what are the 15 logical fallacies

15 Types of Logical Fallacies

• — Ad Hominem An ad hominem fallacy uses personal attacks rather than logic. ...
• — Straw Man A straw man argument attacks a different subject rather than the topic being discussed — often a more extreme version of the counter argument. ...
• — Appeal to Ignorance ...
• — False Dilemma/False Dichotomy ...
• — Slippery Slope ...
• — Circular Argument ...
• — Hasty Generalization ...
• — Red Herring ...

Full Answer

What is the most common logical fallacy?

Spotting 10 Common Logical Fallacies

1. Strawman Fallacy. When you misrepresent the argument to make it easy to attack, you’ve created a strawman. ...
2. Logical Fallacy Slippery Slope. We use the same example above, “A” says we should put more money into health and education. ...
3. The Poor Argument Fallacy. ...
4. Substituting the Burden of Proof Fallacy. ...
5. Logical Fallacy Ad Hominem. ...
6. Personal Incredulity Fallacy. ...

More items...

What are 5 common fallacies?

Common Fallacies

• Reductive fallacy. —We commit this fallacy when we try to address complex issues with simple solutions. ...
• Post hoc ergo propter hoc. —This fallacy literally means “after this, therefore because of this.” We make this error when we assert that A caused B simply because A preceded ...
• Non sequitur. ...
• Appeal to majority. ...

What are the 4 types of fallacies?

What are the six examples of fallacy?

• Hasty Generalization. A Hasty Generalization is an informal fallacy where you base decisions on insufficient evidence. …
• Appeal to Authority. …
• Appeal to Tradition. …
• Post hoc ergo propter hoc. …
• False Dilemma. …
• The Narrative Fallacy. …
• 6 Logical Fallacies That Can Ruin Your Growth.

What are the list of fallacies?

• Absurd Extrapolation: see Slippery Slope
• Abusive Ad Hominem: see Attack the person
• Accent: Emphasis that changes the meaning of the sentence.
• Accident: A general rule used to explain a specific case not covered by it.
• Ad Antiquitatem: see Appeal to Tradition
• Ad Baculum: see Appeal to Fear
• Ad Hominem: see Attack the person

More items...

What are the 8 common logical fallacy that we discuss?

Take a look at fifteen of the most commonly used logical fallacies.1 Ad hominem. ... 2 Red herring. ... 3 Straw man. ... 4 Equivocation. ... 5 Slippery slope. ... 6 Hasty generalization. ... 7 Appeal to authority. ... 8 False dilemma.More items...•

What is the 10 fallacy?

Fallacies refer to flaws within the logic or reasoning of an argument. Ten fallacies of reasoning discussed in this chapter are hasty generalization, false analogy, false cause, false authority, false dilemma, ad hominem, slippery slope, red herring, and appeal to tradition.

What are the 5 fallacies?

Let us consider five of the most common informal logical fallacies—arguments that may sound convincing but actually rely on a flaw in logic.(1) Red Herring Fallacy. ... (2) Strawman Fallacy. ... (3) Slippery Slope Fallacy. ... (4) Begging the Question Fallacy. ... (5) Post Hoc Fallacy.

What are examples of logical fallacies?

Circular Reasoning A fallacy of logos where A is because of B, and B is because of A, e.g., 'You can't get a job without experience, and you can't get experience without a job. ' Also refers to falsely arguing that something is true by repeating the same statement in different words.

What are the six fallacies?

6 Logical Fallacies That Can Ruin Your GrowthHasty Generalization. A Hasty Generalization is an informal fallacy where you base decisions on insufficient evidence. ... Appeal to Authority. ... Appeal to Tradition. ... Post hoc ergo propter hoc. ... False Dilemma. ... The Narrative Fallacy. ... 6 Logical Fallacies That Can Ruin Your Growth.

What is the most used fallacy?

The ad hominem is one of the most common logical fallacies. While it can take many forms — from name calling and insults, to attacking a person's character, to questioning their motives, to calling them hypocrites — any argument that targets the source, rather than the argument, is an ad hominem.

