See more
What is the philosophy of Churchland about self?
Rather than dualism, Churchland holds to materialism, the belief that nothing but matter exists. When discussing the mind, this means that the physical brain, and not the mind, exists. Adding to this, the physical brain is where we get our sense of self.
What does Churchland argue for?
Although Churchland thinks that reality as a whole is material, in Matter and Consciousness he wants specifically to argue for a materialist concept of the mind or what we might call a “mental materialism.” Of course, Churchland wishes to distinguish his particular version of mental materialism from other mental ...
What is Eliminative materialism according to Paul Churchland?
Eliminative Materialism (1984)* Eliminative materialism (or eliminativism) is the radical claim that our ordinary, common-sense understanding of the mind is deeply wrong and that some or all of. the mental states posited by common-sense do not actually exist.
What is churchlands argument against dualism?
This vulnerability manifests itself in Churchland's third argument against substance dualism, which he calls "the argument from the neural dependence of all known mental phenomena" (20). Churchland is here referring to the effects of drugs and brain damage on reasoning, the emotions, and consciousness.
Who believed that the self is the brain?
Eliminative materialism This view is embodied in the work of philosophers like Paul Churchland, who believes that the mind is the brain and that over time a mature neuroscience vocabulary will replace the “folk psychology” that we currently use to think about our selves and our minds.
What is the purpose of eliminative materialism?
Eliminative materialism (also called eliminativism) is a materialist position in the philosophy of mind. Its primary claim is that people's common-sense understanding of the mind (or folk psychology) is false and that certain classes of mental states that most people believe in do not exist.
What is an example of eliminative materialism?
Eliminativism about a class of entities is the view that the class of entities does not exist. For example, materialism tends to be eliminativist about the soul; modern chemists are eliminativist about phlogiston; and modern physicists are eliminativist about the existence of luminiferous aether.
How do you describe the philosophical self?
The philosophy of self defines the essential qualities that make one person distinct from all others. There have been numerous approaches to defining these qualities. The self is the idea of a unified being which is the source of consciousness.
Why is Patricia Churchland considered a materialist?
Her strength is precisely that she is a rare thinker who can be resolutely scientific without ever being scientistic—a distinction that her critics seem unable to make. She is certainly a materialist who rejects the view that consciousness is some kind of mystery which science should not dare to touch.
Is eliminative materialism convincing?
That is, that you can't pretend to have a scientific truth or a philosophical truth or any kind of truth if the statement that you are making about it doesn't even make sense. Eliminative materialism is self-refuting: If it's true, then it's false.
What does eliminative materialism argue concerning folk psychology?
Eliminative materialists argue that the central tenets of folk psychology radically misdescribe cognitive processes; consequently, the posits of folk psychology have no role to play in a serious scientific theory of the mind because the posits pick out nothing that is real.
What is a propositional belief?
A propositional attitude is a mental state held by an agent toward a proposition. Linguistically, propositional attitudes are denoted by a verb (e.g. "believed") governing an embedded "that" clause, for example, 'Sally believed that she had won'.
What is Paul Churchland's theory of mind?
Paul Churchland is a leading proponent of so-called eliminative materialism in the philosophy of mind. In contrast to a reductive materialism which claims that mental processes are in some way identical with physical processes, eliminative materialism claims that mental processes as traditionally conceived do not exist. Mr. Churchland defends this thesis by arguing that the network of concepts and principles which common sense relies on in explaining mental processes and behaviour is a scientific theory, albeit of a primitive kind.#N#But this network is in fact a poor scientific theory when judged by the normal scientific requirements of predictive and explanatory success. In place of folk psychology Mr. Churchland proposes a theory based on a fusion of neuroscience and artificial intelligence. This naturally requires a fairly detailed consideration of the findings of these disciplines, and Paul Churchland’s work here is smoothly complemented by that of his wife Patricia, whose work tends to have a greater empirical emphasis than his.#N#Critics have objected to a number of aspects of this general programme. Some have argued that folk psychology is not a scientific theory at all, or, that if it is one, it is not a bad one. Other critics have objected that Mr. Churchland's version of materialism is unblc to provide any convincing account either of the intentional states or of mental states with a qualitative ‘feel’ to them.
Who is Paul Churchland?
Paul Montgomery Churchland is a Canadian philosopher known for his studies in neurophilosophy and the philosophy of mind.
What are Professor Churchland's achievements?
Achievements. Professor Churchland has authored several books in philosophy, which have been translated into many languages. Mr. Churchland has written a number of published articles, some of which have been trans lated into other languages , including several that have had a substantial impact in philosophy.
Is folk psychology a scientific theory?
Some have argued that folk psychology is not a scientific theory at all, or, that if it is one, it is not a bad one. Other critics have objected that Mr. Churchland's version of materialism is unblc to provide any convincing account either of the intentional states or of mental states with a qualitative ‘feel’ to them.
What does Paul Churchland believe?
