is equality of outcome possible

Equality of outcome can be a good thing after it has been achieved since it reflects the natural "interdependence of citizens in a highly organized economy" and provides a "basis for social policies" which foster harmony and good will, including social cohesion and reduced jealousy.

Full Answer

What is equally likely outcome?

equally likely Designating the outcome s of an experiment that have the same chance of happening. The outcomes of an experiment are equally likely to occur when the probability of each outcome is equal. Equally Likely Outcomes: Two or more possible outcomes of a given situation that have the same probability.

What are the four standards of equality?

third of four standards of equality - the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point; ex. affirmative action; social engineering equality of outcome fourth of four standards of equality - position that argues that each player must end up with the same amount regardless of the fairness of the game; essentially Communist ideology; only incentive is altruistic; free rider problem

What does equality of results mean?

Equality of outcome, equality of condition, or equality of results is a political concept which is central to some political ideologies and is used regularly in political discourse, often in contrast to the term equality of opportunity. It describes a state in which people have approximately the same material wealth and income, or in which the general economic conditions of their lives are alike.

What is the definition of equality of result?

Equality of outcome, equality of condition, or equality of results is a political concept which is central to some political ideologies and is used in some political discourse, often in contrast to the term equality of opportunity. It describes a state in which all people have approximately the same material wealth and income, or in which the general economic conditions of everyone's lives are ...

What is equality outcome?

It describes a state in which all people have approximately the same material wealth and income, or in which the general economic conditions of everyone's lives are alike.

Is equality of outcome the same as equity?

Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.

Can equality of outcome be achieved?

On the other side, advocates for equality of outcome believe that systemic inequality prevents genuine equality of opportunity, and so the only way to achieve equality is through a more even distribution of wealth - such as diversity quotas and universal income (both of which we'll come back to later on).

Why is equality not possible?

Equality of opportunity necessarily leads to inequality once everyone has the same set of opportunities. These inequalities are supposedly justified because they arise solely from the talent and hard work of the individual. This raises a different and intractable problem.

Can you have equality without equity?

You can't achieve equality without implementing equity. Inequality and inequity affect almost all of the United Nations' Global Goals.

Is absolute equality possible?

Each person plays a different role in society according to their capability. There are different ranks in the society according to the work served by the person and the rewards are equivalent to the work. Therefore, absolute economic equality cannot be possible.

Is socialism an equality of outcome?

Socialists generally agree that equality of outcome rather than just formal equality (having the same legal and political rights in society) is critical in creating social cohesion, justice and satisfying basic needs (eg.

How can we make everyone equal?

7 Ways To Help Create A Gender Equal WorldVote for women. ... Divide housework and childcare equally. ... Avoid gender-specific toys. ... Denounce discrimination and sexual harassment. ... Support equal pay for equal work. ... Learn new skills.

What is inequality of outcome?

Inequality of outcomes occurs when individuals do not possess the same level of material wealth or overall living economic conditions. Development theory has largely been concerned with inequalities in standards of living, such as inequalities in income/wealth, education, health, and nutrition.

Does equality exist in today's society?

Equality today We have made huge progress towards a more equal society. Today the vast majority of us are studying, working or making friends with people from other ethnic backgrounds. Some outdated stereotypes about women have begun to fade.

What would happen if there was no equality?

Citizens would not get equal rights. Citizens would not get equal respect. Discrimination would go unrecognised. People will continue to lead a decent life.

What is the perfect equality?

Perfect equality is achieved when all members of a given nation or society share the same income level. It's often alleged within political disputes that perfect equality leads to economic inefficacy, and thus to a less productive society.

What is the actual meaning of equity?

Definition of equity 1a : justice according to natural law or right specifically : freedom from bias or favoritism. b : something that is equitable. 2a : the money value of a property or of an interest in a property in excess of claims or liens against it.

What is the difference between equality and equity with examples?