What are the 3 types of fallacies?

The common fallacies are usefully divided into three categories: Fallacies of Relevance, Fallacies of Unacceptable Premises, and Formal Fallacies. Many of these fallacies have Latin names, perhaps because medieval philosophers were particularly interested in informal logic.

What are the 2 types of fallacies?

There are two types of fallacies: formal and informal. Formal: Formal fallacies are arguments that have invalid structure, form, or context errors. Informal: Informal fallacies are arguments that have irrelevant or incorrect premises.

Which are examples of informal fallacies?

Informal FallaciesAd Hominem.Appeal to Ignorance.Begging the Question.Confusion of Necessary with a Sufficient Condition.Equivocation.False Dilemma.Faulty Analogy.Inconsistency.More items...

How many fallacies are there in logic?

There are two main types of fallacies: A formal fallacy is an argument with a premise and conclusion that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. An informal fallacy is an error in the form, content, or context of the argument.

How do you identify logical fallacies?

Bad proofs, wrong number of choices, or a disconnect between the proof and conclusion. To spot logical fallacies, look for bad proof, the wrong number of choices, or a disconnect between the proof and the conclusion.

How do you use logical fallacies in a sentence?

They argue that all their high school friends are doing it because some celebrity just got this new tattoo. Now, whatever your feelings about tattoos, this is a logical fallacy. Just because everyone's getting this tattoo doesn't mean it's the right choice for your kid.

What are the 3 types of fallacies?

The common fallacies are usefully divided into three categories: Fallacies of Relevance, Fallacies of Unacceptable Premises, and Formal Fallacies. Many of these fallacies have Latin names, perhaps because medieval philosophers were particularly interested in informal logic.

What is fallacy and its types?

Logical fallacies are flawed, deceptive, or false arguments that can be proven wrong with reasoning. There are two main types of fallacies: A formal fallacy is an argument with a premise and conclusion that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. An informal fallacy is an error in the form, content, or context of the argument.

What is a common fallacy?

Five of the most common fallacies are the Appeal to Ignorance, the False Dilemma, the False Cause, Ambiguity, and the Red Herring.

What kind of fallacy is Colgate?

Colgate uses false authority because the Doctors are normally not fully qualified to be Doctors. *Summary- If you have bad dental hygiene, use Colgate and it will fix everything.

1. Ad Hominem

The ad hominem fallacy is the classic case of attacking your opponent instead of her arguments. Instead of logic, this fallacy relies on personal attacks that are not relevant to the discussion at hand.

2. Hasty Generalization

A hasty generalization is when a broad claim is made based on just a few examples, and not substantial proof.

3. Straw Man Argument

The straw man argument is when you anticipate your opponent’s counter-argument, but present a weak version that can easily be torn down. And pushing over a straw man is hardly impressive!

4. False Dichotomy

In a false dichotomy, the arguer presents just two solutions to a problem. These are usually extreme and polar opposite of one another, so only one appears acceptable.

5. Post Hoc

A post hoc fallacy confuses correlation with causation. It assumes that because B happens after or around A, then A must cause B. This is also usually based on just one or a few observations.

6. Red Herring Fallacy

Red herrings serve to distract an audience and shift their attention away from the original topic, often toward a false conclusion.

7. Bandwagon Fallacy

The old “everyone else is doing it” fallacy—since others seem to agree with it, it must be right.

What are logical fallacies?

Logical fallacies -- those logical gaps that invalidate arguments -- aren't always easy to spot. While some come in the form of loud, glaring inconsistencies, others can easily fly under the radar, sneaking into everyday meetings and conversations undetected. Having an understanding of these basic logical fallacies can help you more confidently ...

What is the common fallacy of two mutually exclusive outcomes?

Instead of acknowledging that most (if not all) issues can be thought of on a spectrum of possibilities and stances, the false dilemma fallacy asserts that there are only two mutually exclusive outcomes.

What is the fallacy of anecdotal evidence?