Tossing aside the concept of dualism and the brain, Churchland adheres to materialism, the belief that nothing but matter exists. In other words, if it can't somehow be recognized by the senses then it's akin to a fairy tale.
What does Churchland argue about the mind?
Based on this assertion, Churchland holds to eliminative materialism. Stated simply, eliminative materialism argues that the ordinary folk psychology of the mind is wrong. It is the physical brain and not the imaginary mind that gives us our sense of self.
What is the argument that ordinary folk psychology of the mind is wrong?
Adding to this, the physical brain is where we get our sense of self. This leads to eliminative materialism , the argument that ordinary folk psychology of the mind is wrong. Arguing his point, Churchland points to science, brain injury and evolution.
What is the theory of dualism?
When it comes to discussing human life, dualism is the idea that the mind and the body are separate. In other words, we all have a physical brain, but we also have a separate mind.
Why does the mind exist?
Because the mind is the seat of our consciousness, it's what gives us our identity. No, we can't see it, taste it, or touch it, but it does exist. Not only does it exist, but it is what makes self, self.
Who claims the physical brain is the origin of what we call ourselves?
Using all of these arguments, Churchland claims the physical brain is the origin of what we call self. With this, belief in the mind is rather unnecessary.
Which view of the mind is correct?
Traditional psychology's view of the mind is correct.
What does Churchland believe about neuroscience?
Just as modern science has discarded such notions as legends or witchcraft, Churchland holds the belief that a future, fully matured neuroscience is likely to have no need for "beliefs" (see propositional attitudes ). Such concepts will not merely be reduced to more finely grained explanation and retained as useful proximate levels of description, but will be strictly eliminated as wholly lacking in correspondence to precise objective phenomena, such as activation patterns across neural networks. He points out that the history of science has seen many posits once considered real entities, such as phlogiston, caloric, the luminiferous ether, and vital forces, thus eliminated. In The Engine of Reason, The Seat of the Soul Churchland hypothesizes that consciousness might be explained in terms of a recurrent neural network with its hub in the intralaminar nucleus of the thalamus and feedback connections to all parts of the cortex. He says his proposal is probably mistaken in the neurological details, but on the right track in its use of recurrent neural networks to account for consciousness. This is notably a reductionist rather than eliminativist account of consciousness.
What is the belief that everyday mental concepts such as beliefs, feelings, and desires are part of?
Along with his wife, Churchland is a major proponent of eliminative materialism, the belief which claims that everyday mental concepts such as beliefs, feelings, and desires are part of a " folk psychology " of theoretical constructs without coherent definition, destined to simply be obviated by a thoroughly scientific understanding of human nature.
Why can't we talk about understanding, conceiving, believing?
As we come to account for ourselves in this way, we will not even talk about understanding, conceiving, believing, because those is are mental states. We will have some neuroscientific way of describing what goes on in the brain when we account for the behavior of organisms such as ourselves.The Churchlands have done a great deal of work in actual brain science.
What is Gilbert Ryle's argument against the theory that the mind does not exist?
Took a quick look-see on the web. Gilbert Ryle’s argument against the theory that, the mind does not exist and therefore can't be the seat of self. Ryle believed that self comes from behavior. We're all just a bundle of behaviors caused by the physical workings of the body.
What is the self in Hume's view?
In this light, David Hume suggests that the self is just a bundle of perceptions, like links in a chain. To look for a unifying self beyond those perceptions is like looking for a chain apart from the links that constitute it. Hume argues that our concept of the self is a result of our natural habit of attributing unified existence to any collection of associated parts. This belief is natural, but there is no logical support for it.The concept of self is however a highly contested topic and in my opinion there are numerous unresolved problems in Hume’s philosophy of ‘the self’.
What is the innermost thing we learn?
Knowledge of our selves is primarily an innermost thing, but through our interaction with the external world we learn more about ourselves.
Is knowledge of ourselves inner or outer?
Knowledge of our selves is primarily an innermost thing, but through our interaction with the external world we learn more a
Who edited the Churchlands and their critics?
“Paul Churchland and Stated Space Semantics” and “Reply to Churchland.” In The Churchlands and Their Critics, edited by Robert N. McCauley. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1996. In both of these articles, the authors argue that Churchland’s state space version of a network account of semantics is wanting. They argue that Churchland has remained committed to two positions that are incompatible.
What is the strongest argument against the eliminative materialism that Churchland embraces?
This realism is important for Churchland, for it allows him to formulate a response to the argument from introspection, the strongest argument against the eliminative materialism that Churchland embraces. Churchland argues that, with suitable training and knowledge, one can eventually introspect one’s brain states directly. This claim undercuts the dualist position that one introspects one’s mental states that exist over and above the brain. However, this leads to one of the most controversial of Churchland’s theses, for he claims that eventually one can directly introspect such brain states as spiking frequencies in specific neural pathways and dopamine levels in the limbic system, based on a realist account of current and successful neurophysiological theories.
How does Churchland counter Searle's argument?