"Equality is giving everyone the same pair of shoes. Equity is giving everyone a pair of shoes that fits." — Author unknown.

What is the difference between equity and equality in education?

In the simplest terms, equity refers to an idea of fairness, while equality refers to an idea of sameness.

What is the difference between equity and equality in the workplace?

Equality gives every individual access to the same resources and opportunities. Equity differs from equality in that it accounts for specific disadvantages and obstacles that certain groups or individuals may experience on the path to obtaining the same outcome.

Why is equality of outcome important?

According to professor of politics Ed Rooksby, the concept of equality of outcome is an important one in disputes between differing political positions, since equality has overall been seen as positive and an important concept which is "deeply embedded in the fabric of modern politics". Conflict between so-called haves and have-nots has happened ...

Why are left-leaning positions criticized?

Sometimes right-leaning positions have been criticized by left-leaning positions for over-simplifying what is meant by the term equality of outcome and for construing outcomes strictly to mean precisely equal amounts for everybody.

What is equality of outcome?

Equality of outcome, equality of condition, or equality of results is a political concept which is central to some political ideologies and is used in some political discourse, often in contrast to the term equality of opportunity. It describes a state in which all people have approximately the same material wealth and income, ...

Why is there a moral underpinning for equality?

In his 1987 book The Passion for Equality, analyst Kenneth Cauthen suggested that there were moral underpinnings for having equal outcomes because there is a common good—which people both contribute to and receive benefits from— and therefore should be enjoyed in common. Cauthen argued that this was a fundamental basis for both equality of opportunity as well as equality of outcome..

What is equal results?

Achieving equal results generally entails reducing or eliminating material inequalities between individuals or households in a society and usually involves a transfer of income or wealth from wealthier to poorer individuals, or adopting other measures to promote equality of condition.

What does the Dodo say about Alice?

In the novel Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, the Dodo tells Alice that "everybody has won and all must have prizes". One analyst suggested that this quote describes the controversial concept of equality of outcome. Equality of outcome, equality of condition, or equality of results is a political concept which is central to some political ...

Which philosopher argued that people required "different things in different proportions in order to flourish"?

Rooksby wrote that Marx favored the position described in the phrase "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" and argued that this did not imply strict equality of things, but that it meant that people required "different things in different proportions in order to flourish".

What is equality of outcome?

Instead of just looking at the opportunities people are offered, equality of outcome shifts the conversation to where people actually end up.

What is the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome?

What’s the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome? Equality of outcome looks to ensure people who are disadvantaged are making gains. Equality of opportunity looks to ensure that everyone has the same opportunities to make those gains. So, while equality of opportunity focuses on a level playing field for individual ...

What is equality of opportunity?

At its core, equal opportunity means that people are all given an equal chance to ‘compete.’

What does it mean to push for equal outcomes?

Right-leaning commentators seem to make the assumption that pushing for equal outcomes means total equality in the material and social conditions of all individuals and demographic groups , which is obviously an unrealistic goal.

What are some of the biggest criticisms levelled at equality of outcome?

Some of the biggest criticisms levelled at equality of outcome are around quotas.

What are the criticisms of equality of outcome?

Criticisms of equality of outcome. Some of the biggest criticisms levelled at equality of outcome are around quotas. In an attempt to correct historical inequality, some organisations enforce diversity quotas. They essentially look to fill a set number of roles with people from minority backgrounds.

Is wealth a predictor of future success?

Wealth is the single biggest predictor of future success, not ability. According to a 2019 study, smart poor students are less likely to become wealthy by age 25 than not-so-smart rich students. Co-Author of the study, Education professor Anthony Carnevale, said:

How can we work together in a stable society?

In a stable society, we can cooperate and work towards mutually beneficial outcomes, but we do so by consciously or otherwise conforming to our own dominance hierarchies. Imagine walking around on edge all day - living in fear of predators or constantly on the lookout for easy prey, our lives would be stressful and exhausting, and we might find ourselves voluntary in lockdown ad infinitum. Hence why we concocted ways to work together rather than fight, and developed societies and systems to quell violence and theft. The chart below depicts homicide rates per one hundred thousand people in Europe from the 1700s to the late 20th Century.

