Full Answer
What were the advantages and disadvantages of the fur trade?
May 07, 2020 · Why was the fur trade so important? The fur trade began in the 1500's as an exchange between Indians and Europeans. The Indians traded furs for such goods as tools and weapons. Beaver fur, which was used in Europe to make felt hats, became the most valuable of these furs. The Indians, in turn, gave pelts to the French. Click to see full answer.
What were the negative effects of the fur trade?
Oct 26, 2020 · Why was the fur trade important to the First Nations? They built trading posts where Aboriginal Peoples could bring their furs. When the fur trade began, it fit well into Aboriginal ways of life. The Aboriginal Peoples had always hunted and traded for …
What did people use fur for in the fur trade?
France and England were bitter enemies at this time. Indeed, one of the principal goals of the French fur trade during the 1700s was to maintain strong ties and military alliances with the Indians. Between 1698 and 1763, France and England fought a …
What made the fur trade successful?
The fur trade had a tremendous effect on Dakota and Ojibwe cultural practices and influenced US-Native economic and political relations in the 19th century, including treaty negotiations. Voyageurs ("travelers" in French) were men hired to work for the fur trade companies to transport trade goods throughout the vast territory to rendezvous posts.
Why was the fur trade important to the First Nations?
The fur trade provided Indigenous peoples with European goods that they could use for gift-giving ceremonies, to improve their social status and to go to war. The French forged military alliances with their Indigenous allies in order to maintain good trade and social relations.Jul 23, 2013
Why was the fur trade important quizlet?
Why was the fur trade important? Europeans provided capital, organization, manufactured goods, and equipment for the trade. Indians provided much of the labor force, they hunted the animals, guided the fur traders, etc.
What were the two cultural legacies of the fur trade?
These two very different cultural legacies collided on the western frontier. Yet each accepted innovations from the other which suited their needs. The traders adopted American Indian foods, clothing, language, and geographic knowledge.
What is fur trade Apush?
Fur Trade. French were heavily involved in the fur trade (mostly beaver) for the export back to Europe. Traded metal items with Indian trappers for beaver pelts. 4. Huron Indian tribe.
Reader view
That is the end of my presentation on the fur trade and why the fur trade was significant. The reason why this era of trade was important was because of the demand of the beaver pelts. everyone wanted a beaver fur hat. But once the trend died, nobody wanted one. Beaver hats were phased out. So. I hope you enjoyed this presentation. Thank you!
Where did the Fur Trade occur?
The Fur Trade started when the Europeans (British and French) were trading with the First Nations and realized that the furs that were needed in France and Britain were here in Canada. Beaver pelt hats had a huge demand at the time and that is why the Europeans wanted these furs.
What was the fur trade?
The fur trade was based on pelts destined either for the luxury clothing market or for the felting industries, of which hatting was the most important. This was a transatlantic trade. The animals were trapped and exchanged for goods in North America, and the pelts were transported to Europe for processing and final sale.
Where did the fur trade originate?
Introduction. A commercial fur trade in North America grew out of the early contact between Indians and European fisherman who were netting cod on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland and on the Bay of Gaspé near Quebec. Indians would trade the pelts of small animals, such as mink, for knives and other iron-based products, or for textiles.
How did beaver skins turn into hats?
The transformation of beaver skins into felt and then hats was a highly skilled activity. The process required first that the beaver wool be separated from the guard hairs and the skin, and that some of the wool have open barbs, since felt required some open-barbed wool in the mixture.
How many beaver hats were exported in 1770?
In total, over the seventy years to 1770, 21 million beaver and felt hats were exported from England. In addition to the final product, England exported the raw material, beaver pelts. In 1760, £15,000 in beaver pelts were exported along with a range of other furs.
What did Indians trade?
Indians would trade the pelts of small animals, such as mink, for knives and other iron-based products, or for textiles. Exchange at first was haphazard and it was only in the late sixteenth century, when the wearing of beaver hats became fashionable, that firms were established who dealt exclusively in furs.
When did fur return to Fort Albany?
From 1700 there is an uninterrupted annual series of fur returns at Fort Albany; the fur returns from York Factory begin in 1716 (see Figure 1). The beaver returns at Fort Albany and York Factory for the period 1700 to 1770 are described in Figure 2.
