...
| Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald | |
|---|---|
| Budget | $200 million |
| Box office | $654.9 million |
How much did 'Fantastic Beasts 3' cost to make?
Fantastic Beasts 3 commands one of the largest film production costs of 2020 and is Warner Bros. Picture's most expensive project of the year, coming in at approximately $200 million - the same budget for the previous two movies.
Is fantastic beasts 2 Harry Potter's first misstep?
Fantastic Beasts 2 Is Harry Potter's First Box Office Misfire. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald turned a profit at the box office, but it is arguably the first misstep in the franchise. By Chris Agar Dec 06, 2018. Share.
Will Fantastic Beasts 2 be rotten on Rotten Tomatoes?
Movies have been able to overcome negative buzz before, but the second Fantastic Beasts was not one of them. When the professional reviews started to roll in, Crimes of Grindelwald became the franchise's first installment to be Rotten on Rotten Tomatoes.
Is fantastic beasts like the Star Wars prequels?
This is where the Fantastic Beasts movies really start to feel like the Star Wars prequels. But if we're going to try to make sense of it, we have to get into the Dumbledore family history. Albus's parents were Percival and Kendra Dumbledore. The Harry Potter books establish a pretty clear timeline for their tragic story.
How much did Fantastic Beasts make?
How much did The Crimes of Grindelwald make?
Is Fantastic Beasts a spinoff?
Is the second Fantastic Beasts rotten?
About this website
How much did Fantastic Beasts 2 make?
200 million USDFantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald / Budget
How much did fantastic beasts 3 cost?
200 million USDFantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore / BudgetImage via Warner Bros. The studio was also hoping to keep the film's costs in check, but with a hefty payout for the departing Depp and a budget that ballooned to a reported $200 million because of the pandemic, Fantastic Beasts 3 needed to do way better to be counted as a hit.
How much did Fantastic Beasts 2 make opening weekend?
Monday's Weekend Actuals: April 15-17, 2022TitleWeekend ActualLocationsFantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore$42,151,2564,208Sonic the Hedgehog 2$29,304,3954,258The Lost City$6,222,7773,430Everything Everywhere All At Once$6,187,1182,22031 more rows•Apr 17, 2022
How much did Johnny Depp make for fantastic beasts 3?
For his role as the villain in J.K. Rowling's “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald”, Depp was paid $13.5 million.
Is Fantastic Beasts 4 Cancelled?
Fantastic Beasts 4 has yet to be officially confirmed by Warner Bros, although the series was always planned to be a five-movie series. Of course, that was before all the behind-the-scenes issues such as the recasting of Johnny Depp and the backlash against Rowling's tweets about gender.
Is Fantastic Beasts 2 flop?
But the follow-up, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, was summarily panned by critics (36 per cent on Rotten Tomatoes) and was also a box office failure ($654.85 million).
Does J.K. Rowling make money from Fantastic Beasts 3?
"Fantastics Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore" is the first movie in the Harry Potter-verse in four years, and it's once again raising questions about how much recent Harry Potter content its creator, J.K. Rowling, profits from.
Did secrets of Dumbledore make money?
A decade ago, it would have been hard to believe that a future Harry Potter spin-off would go bleak! However, that is today's reality. WB's Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets Of Dumbledore has finally managed to earn a global box-office of $400.5 million.
How much did Dumbledore secrets make?
405.2 million USDFantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore / Box office
Will Johnny Depp return to Fantastic 4?
After Johnny Depp lost his libel case against the UK tabloid The Sun, which had called him a 'wife-beater', Warner Bros removed him from the role of Gellert Grindelwald, the primary antagonist of the 'Fantastic Beasts' franchise.
Who is the highest paid actor?
Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson followed with 50 million dollars after Amazon Studios acquired the rights for his upcoming film "Red One."...Best-paid actors worldwide as of August 2021, by income (in million U.S. dollars)CharacteristicAnnual income in million U.S. dollarsDaniel Craig1007 more rows
Did Johnny Depp lose the role of Grindelwald?
Warner Bros. confirmed Depp's withdrawal with a brief statement, thanking Depp “for his work on the films” and confirming “the role of Gellert Grindelwald will be recast.” While a source close to the production says Rowling signed off on Warner Bros.
Does J.K. Rowling make money from Fantastic Beasts 3?
"Fantastics Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore" is the first movie in the Harry Potter-verse in four years, and it's once again raising questions about how much recent Harry Potter content its creator, J.K. Rowling, profits from.
Was Fantastic Beasts 3 a success?
It earned $71 million last weekend after a $56 million opening weekend, giving it a $150 million overseas cume and $193 million global cume. That's a 22/78 domestic/overseas split, which isn't far off from Crimes of Grindelwald (24/76) and Where to Find Them (29/71).
Will Johnny Depp be in Fantastic Beasts 4?
After Johnny Depp lost his libel case against the UK tabloid The Sun, which had called him a 'wife-beater', Warner Bros removed him from the role of Gellert Grindelwald, the primary antagonist of the 'Fantastic Beasts' franchise.
How did Fantastic Beasts 3 do without Johnny Depp?
He's an amazing actor, however, Fantastic Beasts 3 achieved a new and terrible record without the Depp man. The new film had a meager $43 million opening, leaving it as the worst in the entire Harry Potter franchise.
