The Great Triumvirate was the name given to three powerful legislators, Henry Clay, Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster was an American statesman who represented New Hampshire and Massachusetts in the United States Congress and served as the United States Secretary of State under Presidents William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, and Millard Fillmore. He was also a prominent attorney, espe…
United States Capitol
The United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government. It is located on Capitol Hill at the eastern end of the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Though no longer at the geo…
War of 1812
The War of 1812 was a conflict fought between the United States and the United Kingdom, with their respective allies, from June 1812 to February 1815. Historians in Britain often see it as a minor theatre of the Napoleonic Wars; historians in the United States and Canada see it as a war in its o…
What happened to John Clay Calhoun and John Webster?
By 1852, Clay, Calhoun, and Webster had all passed away. They left a rich legacy behind them. Clay of the West, Calhoun of the South, and Webster of the North loved and served their country greatly. The generation that followed produced no leader that could unite the country without the force of arms.
Why did John C Calhoun object to Henry Clay's proposal?
Henry Clay had put forth a series of proposals for compromise between the slave and free states. His proposals were seen as favoring the North, and naturally John C. Calhoun objected. Calhoun was in failing health and sat in the Senate chamber, wrapped in a blanket as a stand-in read his speech for him.
What did Daniel Webster do after Calhoun's speech?
Daniel Webster spoke three days after Calhoun's speech. With the nation's fate in the balance, he pleaded with northerners to accept southern demands, for the sake of Union. Withdrawing his former support for the Wilmot Proviso, he hoped to persuade enough of his colleagues to move closer to Clay's proposals.
What did John C Calhoun represent in Congress?
John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, represented the interests of the South, and particularly the rights of southern slave owners. Calhoun, a South Carolina native who had been educated at Yale, was first elected to Congress in 1811.
See more
What was the role of Webster Clay and Calhoun?
Each man served, at various times, in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. And Clay, Webster, and Calhoun each served as secretary of state, which in the early years of the United States was generally regarded as a stepping stone to the presidency. Yet each man was thwarted in attempts to become president.
What were the Webster and Calhoun debates about?
Introduction The debates between Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and John C. Calhoun of South Carolina concerned the supremacy [highest power or authority of the federal government over state governments.
How did Calhoun and Webster differ?
Cal- houn and Daniel Webster debated the scope of federal government powers and whether states could nullify (veto) laws passed by a ma- jority in Congress. Calhoun champi- oned states' rights while Webster stood for a nation of one people based on majority rule.
Who were the members of the great triumvirate?
The so-called First Triumvirate of Pompey, Julius Caesar, and Marcus Licinius Crassus, which began in 60 bc, was not a formally created commission but an extralegal compact among three strong political leaders.
What did Webster argue?
In a speech considered among the greatest in U.S. political history, Webster eloquently defended the supremacy of the federal government over the states, arguing that nullification would end up tearing the country apart.
What is Calhoun known for?
A staunch defender of the institution of slavery, and a slave-owner himself, Calhoun was the Senate's most prominent states' rights advocate, and his doctrine of nullification professed that individual states had a right to reject federal policies that they deemed unconstitutional.
How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about the main purpose of the Constitution?
Webster believed that the Constitution was created to force both federal and state govermments to approve all laws, while Calhoun believed that it was created to give the U.S. Supreme Court the power to approve all laws.
How did Calhoun and Webster differ in who believed was responsible for the national crisis?
How did John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster differ in their interpretations of the power of the national government? Calhoun believed that the national government did not have the power to ban slavery, while Webster believed the government did have this power.
What did Daniel Webster believe in?
Webster viewed slavery as a matter of historical reality rather than moral principle. He argued that the issue of its existence in the territories had been settled long ago when Congress prohibited slavery in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and divided regions into slave and free in the 1820 Missouri Compromise.
What did Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun have in common?
In this cohort of statesmen, three near contemporaries— Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster—stood, by common consent, preeminent. For better or worse (some of each, in fact) their thought, oratory, and political preoccupations set the tone and agenda of the age. It was a self-consciously classical age.
Was Daniel Webster black?
