was the creation of Hobbes who created ...

Do all men have different positions on the political spectrum?

Although all men sit in different positions on the theoretical political spectrum, which is derived from their work on the Social Contract Theory, they carry both similar and differential ideas (it can be argued where each man rests depending on who may be analyzing their work, but for the most part their position is clear).

What is the social contract of Locke and Hobbes?

Locke and Hobbes both share a vision of the social contract as instrumental in a state's political stability. However, their respective philosophies were informed by a starkly contrasting vision of human nature. This essay explores the historical context of each philosopher and considers the differences in the social contractual theory that emerged from their distinct perspectives on the state of nature.

Who is the most important proponent of social contract theory?

The notion of the social contract has been, quite simply, one of the most important paradigms of Western philosophical and legal theory in helping to shape our understanding of justice and social structure.1 Sharing some elements of thought, though differing in many more, 17th century Englishmen Thomas Hobbes and John Locke stand out as amongst the most significant proponents of social contract theory. Held up against the light of contemporary scrutiny, analysis may expose flaws and weaknesses in their arguments. However, even more so it reveals that the sophisticated methods they employed, the scope and structure in their observations of complex, ubiquitous principles, and the depth of their impact in modern thinking ascribes them undeniable stature and demonstrates the enduring value we can still gain from reviewing and comparing their work on social contract theory.

What is John Locke's theory of social contract?

John Locke's theory of social contract: John Locke had a different viewpoint on the state of nature of man as well as the resulting conclusion that he drew about the form of government needed by the people. He was less pessimistic than Hobbes and his writings show the beginning of liberal thought. In his "two treatises on civil government" Locke ...

What were the main differences between Locke's philosophy and that of Thomas Hobbes?

This, and Locke's conception of a less selfish state of nature of man were the main differences between his philosophy and that of Thomas Hobbes.

What did Thomas Hobbes believe about the monarchy?

He came to the conclusion that since the main need of the people was stability the government should be in such a way that it has the best stability. For this he said that a monarchy was the best solution. He explained his theory of social contract in the book, 'the Leviathan'.

What did Hobbes propose?

Hobbes proposed a solution that all men would mutually agree to give up all their rights to one single individual, and that individual be given powers to create and protect law and order for the people.

What is the function of the king in the monarchy?

There the king's function is only state related and the government can be overthrown. There the sovereignty is of people and not of the king. The king enters into contract with the people and the protection of the right to ownership of private property was the reason for abandoning the state of nature to form a society under an authority. However, unlike Hobbes, Locke believed that when the institution of monarchy dissolved into tyranny, the social contract was void and the people could revolt against the monarch's authority .

How did the three social contract theories help develop the social contract theory?

The three of them helped to develop the social contract theory in its present day form. They lived one after the other and each developed his ideas basing on his own viewpoints and biases as well as the influences from the ideas popular at the time they lived.

What is social contract?

The social contract is one of the most important philosophies behind the formation of governments in the modern world. Its principles are used for the functioning of nearly every true democracy today. Its main principle is the consent of the subjects to be ruled by the rulers. This is also the main difference between it and ...

1.What is the difference between the idea of the "social …

Url:https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/43126/what-is-the-difference-between-the-idea-of-the-social-contract-in-hobbes-and-l

4 hours ago The source of differences between Hobbes’ and Locke’ social contracts is their differing conceptions of the state of nature. For Hobbes absolute freedom is all that individuals have in the state of nature. Each can take whatever she wants from others.

2.Differences between the social contract theory of john …

Url:https://lawaspect.com/differences-social-contract-theory-john-locke-thomas-hobbes/

10 hours ago Hobbes theory of Social Contract supports absolute sovereign without giving any value to individuals, while Locke and Rousseau supports individual than the state or the government. 4. To Hobbes, the sovereign and the government are identical but Rousseau makes a distinction between the two.

3.Hobbes, Locke, and the Social Contract - American …

Url:https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/hobbes-locke-and-social-contract

4 hours ago What is the biggest difference between Hobbes and Locke? Major Points of Contrast between Hobbes and Locke Political ideas • Hobbes argued for royal absolutism, while Locke argued for constitutionalism. overthrown, while Locke believed that if the social contract is violated, the governed have the right to overthrow the government.

4.What is the difference between Hobbes's "Social …

Url:https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-Hobbess-Social-Contract-and-Lockes

11 hours ago It can be argued whether their social contract is a literal contract or a hypothetical contract. One key difference between the three thinkers is their differential idea of what the state of nature is. Hobbe’s has a famous quote that defines man in a poor way. “.

5.Difference Between Locke and Hobbes

Url:http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/politics/ideology-politics/difference-between-locke-and-hobbes/

9 hours ago Locke and Hobbes both share a vision of the social contract as instrumental in a state's political stability. However, their respective philosophies were informed by a starkly contrasting vision of human nature. This essay explores the historical context of each philosopher and considers the differences in the social contractual theory that emerged

6.The Social Contract: Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau

Url:https://lawaspect.com/social-contract-hobbes-locke-rousseau/

36 hours ago  · However, unlike Hobbes, Locke believed that when the institution of monarchy dissolved into tyranny, the social contract was void and the people could revolt against the monarch's authority . This, and Locke's conception of a less selfish state of nature of man were the main differences between his philosophy and that of Thomas Hobbes.

7.COMPARING THE SOCIAL CONTRACTS OF HOBBES …

Url:https://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Law/_document/WA-jurist-documents/WAJ_Vol1_2010_Tom-Mouritz---Hobbes-%26-Locke.pdf

22 hours ago Locke believed that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that if you simply do what you are told, you are safe.

8.The Social Contract Theory According To Hobbes, Locke …

Url:https://www.indiastudychannel.com/resources/150471-The-Social-Contract-Theory-According-To-Hobbes-Locke-And-Rousseau.aspx

14 hours ago

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9