In place of logical evidence, this fallacy substitutes examples from someone's personal experience. Arguments that rely heavily on anecdotal evidence tend to overlook the fact that one (possibly isolated) example can't stand alone as definitive proof of a greater premise.

What is the fallacy of a proposition?

This fallacy occurs when someone draws expansive conclusions based on inadequate or insufficient evidence . In other words, they jump to conclusions about the validity of a proposition with some -- but not enough -- evidence to back it up, and overlook potential counterarguments.

What is the fallacy of setting up a straw man?

This fallacy occurs when your opponent over-simplifies or misrepresents your argument (i.e., setting up a "straw man") to make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of fully addressing your actual argument, speakers relying on this fallacy present a superficially similar -- but ultimately not equal -- version of your real stance, helping them create the illusion of easily defeating you.

Does popularity make an argument true?

Just because a significant population of people believe a proposition is true, doesn't automatically make it true. Popularity alone is not enough to validate an argument, though it's often used as a standalone justification of validity.

Is it dangerous to appeal to authority?

While appeals to authority are by no means always fallacious, they can quickly become dangerous when you rely too heavily on the opinion of a single person -- especially if that person is attempting to validate something outside of their expertise.

Why is it important to understand logical fallacies?

Understanding common logical fallacies is an important part of judging other's arguments and crafting your own. When you use logic that is consistent and makes sense, your employer and colleagues are more likely to take your arguments seriously.

What is the drawback of the fallacy?

The main drawback of this kind of fallacy is that it makes the other party look unreasonable.

How does the Tu Quoque fallacy invalidate an opponent's criticism?

Rather than coming up with a valid counter-argument, those using the tu quoque fallacy invalidate their opponent's criticisms by addressing them with another criticism. With this kind of argument, you find a way to attack your opponent instead of coming up with a logical reason to argue against their original claim.

What is the fallacy of denying counterexamples?

This fallacy is when one person protects their generalized claim by denying counterexamples. They do this by changing the initial terms of their generalization to invalidate any counterexamples that might exist.

Why is the straw man fallacy called the straw man fallacy?

The straw man fallacy. The straw man fallacy gets its name because it is an argument that is thin and has no substance. It occurs when your opponent argues against a position you aren't even trying to present. With this tactic, they tend to misrepresent or alter the points you are making.

What is anecdotal evidence fallacy?

Rather than using hard facts and data, people using the anecdotal evidence fallacy base their arguments on their own experiences. These kinds of arguments focus on emotions over logic. They do not recognize that one person's experience may not provide sufficient evidence to make a generalized claim.

What is the bandwagon fallacy?

The bandwagon fallacy. This fallacy is based on the idea that if many people agree on the same point, it must be true. The issue with this kind of argument is that just because an idea is popular, it is not automatically right or true. When people use this kind of argument, it can lead to major issues for the company.

What is the fallacy of a psychologist?

The Fallacy of a Psychologist is assuming the fact that human beings are unbiased audiences. This is the act of citing the reading of scriptures as objective reading for oneself but for the others it is human opinion.

What is a formal fallacy?

Wikipdeia defines Logical fallacy as: In philosophy, a formal fallacy (also called logical fallacy) is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic. An argument that is formally fallacious is always considered wrong.

What is the practice of attacking an individual's character and not his or her argument?

Ad Hominem is the practice of attacking an individual’s character and not his or her argument. This explains the fact that while an argument goes on, people start attacking the character of an individual rather than being precise about the topic of the argument.

What is moral equivalence?

Moral Equivalence – Laying down a particular complicated moral event as being quite identical to the other.

What is correlation equals causality?

Correlation equals Causation is the act of assuming that since two important things took place simultaneously, one was caused due to the other. Many a times, you might have heard professionals saying that there is an increase in the intelligence of people who listen to classical music. This is because there is a correlation between intelligence and classical music and this has been found out through studies conducted on this subject.

Is logic a bad fallacy?