His parents were Ebenezer, who worked as a tavern owner and a farmer and was also involved in politics, and his second wife, Abigail. While a child, Daniel earned the nickname "Black Dan" for his dark skin and black hair and eyes.
Did Webster support the American system?
The American System became the leading tenet of the Whig Party of Henry Clay and Daniel Webster. It was opposed by the Democratic Party of Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James K. Polk, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan prior to the Civil War, often on the grounds that the points of it were unconstitutional.
Why did Clay withdraw his support for the Wilmot Proviso?
Withdrawing his former support for the Wilmot Proviso, he hoped to persuade enough of his colleagues to move closer to Clay's proposals. Although there was no immediate deal, his words echoed in the minds of the Congressmen as they debated into that hot summer. By 1852, Clay, Calhoun, and Webster had all passed away.
When did Clay save the day?
When South Carolina nullified the tariff in 1832, Clay saved the day with the Compromise Tariff of 1833. After 30 years in Congress and three unsuccessful attempts at the Presidency, Clay wanted badly to make good with yet another nation-saving deal.
What was Daniel Webster's speech?
Dartmouth College. Daniel Webster's "Seventh of March" speech urged Senators from all regions of the nation to compromise their positions in order to save the Union. Henry Clay of Kentucky, John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts dominated national politics from the end of the War of 1812 until their deaths in ...
What was Calhoun's law practice?
After the Fourteenth Congress, Calhoun became Secretary of War and Webster declined reelection to focus on his law practice in Boston, a practice which took him before the Supreme Court in landmark cases like Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden and McCullouch v.
Who were the leaders of the compromise of 1850?
The debates leading to the Compromise of 1850 were the last great hurrah for the triad as they saw at the same time the emergence of a new generation of political leaders like Jefferson Davis, William H. Seward and Stephen A. Douglas .
Who were the three statesmen in the Great Triumvirate?
politics, the Great Triumvirate (known also as the Immortal Trio) refers to a triumvirate of three statesmen who dominated American politics for much of the first half of the 19th century, namely Henry Clay of Kentucky, Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and John C. Calhoun of South Carolina . These men's interactions in large part tell ...
Who was the leader of the anti-war movement?
Webster was elected in 1813 to Congress and immediately became a leading anti-war and anti-administration Federalist. Webster wrangled with the nationalists Clay and Calhoun on post-war issues such as the chartering of the Second Bank of the United States and the Tariff of 1816.
Who were the three senators in the Second Party?
John C. Calhoun. Henry Clay. Daniel Webster. The three Senators and statesmen (arranged here alphabetically) dominated American politics during the Second Party System (1828–52), from the start of the John Quincy Adams administration through the Compromise of 1850. In U.S. politics, the Great Triumvirate (known also as the Immortal Trio) ...
Who was the oldest person to serve in the Senate?
Clay , the oldest, emerged on the national political scene first, serving as counsel for Aaron Burr in his treason trial and serving two short stints in the Senate before being elected Speaker of the House of Representatives for the Twelfth Congress.
When did the three senators reunite?
Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden and McCullouch v. Maryland in which he represented the Bank of the United States. The three were reunited in the Senate in 1832, with Calhoun's resignation from the vice presidency and election to the Senate in the midst of the Nullification Crisis.
What was Jackson's animosity towards Calhoun?
Jackson's personal animosity for Calhoun seems to have had its origin in the Washington "social scene" of the time. Jackson's feelings were inflamed by the Mrs. Calhoun's treatment of Peggy, wife of Jackson's Secretary of War, John Eaton. Mrs.
What did Andrew Jackson think of Henry Clay?
Andrew Jackson viewed Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, as opportunistic, ambitious, and untrustworthy. Henry Clay was viewed by Jackson as politically untrustworthy, an opportunistic, ambitious and self-aggrandizing man. He believed that Clay would compromise the essentials of American republican democracy to advance his own self-serving ...
What was Clay's vision?
Clay was called The Great Compromiser, and served in the Congress starting in 1806. He had a grand strategic vision called the American System. This was a federal government initiative to foster national growth though protective tariffs, internal improvements and the Bank of the United States.
