See more
What caused the Boston Massacre What else could it have been called?
The cause of the Boston Massacre had to do with taxation without representation. In addition to this, British troops had been sent to Boston to enforce tax laws and the colonists resented the British troops.
Could the revolution have been avoided?
Given the political realities of the day, war appears to have been virtually inevitable. Even so, independence very likely would have been prevented had Britain had an adequate number of troops in America in April 1775 or a capable general to lead the campaign for New York in 1776, someone like Earl Cornwallis.
Who is to blame for the Boston Massacre?
Patriots argued the event was the massacre of civilians perpetrated by the British Army, while loyalists argued that it was an unfortunate accident, the result of self-defense of the British soldiers from a threatening and dangerous mob.
Why is the Boston Massacre important?
The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists' desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.
Was the revolution inevitable or could it have been avoided?
The actions of British and colonial leaders made the American Revolution unavoidable. The actions of people on both sides sank efforts to fix British and American colonial relations, but the conflict could have been avoided if some had acted differently.
Why was the Revolutionary War not avoidable?
The Revolutionary War was avoidable because England could have not upset the colonists, and could have been fair to them, and the colonists could have not rebelled against the British. There is multiple ways either of these could have happened, such as England could have not taxed the colonists so unfairly.
What was the argument about that started the Boston Massacre?
The protesters, who called themselves Patriots, were protesting the occupation of their city by British troops, who were sent to Boston in 1768 to enforce unpopular taxation measures passed by a British parliament that lacked American representation.
What 3 events led to the Boston Massacre?
A series of global events led to a local tragedy for Boston in 1770. Bostonians reacted to Parliament's Stamp Act of 1765 and Townshend Acts of 1767 with anger, and sometimes with violence. After the Stamp Act was enacted, Bostonians rioted, destroyed property and intimidated appointed tax collectors.
What do the British call the Boston Massacre?
The event occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. Five people died and six were injured. The event was called the “Bloody Massacre” by the colonists, and “An Unhappy Disturbance” by the British.
What can we learn from the Boston Massacre?
The killings in Boston, Pelham reminds us, were entirely predictable—the natural consequences, or fruits, of a government exercising uncontrolled power over its people. The Boston Massacre still has much to teach us. It revealed how far the British might go to impose their will.
Was anything that could have prevented the American Revolution from occurring?
The American Revolution could have been avoided if the British did not keep such a tight hold on the colonists, gave them representation in parliament, and gave them the birthrights they desperately wanted. …
Could Louis XVI prevent the revolution?
He came really quite close to preventing the French Revolution. In 1789 he called the Estates-General, France's representative body, to discuss new taxes that would be higher on the nobles and clergy, hopefully fixing France's economic crisis.
What are 3 reasons for the revolution?
Here are 6 key causes of the American revolution.Seven Years War (1756-1763) ... Taxes and Duties. ... Boston Massacre (1770) ... Boston Tea Party (1773) ... Intolerable Acts (1774) ... King George III's Speech to Parliament (1775)
What ways was revolution not revolutionary?
However, resulting in a war from a dispute did not bring satisfaction to anybody. Instead, The Revolutionary War was “not revolutionary” because it did not significantly change the lives of British citizens, African Americans or women during and after the war.