
Why was 2008 a good year for Champagne? Despite the inauspicious start, the end results for Champagne were surprisingly excellent. The harvest was successful and the resulting wines were fresh and refined with rich, ripe fruit and balanced acidity.
Full Answer
Are there any good wines to drink in 2008?
Although, there was little in the way of wine to set the world on fire in 2008, with the exception of Champagne and Tokaj, some very nice wines were made. There will be a range of whites, reds, bubbles and stickies still drinking well now. However, easier-drinking wines are likely to be past their best.
What makes a great vintage year for Champagne?
Unlike Bordeaux or Burgundy, however, it’s arguably more of a challenge to identify a great vintage year across the region because of the many variables at play. Champagne relies on two grape varieties, for example: Pinot Noir and Chardonnay. A good year for one does not necessarily mean a good year for the other.
What is a good rating for Champagne in France?
France Champagne < Return to All Regions Vintage ratings: 95-100, classic; 90-94, outstanding; 85-89, very good; 80-84, good; 75-79, mediocre; 50-74, not recommended A score range indicates preliminary analysis based on barrel samples and/or a limited sampling; many wines of the vintage not yet reviewed.
Does a good year mean a good champagne?
A good year for one does not necessarily mean a good year for the other. Then there are the vast differences between Champagne houses – each has its own individual slant on its winemaking process. Take the revered Salon, for example.

Why was 2008 a good year for Champagne?
Despite the inauspicious start, the end results for Champagne were surprisingly excellent. The harvest was successful and the resulting wines were fresh and refined with rich, ripe fruit and balanced acidity. The only other hiccup the vintage faced was the devastating 2008 global recession, which decimated prices.
Is 2008 a good Champagne vintage?
2008 One of the best two vintages of this decade. A return to a classic, dry style in a cooler year. Powerful fruit and scintillating acidity in complete harmony.
Is 2008 a good year for Dom Perignon?
The 2008 Vintage is known as one of the best if not the best vintage ever in Champagne. The 2008 Dom Pérignon scores more than 2.5 points on average than the legendary 1988 vintage, which today costs more than 10 times more than when released in the late 90s - if available at all.
What year is good for Champagne?
The latter half of the decade saw some very good results in Champagne, with the 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 are scoring solidly in the 90s with Robert Parker – the 1996 is perhaps the most legendary of this period, with a dry summer with long bursts of sunshine producing a vintage of outstanding quality.
Is Champagne from 2009 still good?
2009 Vintage - Champagne The 2009 vintage for Champagne was exceptionally good. A dry winter left the soils bereft of moisture. However, spring brought much needed rain and both budburst and flowering were successful.
Was 2021 a good year for Champagne?
Even though quantity is certainly reduced, initial reports across the entire region are that quality is strong. 2021 stands in contrast to 2020, generally an excellent vintage for quality and quantity in Champagne.
How Long Will 2008 Dom Pérignon last?
How long does Dom Perignon last? Your cherished (unopened) Dom Perignon bottle can last for 5 to 10 years or more - if stored properly! Once you uncork it, it could have a shelf life of around 3-5 days.
How do you store Dom Perignon 2008?
To help your Dom Perignon maintain its quality, store in a cool place between 45 - 65°F (7 - 18°C) and ensure that the temperature stays as constant as possible.
Is Cristal better than Dom Perignon?
So which is the best champagne out of the two? Based on the Luxury Institute's Luxury Brand Status Index survey of Champagnes and Sparkling Wines, Dom Perignon was the clear winner. The HNWI cited Dom Perignon as “synonymous with the best in champagne”, for its consistent high quality, superb taste and social status.
Is 2012 a good Champagne vintage?
The 2012 vintage for Champagne was, by all accounts, excellent despite the growing season throwing enough curve balls to make most producers nervous. The relatively warm winter moved into an extremely wet spring and both frost and a particularly vicious hailstorm devastated yields.
Is 2017 a good year Champagne?
The quality of some Chardonnays was fair to good, but 2017 produced poor quality Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier, and the paucity of grapes means that Champagne houses risk running down their reserves at a time of record sales. A difficult year for Champagne got underway with a mild winter followed by a cool early spring.
What is classed as vintage Champagne?
You'll always be able to tell a vintage from a non-vintage, as the year of harvest will appear on the bottle of the former. Vintage Champagnes can be kept for up 10 years, while non-vintages have been aged for a minimum of 15 months in producer's cellars, and are therefore ready to drink straight off the shelf.
Does Dom Perignon get better with age?
Does champagne get better with age? Many of the best champagne labels, such as Moët & Chandon, Veuve Clicquot, and Dom Perignon have vintages that are specifically made to age nicely.
Is 20 year old Champagne drinkable?
Yes, 20 year old Champagne is drinkable but it won't be that great. It'll likely be flat and dull. It could take on a cool nutty characteristic but everything we love about Champagne will likely be gone.
Was 2009 a good year for Dom Perignon?
The 2009 Champagne Dom Perignon has enjoyed great critical acclaim: James Suckling gave this 2009 Dom Perignon vintage a 97 while complimenting the vintage's energy and gorgeous aromas of mango, honeysuckle, and cream.
How much is a bottle of Dom Perignon?