What is staple fur?
Staple furs are sought for their wool. All staple furs have a double coating of hair with long, stiff, smooth hairs called guard hairs which protect the shorter, softer hair, called wool, that grows next to the animal skin. Only the wool can be felted.
When was the fur trade?
November 1, 2019. The fur trade was a vast commercial enterprise across the wild, forested expanse of what is now Canada. It was at its peak for nearly 250 years, from the early 17th to the mid-19th centuries. It was sustained primarily by the trapping of beavers to satisfy the European demand for felt hats.
Where did the fur trade begin?
The fur trade began as an adjunct to the fishing industry. Early in the 16th century, fishermen from northwest Europe were taking rich catches of cod on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Drying their fish onshore took several weeks. During that time, good relations had to be maintained with Indigenous people, who were eager to obtain metal and cloth goods from the Europeans. What they had to offer in exchange were furs and fresh meat. The fishermen found an eager and profitable market in Europe for the furs.
What was the fur trade in 1715?
As an item on the balance sheet of French external trade, furs were minuscule. Their share was also shrinking proportionately as trade in tropical produce and manufactured goods increased. However, the fur trade was the backbone of the Canadian economy.
What was the impact of the Oregon Treaty of 1846 on the American colony?
As a result of the Oregon Treaty of 1846, the HBC retreated north of the 49th parallel of latitude. To the east, at the Red River colony, the HBC met the challenge of free traders by charging Pierre-Guillaume Sayer and three other Métis in 1849 with violation of the HBC monopoly. ( See also: Sayer Trial .) Although the company won a legal victory in the courtroom, the community believed that the free traders had been exonerated. In Lower Canada, the company acquired the lease for the King’s Posts in 1832. However, the northward march of lumbermen signalled the lessening importance of the fur trade in this region. Simpson countered brilliantly by making his company an important supplier of goods needed by the lumber crews.
What were the two major systems of fur trade?
At the time of the conquest of New France, over the period 1759–60, two systems dominated the commercial fur trade of the northern half of the continent: the St. Lawrence - Great Lakes system, based in Montreal and extending to the upper reaches of the Mississippi River and its major northern tributaries, as well as to the prairies and the southern portion of the Canadian Shield; and the Rupert’s Land system, which covered the whole region draining into Hudson Bay and James Bay.
How long did the fur trade last?
The fur trade was a vast commercial enterprise across the wild, forested expanse of what is now Canada. It was at its peak for nearly 250 years, from the early 17th to the mid-19th centuries. It was sustained primarily by the trapping of beavers to satisfy the European demand for felt hats.
What were the advantages of the French Canadian trade?
They had many advantages: they controlled the main waterways throughout the West; they had a sure supply of the birch bark needed for canoes (something the Anglo-Americans and the HBC men both lacked); many of their trade goods were preferred by the Indigenous people; and they had good relations with the First Nations, with whom they had developed extensive kinship ties. Attempts by the English of the Thirteen American Colonies to obtain more land for settlement angered the Indigenous people. The French did not covet Indigenous lands but were determined to deny them to the English.
Why was the Fur Trade important to New France
For a long period of time the fur trade was very important to New France. They sold items like boots, coats, clothes, furniture and many more. Some of the items sold in New France weren't very useful or important for them so they sold them to other countries that would find them more valuable.
why was New France losing profit
At first the fur trade was very popular and gained large profits. The fur was very light witch made super easy to transport. In the 1690's, beaver pelt in Europe was in high demand, because French crown guaranteed the price of the fur, the fur trade actually lost money.
What is New France
As the French tried to explore new trading routes to Asia, they traveled west hoping to reach Asia. When they reached land they thought they were in Asia. They encountered the First Nations. The first French settlement were fishing villages along the coast, but soon fur became more valuable then fish so instead of fishing the French hunted for fur.
Who were New France's rivals
The French often lost money, but the French did not want to lose the fur trade to their enemy's, the English. The French had a lot less land then the English. The french created a relationship with the Native Americans. This alliance gave the French an advantage over the English.