What happens if both drivers go straight in Chicken?

If both drivers go straight, they crash, and so it is assumed that at least one of the drivers (the more submissive of the two) or both will swerve in order to avoid catastrophe.

How many people died in the Soviet Union?

It turns out that we’ve tried this equality of outcome thing before, and the above held true. Not only that, but in the Soviet Union alone, no fewer than 20 million people were put to death by the dictatorship of the proletariat, one that frowned upon independence of thought.

Why is forced intervention necessary?

Given that equality of outcome is inherently unnatural, forced interventions are required to put everyone in the same place. This effectively amounts to authoritarianism whereby a central body ultimately plays God at the expense of people’s own free will and agency.

What is the difference between the white man and the black man?

The white man has access to a rope , whereas the Black man also has a rope but it is out of reach. As a result, the white man reaches the summit whilst the Black man stays at the foot of the mountain. In the video, narrated by Harris, she says that “it’s about giving people the resources and support they need so that everyone can be on equal ...

Why is redistributing wealth important?

Whilst redistributing wealth is a tax policy that might solve for short term inequality, and help give socioeconomically disadvantaged people a leg up, over-taxing effectively amounts to a short-term view and undermines society at large , which ultimately benefits from innovation-led growth in the long-term.

How much does the NBA make a year?

This is echoed by player salaries in the NBA versus the WNBA. The NBA generates US$7.4 billion per year (compared to the WNBA’s US$60 million), so it makes sense that one of its biggest stars, LeBron James, makes US$37 million a year, and that the WNBA’s stars make a fraction of this.

What is equality of outcome?

Equality of outcome or equality of results means the state or quality of being equal correspondence in degree, ability, value, quantity or rank unhampered by artificial barriers or prejudices or preferences except when particular distinctions can be explicitly justified.

What is equality of opportunity?

Equality of opportunity means a state of fairness in which job applicants are treated similarly, unhampered by artificial barriers or prejudices, except when particular distinctions can be explicitly justified.

Why should equality be divided into equality of opportunity and equality of outcome?

In my opinion, equality should be divided into equality of opportunity and equality of outcome to prevent misunderstandings. Equality of opportunity on the other hand is something worthwhile to pursue. As maximizing every individual’s skills makes the world a better place in every way possible.

Why is equality of opportunity important?

Equality of opportunity on the other hand is something worthwhile to pursue. As maximizing every individual’s skills makes the world a better place in every way possible. Not only does it maximize the individual’s unique strengths and quality of life, but the people around will also benefit from the increased quality that every individual can provide.

What does it mean to believe in individualism?

If you believe in individualism then you believe that every human being is unique and different. This automatically means that equality of outcome is not possible and not desirable to pursue.

What are some examples of equal education?

For example, every person should get the chance to go to school and get an equal education, another example is that everyone should have the opportunity to get a job. Everyone should also get the opportunity to get decent healthcare and so on.

Why is identity politics never good?

Identity politics are never good because it has little regards and value for the individual and the individual’s personal responsibility.

What is equality of outcome?

Equality of Outcome: Anything other than perfect equality shows discrimination, and we all ought to have the same amount (i.e. outcome.)

Why doesn't equality of outcome work?

For one, it’s impossible to apply:people are neither able nor willing to willingly distribute their wealth proportiona

Why is equality of outcome unachievable?

Equality of outcome is unachievable because of the simple fact we are all unique. Therefore, in any given situation one will be better than another. Equality of opportunity we have done well, more work to do, but the strides we have made amazing. In fact, it's just been reported that Google has actually been paying some women more then men doing the same job. Appears the men now have a glass ceiling.

What is Dalrymple's answer to equality of opportunity?

