why is mutually assured destruction important

Full Answer

What is mutually assured destruction?

Updated June 20, 2019 Mutually Assured Destruction, or mutually assured deterrence (MAD), is a military theory that was developed to deter the use of nuclear weapons. The theory is based on the fact that nuclear weaponry is so devastating that no government wants to use them.

How was mutually assured destruction seen during the Cold War?

How Mutually Assured Destruction was Seen During the Cold War As the United States continued to build and place their nuclear weapons during the Cold War, it became clear to United States officials that there was no defense against a nuclear attack from the Soviet Union. This led to the dismantling of defense systems, both civil and antiballistic.

Is the MAD policy effective as a deterrent?

Edward Teller, a member of the Manhattan Project, echoed these concerns as early as 1985 when he said that “The MAD policy as a deterrent is totally ineffective if it becomes known that in case of attack, we would not retaliate against the aggressor.”

What is the JSTOR number for Mutually Assured Destruction?

JSTOR 42761440. ^ "Time to re-assess mutually assured destruction". BMJ: British Medical Journal. 359. 2017. ISSN 0959-8138. JSTOR 26951722. ^ National Archives and Records Administration, RG 200, Defense Programs and Operations, LeMay's Memo to President and JCS Views, Box 83.

What was the impact of mutually assured destruction?

The Doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction states that the impact of nuclear warfare is so devastating that it deters any country from using nuclear weapons. The use of atomic weapons will lead to the destruction of both the attacker and the defender.

Is mutually assured destruction still relevant?

It is still in operation today between the nuclear forces of the U.S. and Russia, and experts have suggested that MAD is the reason that small states such as Israel are thought to have developed nuclear missiles.

When was mutually assured destruction used?

In 1962, the concept of mutually assured destruction started to play a major part in the defence policy of the US. President Kennedy's Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, set out in a speech to the American Bar Foundation a theory of flexible nuclear response. In essence it meant stockpiling a huge nuclear arsenal.

Does mutually assured destruction prevent war?

The payoff of the MAD doctrine was and still is expected to be a tense but stable global peace. However, many have argued that mutually assured destruction is unable to deter conventional war that could later escalate.

How did the concept of mutually assured destruction influence the Cold War?

The hydrogen bomb was more destructive than the atomic bomb. How did the concept of mutually assured destruction influence the Cold War? It reminded people that a nuclear war would be devastating for everyone.

Is SDI still around?

SDI officially ended in 1993, when the Clinton Administration redirected the efforts towards theatre ballistic missiles and renamed the agency the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO).

Why was the Cuban Missile Crisis a significant event in the Cold War?

U.S. Jupiter missiles were removed from Turkey in April 1963. The Cuban missile crisis stands as a singular event during the Cold War and strengthened Kennedy's image domestically and internationally. It also may have helped mitigate negative world opinion regarding the failed Bay of Pigs invasion.

How do you use mutually assured destruction in a sentence?

And, in the final act of this tragedy, both sides lost - mutually assured destruction. Nuclear deterrence depended on mutually assured destruction. Dictators threaten mutually assured destruction if they fear they will not get their way. This was the economic equivalent of mutually assured destruction.

Is SDI still around?

SDI officially ended in 1993, when the Clinton Administration redirected the efforts towards theatre ballistic missiles and renamed the agency the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO).

How many nations currently have access to nuclear weapons?

Nuclear weapons are still here—and they're still an existential risk. Nine countries possess nuclear weapons: the United States, Russia, France, China, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea. In total, the global nuclear stockpile is close to 13,000 weapons.

How many nukes would it take to destroy the world?

The declassified study from the scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory, published in 1947 had first shed light on the question that how many nuclear bombs it would take to destroy the world. According to the study, it would take about ten to a hundred 'super nukes' to end humanity, a publication reported.

Why were nuclear weapons not used in the Cold War?

Nuclear weapons were never used during the Cold War because national leaders, even in situations like the Cuban Missile Crisis, judged that there was never any clear advantage in launching a nuclear strike. The risks never outweighed the perceived benefits, as a nuclear attack would clearly lead to nuclear retaliation.

What is mutually assured destruction?