How much did Fantastic Beasts make?
stumbled across a goldmine when they acquired the film rights to J.K. Rowling's ultra-popular Harry Potter novels and brought the magical universe to the big screen. It proved to be a very wise investment, as the eight movies collectively earned $7.7 billion at the worldwide box office (an average of $965. 4 million a pop) and were all well-received by critics. Sadly (for fans and studio executives), Harry's story came to an end with 2011's The Deathly Hallows - Part 2.
How much did The Crimes of Grindelwald make?
Earning just $62.1 million domestically in its first three days, The Crimes of Grindelwald scored the lowest debut in the series by more than $12 million.
Is Fantastic Beasts a spinoff?
However, the property made its return five years later with the first Fantastic Beasts installment. A spinoff/prequel centering on the adventures of Newt Scamander, the film proved to be another hit for the studio. Though reviews weren't as positively glowing as the mainline Potter movies, it still generated solid word-of-mouth and brought in $814 million worldwide. This all but ensured Rowling's plan to craft a five-part narrative would unfold, and The Crimes of Grindelwald hit theaters last month. Unfortunately, the results were far from what WB was hoping for.
Is the second Fantastic Beasts rotten?
Movies have been able to overcome negative buzz before, but the second Fantastic Beasts was not one of them. When the professional reviews started to roll in, Crimes of Grindelwald became the franchise's first installment to be Rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. To illustrate just how much of a step down in quality it is, ...
What does Newt do at the end of Fantastic Beasts?
At the end of Fantastic Beasts, Newt obliviates the no-majs of New York City by using a special compound derived from the venom of the Swooping Evil, which removes bad memories.
How did Newt obliviate the No Majs?
At the end of Fantastic Beasts, Newt obliviates the no-majs of New York City by using a special compound derived from the venom of the Swooping Evil, which removes bad memories. However, the ending also hinted that Jacob remembered some of his adventures with Newt and the magical creatures, as well as his budding relationship with Queenie. The Crimes of Grindelwald confirms that although Jacob was obliviated with the other no-majs, he kept most of his memories because they weren't bad memories. In the time since Fantastic Beasts concluded, Jacob and Queenie have been dating, which caused a rift between Queenie and Tina.
Why doesn't Jacob want to marry Queenie?
He lifts the enchantment and we learn that Jacob doesn't want to marry Queenie because it would put her in danger of being sent to prison since relationships between witches and no-majs are illegal in the United States wizarding community. Jacob and Queenie fight about marriage (and it's clear this is a fight they've had many times), and it ends with Queenie leaving for Paris to find Tina and Jacob going after her with Newt in an effort to get her back. However, this throughline becomes key to a decision Queenie makes later in the movie.
What is the blood pact between Dumbledore and Grindelwald?
The blood pact between Dumbledore and Grindelwald is a physical, magic McGuffin that Grindelwald has had in his possession all along. It's the reason why Dumbledore insists several times in this movie that he can't be the one to confront Grindelwald. As teenagers, the two were close--"closer than brothers," and in fact, they were most likely romantically entangled. Thus, they made a blood pact that apparently prevents Dumbledore from fighting Grindelwald.
Is the ending of Fantastic Beasts 2 a doozy?
The ending of Fantastic Beasts 2: The Crimes of Grindelwald was a doozy. At least one prominent character introduced in this sequel was unceremoniously killed, and even more importantly, that twist probably left your jaw on the floor. That's partially because it was so unexpected, and partially because it doesn't seem to make a shred of sense.
Is Fantastic Beasts like Star Wars?
Some of these questions may be answered in the movie, but it's impossible to be sure after just one viewing, thanks to the film's convoluted story, confusing structure, huge cast of poorly developed new characters, and last minute info dump where all this is revealed so quickly it's hard to keep track. This is where the Fantastic Beasts movies really start to feel like the Star Wars prequels. But if we're going to try to make sense of it, we have to get into the Dumbledore family history.
How much did Fantastic Beasts make?
stumbled across a goldmine when they acquired the film rights to J.K. Rowling's ultra-popular Harry Potter novels and brought the magical universe to the big screen. It proved to be a very wise investment, as the eight movies collectively earned $7.7 billion at the worldwide box office (an average of $965. 4 million a pop) and were all well-received by critics. Sadly (for fans and studio executives), Harry's story came to an end with 2011's The Deathly Hallows - Part 2.
How much did The Crimes of Grindelwald make?
Earning just $62.1 million domestically in its first three days, The Crimes of Grindelwald scored the lowest debut in the series by more than $12 million.
Is Fantastic Beasts a spinoff?
However, the property made its return five years later with the first Fantastic Beasts installment. A spinoff/prequel centering on the adventures of Newt Scamander, the film proved to be another hit for the studio. Though reviews weren't as positively glowing as the mainline Potter movies, it still generated solid word-of-mouth and brought in $814 million worldwide. This all but ensured Rowling's plan to craft a five-part narrative would unfold, and The Crimes of Grindelwald hit theaters last month. Unfortunately, the results were far from what WB was hoping for.
Is the second Fantastic Beasts rotten?
Movies have been able to overcome negative buzz before, but the second Fantastic Beasts was not one of them. When the professional reviews started to roll in, Crimes of Grindelwald became the franchise's first installment to be Rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. To illustrate just how much of a step down in quality it is, ...