As with my comments about equality of material condition, the obvious question raised by Dalrymple’s arguments is: So what? Granting that absolute equality of opportunity could only be achieved through totalitarian means, given that no one proposes achieving this equality through such means, why should we be concerned about more modest efforts to reduce or eliminate unequal opportunities in our society? Dalrymple’s answer is that “ [w]hile giving people equal opportunities is impossible, giving everyone, or at least the vast majority of people, a considerable level of opportunity is not impossible. And yet, often in the very name of equality of opportunity, we have created a society many of whose members have far fewer opportunities than they could and ought to have.”

What is equality of opportunity?

Equality of opportunity is a thoroughly nasty and totalitarian concept. It is the demand that no one should start (or continue) life with any advantages relative to another. But how could such a condition actually be achieved? Leaving aside genetic differences, which must persist until all hereditary endowments can be made precisely the same, and which for the time being must be accepted even though they are unfair (not unjust, although most people nowadays seem to have difficulty distinguishing between the two), the only way environmental factors affecting opportunities can be made equal is by social engineering on a scale that would make North Korea look like a paradise of laissez-faire.

How do Jane and John compare?

Alright. Let's start off with 2 people. Jane, and John. They have no difference in anything else other then their intelligence. They both have coding jobs at company X. This is Equality of Opportunity. They start the same. John's IQ is 20 points above Jane's, so, naturally he will be more efficient at his job. John pumps out 5 more products a day then Jane because his on-the-job training helped him more then her, as she is less intelligent and 6 hours wasn't enough to make her great at her job. As John gets a raise, she starts to mumble under he b

What should social policy be focused on?

The focus of social policy ought to be on increasing opportunity, not on increasing equality of opportunity, just as it should be focused on increasing the material conditions of the members of a society rather than simply the equality of material conditions. The goals of creating “more equality” and “more opportunity” may seem quite similar, but they are in fact sometimes diametrically opposed. The latter seeks to give to the poor the opportunities had by the rich, whereas the later can be achieved just as well holding the rich and middle classes back as by lifting the poor up. And if we forget this, we may find ourselves .

What is formal equality of opportunity?

Formal equality of opportunity. One understanding of equality of opportunity is that it only requires legal equality, which is realised when everyone is treated equally before the law. This is referred to as formal equality of opportunity. British philosopher Bernard Williams offered a useful rejoinder to this claim.

Why is inequality justified?

These inequalities are supposedly justified because they arise solely from the talent and hard work of the individual. This raises a different and intractable problem.

Why do we oppose meritocracy?

One reason to oppose this is the likely psychological damage to children. Another reason is that too much personal liberty would have to be sacrificed to the requirements of equality of opportunity.

How can equality of opportunity be achieved?

To fully achieve equality of opportunity would require something along the lines of Plato’s Republic, where children are removed from their parents and raised communally. Such a system provides the same conditions for all to ensure a true meritocracy.

What is the dominant Western idea of equality?

The dominant Western idea of equality opposes caste systems but not hierarchy. As American political philosopher Richard Arneson says: When equality of opportunity prevails, the assignment of places in the hierarchy is determined by some form of competitive process, and all members of society are eligible to compete on equal terms.

What would Plato's community be unable to decide?

We would be unable to decide what people deserve in Plato’s community, where each child starts from the same position, let alone in our own society where children begin from very different starting points. When an idea asks for the impossible it might be time to reconsider and start thinking of equality in terms of outcomes rather than opportunities.

Why does Williams say that members of group A will continue to dominate?

Williams suggests that members of group A will continue to dominate because they still have massive advantages due to their previous legal – and current social and economic – privileges. Formal equality of opportunity might solve one problem – if we assume financial clout does not provide any legal advantage – but it leaves many others unaddressed.

What Is Equality of Outcome?

See more on diversity.social

Equality of Outcome vs. Equality of Opportunity

Equality of Autonomy

The Bottom Line