Mutually Assured Destruction is based on fear and cynicism and is one of the most brutally and horribly pragmatic ideas ever put into practice. At one point, the world really did stand opposed to each other with the power to wipe both sides out in a day. Amazingly, this probably did stop a greater war from taking place.

Why was mad preferred in the Cold War?

Both sides of the debate, including the pros and the anti-MAD, worried it might actually tempt some leaders to act. MAD was preferred because if successful, it did stop the massive death toll. Another alternative was to develop such an effective first strike capability that your enemy couldn’t destroy you when they fired back. At times during the Cold War, MAD proponents feared this ability had been achieved.

What is the meaning of MAD in military?

Robert Wilde. Updated June 20, 2019. Mutually Assured Destruction, or mutually assured deterrence (MAD), is a military theory that was developed to deter the use of nuclear weapons. The theory is based on the fact that nuclear weaponry is so devastating that no government wants to use them. Neither side will attack the other with their nuclear ...

Why did the Cold War have a lack of missile defenses?

For long periods of the Cold War, MAD entailed a relative lack of missile defenses so as to guarantee mutual destruction. Anti-ballistic missile systems were closely examined by the other side to see if they changed the situation. Things changed when Ronald Reagan became president of the U.S.

Why did the US use nuclear weapons?

At first, the US air force military wanted to continue to use nuclear weapons to counter additional threats from communist China. But although the two world wars were filled with technological advances that were used without restraint, after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear weapons came to be both unused and unusable.

When was the mad strategy developed?

The MAD strategy was developed during the Cold War, when the U.S., USSR, and respective allies held nuclear weapons of such number and strength that they were capable of destroying the other side completely and threatened to do so if attacked.

Who is the man behind the mad?

The name and acronym of MAD come from physicist and polymath John von Neumann, a key member of the Atomic Energy Commission and a man who helped the US develop nuclear devices. A game theorist, von Neumann is credited with developing the equilibrium strategy and named it as he saw fit.

What is the doctrine of mutual assured destruction?

Mutually assured destruction ( MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two or more opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender (see pre-emptive nuclear strike and second strike ).

How was mutually assured destruction seen during the Cold War?

How Mutually Assured Destruction was Seen During the Cold War. As the United States continued to build and place their nuclear weapons during the Cold War, it became clear to United States officials that there was no defense against a nuclear attack from the Soviet Union.

What was the Cuban missile crisis?

By the time of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, both the United States and the Soviet Union had developed the capability of launching a nuclear-tipped missile from a submerged submarine , which completed the "third leg" of the nuclear triad weapons strategy necessary to fully implement the MAD doctrine.

What would happen if one side constructed a similar shelter system?

If one side constructed a similar system of shelters, it would violate the MAD doctrine and destabilize the situation, because it would have less to fear from a second strike. The same principle is invoked against missile defense .

What was the original goal of the MAD doctrine?

This modified version of MAD was seen as a winnable nuclear war, while still maintaining the possibility of assured destruction for at least one party. This policy was further developed by the Reagan administration with the announcement of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI, nicknamed "Star Wars"), the goal of which was to develop space-based technology to destroy Soviet missiles before they reached the United States.

What did theorists think about nuclear warfare?

When nuclear warfare between the United States and Soviet Union started to become a reality, theorists began to think that mutual assured destruction would be sufficient to deter the other side from launching a nuclear weapon.

What would happen if either side attacked?

Either side, if attacked for any reason by the other, would retaliate with equal or greater force. The expected result is an immediate, irreversible escalation of hostilities resulting in both combatants' mutual, total, and assured destruction. The doctrine requires that neither side construct shelters on a massive scale.

What is mutually assured destruction?

It is a military strategy used in wars or combat where if either side makes an attack, the destruction of both sides is ensured. As a result, in this situation, a stalemate arises. Peace is ensured through a guarantee that each side has the ability to destroy the other and will do so if necessary.

What is nuclear deterrence?

Nuclear Deterrence: A military strategy that uses the threat of retaliation to dissuade a nation from a particular kind of attack. When it comes to nuclear bombs, deterrence is achieved by the promise of a nation responding to a nuclear bomb attack with their own nuclear bomb attack. 3

Why is the fear of retaliation a method of peacekeeping?

The fear of retaliation inhibits action. Reverting to the childlike tendency of ‘I won’t if you won’t’ , the development of mutually assured destruction as a result of nuclear bombs is actually a method of peacekeeping. 1 It is a rational response to the knowledge that acting would lead to one’s own destruction.