How much does Dom Pérignon cost? A bottle of Dom Pérignon starts at around $185 while older bottles grow in price exponentially. The most expensive bottle — Dom Pérignon Rose 1959 — costs $84,700.
What happened to Champagne in 2017?
Severe frosts in the third week of April then eliminated between 20% and 70% of the potential crop, depending on sub-region (the Côte des Bars was worst affected). After that, the weather was exceptionally hot and sunny up to the end of July, breaking many of the region’s heat records. Storms and hail then caused further losses at the beginning of August, and harvest eventually got underway in late August, though the official date was September 4th (which many, with hindsight, considered too late). It was interrupted by heavy rain, and botrytis outbreaks meant that the grapes had to be carefully sorted. The quality of some Chardonnays was fair to good, but 2017 produced poor quality Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier, and the paucity of grapes means that Champagne houses risk running down their reserves at a time of record sales.
When did Chardonnay flower?
A long winter and cool spring meant that the Chardonnay didn’t flower until mid-June and the two Pinots in mid-July: a very late date, and potentially disastrous. There was hail damage in the Marne at the end of July. Overall, though, July and August were record-breakingly hot and sunny, saving the vintage and meaning that the early September rain was welcome. Good conditions then resumed for an October harvest of tense and acidic but good quality fruit, ideal for ageing. A vintage year for most.
What is a moderate yield wine?
Moderate yields; wines of moderate concentration & acidity. Overall sugar-acid ratio dropped to level of 1990s from higher maturities of 2000s. Declared vintage by many récoltants-manipulants (individual growers).
When did Champagne grapes bloom?
May and June were warm and flowering took place early and quickly – by 9 June. June was one of the hottest ever recorded in Champagne and saw some hail storms but some vineyards were spared hail damage. July and August remained very hot and dry causing rise in sugar and drop in grape acidity.
What caused the ripening of Chardonnay in 2004?
The drought in 2003 followed by low rainfall in the winter and spring of 2004 meant low ground-water levels throughout the Champagne area that promoted ripening and helped reduce fungal infection, limited to a few cases of powdery mildew among some of the Chardonnay plantings.
Which wine is the least affected by the chaotic weather and uneven ripening?
Chardonnay was the least affected by the chaotic weather and uneven ripening and is the most consistent in terms of ripeness. The maturity of both Pinot Meunier and Pinot Noir is more varied as the varieties suffered from attacks of mildew and botrytis in several spots.
What happened to the vines in April?
However, the end of April brought with it some frost, which damaged a number of vineyards, reducing the potential crop. Temperatures picked up in May and the sun shone for much of the month, but a cold snap affected the flowering.
Why did my grape vines set so quickly in 2005?
Fruit set quickly due to the extremely fine weather. Without being an especially hot summer in general, July 2005 was quite warm but wet, while August was dry but cooler than usual. These conditions helped steady healthy vine development and then a very hot period from the 26th of August led to acelerated ripening.
Is August a dry season?
This year was generally a dry, warm year. Though August began with bursts of rain followed by high temperatures then thunderstorms at the end of the month. Rain continued though early September followed by clear skies that lasted throughout the harvest with the exception of light drizzle from 22 to 23 September.
Is Chardonnay vintage?
Not vintage quality but Chardonnay is stalwart of NV blends.
Which country produced the best wine in 2008?
However, California, New Zealand, South Africa, Argentina and Chile also produced some very good wines. Although, there was little in the way of wine to set the world on fire in 2008, with the exception of Champagne and Tokaj, ...
Is Champagne a great wine?
Champagne delivered a legendary year, producing some truly great wines. However, for the Rhône Valley and the Loire, the vintage was more lackluster. For Italy, Spain, Germany, Austria and Port, the year was excellent, however, for Tokaj the year was legendary.
Was the 2008 vintage good?
Overall, the 2008 vintage was good but, for most regions, it stopped short of being truly excellent. It is also worth mentioning that much of the 2008 vintage would suffer in the wake of the 2008 global recession, which heavily disrupted the financial world. In Europe, the growing season was cooler than usual, resulting in a year ...
What years were the 80s champagne?
Like the 1990s, the ‘80s was also a chequered decade. However, followers of Robert Parker can’t really go wrong with his assessments of this period’s Champagnes, as the only vintages he tasted ended up scoring highly with the critic. These include the 1982, 1985, 1988 and 1989, all of which were awarded 95 points, save the 1982 which scored 94.
What years were Champagne in the 90s?
The latter half of the decade saw some very good results in Champagne, with the 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 are scoring solidly in the 90s with Robert Parker – the 1996 is perhaps the most legendary of this period, with a dry summer with long bursts of sunshine producing a vintage of outstanding quality. The 1990 was highly regarded.
How many points does Parker's 1993 have?
The intervening years proved something of a disappointment, however – Parker didn’t even taste the 1991, 1992 or 1994, and gave the 1993 a relatively average 88 points. These harvests were hit by late rains, meaning any usable grapes were generally kept for non-vintage wines.
Is the 2008 Champagne vintage good?
The 2008 is arguably the standout so far since the turn of the century however, with Parker awarding it 99 points. Its success was something of a surprise to all, since the year opened with widespread mildew meaning expectations were low. The 2000 and 2002 have also been very well received.