Churchland countered Searle’s argument with his own “luminous room” argument. Churchland asked the reader to imagine a small, closed-off room that is completely dark. The occupant of this room is the scientist James Clerk Maxwell, who claims that light is nothing other than electromagnetic waves. Maxwell shakes a bar magnet that produces such waves. An outside critic points out that the room is completely dark, so light cannot possibly be electromagnetic waves. Churchland says that all Maxwell needs to do is claim that the room is indeed lit, albeit at a grade too poor to be detected. All that is needed for visible light is that the electromagnetic waves be speeded up in order to produce visible light. The same is true for Searle’s argument, claims Churchland. All that is needed is that the syntax of a language be sufficiently complex in order for people to detect the meaning and thus the intentionality of symbol manipulation. Churchland’s argument, however, again suffers from problems arising from analogy. Scientists, for example, do not say there is light unless it is visible, even if moving electromagnetic waves are present. More important, it is not clear that speeded-up electromagnetic waves giving rise to visible light is analogous to increased syntactical complexity of language giving rise to meaning.
What is the theory of dualism?
Popular dualism, for example, holds that the mind is a spiritual substance yet fully possessed of spatial properties in intimate contact with the brain. Other dualistic theories claim that the mind is a property of the material brain. For example, epiphenomenalism holds that the mind is an emergent property of the brain that is not causal to other events, whereas interactionist property dualism holds that mental states emerge from the brain but can causally interact with the brain and other parts of the material body. A sophisticated form of dualism centers on the notion of supervenience. Things of kind A supervene on things of kind B when the presence or absence of things of kind A is completely determined by the presence or absence of things of kind B. It is sometimes argued that the mental supervenes on the physical but that mental categories are not identical with nor reducible to any physical categories.
Who wrote the moral network?
Flanagan, Owen. “The Moral Network.” In The Churchlands and Their Critics, edited by Robert N. McCauley. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1996. Flanagan defends Churchland’s moral network theory. He examines the potential of this theory for making sense of moral learning, knowledge, practices, and standards. He applauds the way the theory illuminates the biological, psychological, and social forces shaping the moral lives of human beings, while the normative component of the theory can assess right and wrong, good and bad.
Who is the proponent of eliminative materialism?
Article abstract: An analytic philosopher and proponent of eliminative materialism, Churchland maintained that advances in the neurosciences and artificial intelligence are the key to understanding cognition. A leading defender of scientific realism, he held that scientific theories present a literally true account of the world, especially of the unobservable world.
Overview
Paul Montgomery Churchland (born October 21, 1942) is a Canadian philosopher known for his studies in neurophilosophy and the philosophy of mind. After earning a Ph.D. from the University of Pittsburgh under Wilfrid Sellars (1969), Churchland rose to the rank of full professor at the University of Manitoba before accepting the Valtz Family Endowed Chair in Philosophy at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and a joint appointments in that institution's Institute f…
Early life and education
Paul Montgomery Churchland was born in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on October 21, 1942. Growing up in Vancouver, Churchland's father was a high school science teacher and his mother took in sewing. As a boy, he was obsessed with science fiction; he was particularly struck by the ideas in Robert A. Heinlein's Orphans of the Sky. Churchland liked building things in his father's woodworking and metal shop in their basement, and expected to become an aerodynam…
Career
Churchland lectured at the University of Toronto from 1967–69, and began his independent professional career as an instructor at the University of Pittsburgh in 1969. In 1969, Churchland took a position at the University of Manitoba, where he would teach for fifteen years: as an assistant professor (1969–74) and associate professor (1974–79), and then, from 1979–1984, as a full professor. He spent a year at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, and joined the fa…
Philosophical work
Churchland's work is in the school of analytic philosophy in western philosophy, with interests in epistemology and the philosophy of science, and specific principal interests in the philosophy of mind and in neurophilosophy and artificial intelligence. His work has been described as being influenced by the work of W. V. O. Quine, Thomas Kuhn, Russell Hanson, Wilfrid Sellars, and Paul Feyerabend.
Personal life
Churchland is the husband of philosopher Patricia Churchland, and it has been noted that, "Their work is so similar that they are sometimes discussed, in journals and books, as one person."
The Churchlands are the parents of two children, Mark Churchland and Anne Churchland, both of whom are neuroscientists.
Written works
• Churchland, Patricia Smith & Churchland, Paul (1990). "Could a Machine Think?". Scientific American. 262 (1, January): 32–7. Bibcode:1990SciAm.262a..32C. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0190-32. PMID 2294584. [Subtitle:] Classical AI is unlikely to yield conscious machines; systems that mimic the brain might.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
See also
• American philosophy
• List of American philosophers
• List of Canadian philosophers
Further reading
• Churchland, Paul M. (2014) [1995]. "Neural Networks and Common Sense". In Baumgartner, Peter; Payr, Sabine (eds.). Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists (interview). Princeton Legacy Library. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 33–46. ISBN 978-1400863969. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
• McCauley, Robert, ed. (1996). The Churchlands and their Critics. Philosophers and their Critics. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 97806311…