How is peace guaranteed?

Peace is ensured through a guarantee that each side has the ability to destroy the other and will do so if necessary. Although mainly a term used in military strategy and jargon, the foundations of mutually assured destruction, competition, and trust are also relevant to aspects of our relationships with others today. 1.

When mad doesn't work?

When MAD Doesn’t Work: Mutually Assured Distrust. Mutually assured destruction only achieves peace when the bearers of the arms have an equal amount of power. A nation will only stop themselves from attacking another nation if they believe the attack will result in their own destruction as well.

What would happen if one country dropped a nuclear bomb?

If one country dropped a nuclear bomb, others would retaliate, and before long, all of humanity would perish. 1 This is where nuclear deterrence was developed – since both the Soviet Union and the U.S. had nuclear bombs, they dissuaded one another from using them with the threat of retaliation.

What would happen if multiple nations had nuclear bombs?

Since multiple nations have nuclear bombs they could deploy, any one country deploying them would result in the destruction of nations and a majority of humanity. Knowing that worldwide, humanity would suffer from the deployment of a nuclear bomb forces each nation with nuclear bombs into a stalemate.

Which difficulty may rob mutually assured destruction of its deterrent efficacy?

A third difficulty which may rob mutually assured destruction of its deterrent efficacy has to do, not with ensuring that the attack can be foreseen in order to allow reciprocation, but instead with the possibility that a group may find even total destruction to be an acceptable loss.

What is the assurance of immediate, assured, and severe reciprocation?

The assurance of immediate, assured, and severe reciprocation has a certain strong intuitive ethical appeal, for where violence cannot be prevented, it is thereby at least assured that one reaps what one sows. For a number of different reasons, mutually assured destruction is becoming increasingly difficult to guarantee.

Can an organization with no such responsibility wield a weapon of mass destruction?

If an organization with no such responsibility, a group perhaps formed only in order to destroy, should be able to wield a weapon of mass destruction, it need not find mutually assured destruction as a deterrent consequence.

Will weapons of mass destruction increase in number?

As the varieties of weapons of mass destruction increase in number, and as our abilities to produce and employ them become ever more widespread, ever smaller groups with ever fewer resources will be able to produce and employ such weapons.

Can you assure mutual destruction?

First, it is important to note that one can only assure mutual destruction in the case that either one can determine that a weapon of mass destruction has been launched prior to its effect or one can ensure that one’s offensive capability will survive a weapon of mass destruction.

Who was the founder of the nuclear disarmament movement?

During the late 1950s, Bertrand Russell was a founder of the large and influential movement called the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) in Britain, and one of the most vocal opponents of the Cold War nuclear buildup. He asked, during a famous ban-the-bomb talk on the BBC, whether we were “so destitute of wisdom, so incapable of impartial love, so blind even to the simplest dictates of self-preservation,” that we would carry out “the extermination of all life on our planet.” Many philosophers joined him in his views in those days, when there was a real possibility of an unspeakably horrible nuclear holocaust.

Is mutually assured destruction possible?

As we consider mutually assured destruction anew, we may be surprised to note how much the world has changed since the end of the Cold War, and it seems possible that we may even view mutually assured destruction with a kind of nostalgia. Mutually assured destruction is possible only in a very particular political situation that is becoming increasingly impossible: all parties must be identified and monitored, means of mass destruction must be anticipated, and destruction must be a similarly unacceptable loss to all parties. In the absence of any of these conditions mutually assured destruction is not possible, and we find ourselves now in a situation wherein each of these conditions has recently been made uncertain. This offers us an unusual opportunity to gain a new understanding of the logic of mutually assured destruction, its intuitive ethical appeal, and the ephemeral nature of its deterrent efficacy.

Growing Realization

Developing A Mad Strategy

Based on Fear and Cynicism

The End of Mad

• For long periods of the Cold War, MAD entailed a relative lack of missile defenses so as to guarantee mutual destruction. Anti-ballistic missile systems were closely examined by the other side to see if they changed the situation. Things changed when Ronald Reaganbecame president of the U.S. He decided the U.S. should attempt to build a missile def...

See more on thoughtco.com

Sources