However, there are a number of bad reasoning that come from human beings. Logical fallacies possess limited value. Pointing out the fact that logic is the end of every argument is itself a kind of logical fallacy. This is basically a circular argument because it is strongly believed that logic is quote authoritative but this does not mean that logic is completely useless. It would be correct to say that logic is a useful tool but it should not be used in the form of an authoritative tool.

What is a fallacy in psychology?

Definition of a 'Fallacy'. A misconception resulting from flaw in reasoning, or a trick or illusion in thoughts that often succeeds in obfuscating facts/truth. Fallacies marked by an * are more common.

What is a formal fallacy?

A formal fallacy is defined as an error that can be seen within the argument's form. Every formal fallacy is a non sequitur (or, an argument where the conclusion does not follow from the premise.)

What is an argument based on insufficient evidence?

An argument based on insufficient evidence; one looking only at a small group as representative of the whole.

What is ex forcing students to attend cultural events?

Ex-Forcing students to attend cultural events is like herding cattle to slaughter. The students stampede in to the event where they are systematically 'put to sleep' by the program

Is the slippery slope inevitable?

Suggesting that one step will inevitably lead to more, eventually negative steps. While sometimes the results may be negative, the slippery slope argues that the descent is inevitable and unalterable

What is the Causal Fallacy?

The Causal Fallacy is any logical breakdown when identifying a cause. You can think of the Causal Fallacy as a parent category for several different fallacies about unproven causes.

What is the bandwagon fallacy?

The bandwagon fallacy assumes something is true (or right, or good) because other people agree with it. A couple different fallacies can be included under this label, since they are often indistinguishable in practice. The ad populum fallacy (Lat., “to the populous/popularity”) is when something is accepted because it’s popular. The concensus gentium (Lat., “consensus of the people”) is when something is accepted because the relevant authorities or people all agree on it. And the status appeal fallacy is when something is considered true, right, or good because it has the reputation of lending status, making you look “popular,” “important,” or “successful.” For our purposes, we’ll treat all of these fallacies together as the Bandwagon Fallacy. According to legend, politicians would parade through the streets of their district trying to draw a crowd and gain attention so people would vote for them. And whoever supported that candidate was invited to literally jump on board the bandwagon. Hence the nickname “Bandwagon Fallacy.” This tactic is common among advertisers. “If you want to be like Mike (Jordan), you’d better eat your Wheaties.” “Drink Gatorade because that’s what all the professional athletes do to stay hydrated.” “McDonald’s has served over 99 billion, so you should let them serve you too.” The form of hist argument often looks like this: “Many people do or think X, so you ought to do or think X too.” One problem with this kind of reasoning is that the broad acceptance of some claim or action is not always a good indication that the acceptance is justified. People can be mistaken, confused, deceived, or even willfully irrational. And when people act together, sometimes they become even more foolish—i.e., “mob mentality.” People can be quite gullible, and this fact doesn’t suddenly change when applied to large groups. Which of these is a bandwagon fallacy?

What is the black and white fallacy?

This fallacy has a few other names: “black-and-white fallacy,” “either-or fallacy,” “false dichotomy,” and “bifurcation fallacy.” This line of reasoning fails by limiting the options to two when there are in fact more options to choose from. Sometimes the choices are between one thing, the other thing, or both things together (they don’t exclude each other). Sometimes there are a whole range of options, three, four, five, or a hundred and forty-five. However it may happen, the false dichotomy fallacy errs by oversimplifying the range of options.

What is the straw man fallacy?

In the straw man fallacy, someone attacks a position the opponent doesn’t really hold. Instead of contending with the actual argument, he or she instead attacks the equivalent of a lifeless bundle of straw, an easily defeated effigy, which the opponent never intended upon defending anyway.

Is ignorance a fallacious appeal?

Any time ignorance is used as a major premise in support of an argument, it’s liable to be a fallacious appeal to ignorance. Naturally, we are all ignorant of many things, but it is cheap and manipulative to allow this unfortunate aspect of the human condition to do most of our heavy lifting in an argument.