
But, moral muteness is unusual because this is a case where moral principles are used. So, why not talk about them? Bird and Walters identify three specific causes for this phenomenon: a threat to harmony, a threat to efficiency, and a threat to the image of power and effectiveness.
Why don't we talk about moral muteness?
We usually refer to them as hypocrites. But, moral muteness is unusual due to the fact that this is a case where moral principles are used. So, why not talk about them? Bird and Walters identify three specific causes for this phenomenon: threat to harmony, threat to efficiency, and threat to image of power and effectiveness.
Should we become “morally mute”?
Whether they are probable or not they are not worth the potential benefits of moral discourse. So, the easiest option is to become “morally mute.” But, there are costs to moral muteness. In fact, these may be greater than the risks to harmony, efficiency, power and effectiveness. But, because they’re not as obvious they are often ignored.
What is moral myopia and moral muteness?
Moral muteness is when we communicate in ways that obscure our moral beliefs and commitments, or dont voice moral sentiments at all. For teaching moral myopia and moral muteness, instructors can often tie in current events or scandals that likely involved moral myopia and moral muteness on the part of a number of people.
What happens when morality is not discussed?
Neglect of moral abuses: In a climate where morality is not discussed it usually doesn’t take long for morality not to be applied. If moral muteness is the phenomenon of using moral criteria to make decisions but not discussing them, it seems that this can potentially lead to the much worse situation where moral criteria are ignored completely.

What causes moral muteness?
Moral muteness occurs when people witness unethical behavior and choose not to say anything. It can also occur when people communicate in ways that obscure their moral beliefs and commitments. When we see others acting unethically, often the easiest thing to do is look the other way.
What are the three types of morals?
Three common frameworks are deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics.
What are the three levels of moral myopia?
While evidence of moral myopia regarding ethical issues was found at all three levels—that of the individual, the organization, and society—moral shortsightedness was most acute at the societal level.
How is moral muteness related to hypocrisy?
Abstract. What is moral muteness? People are morally mute if they fail forthrightly to voice moral concern regarding issues about which they possess moral convictions. Hypocrites act deceptively, claiming moral convictions that they do not in fact hold.
What are the 4 types of morality?
In discussing the application of morality, four aspects may be considered: religious moral- ity, morality and nature, individual morality, and social morality.
What are the types of morals?
There are two types of moral principles: absolute and relative....Absolute Moral PrinciplesDon't kill.Speak the truth.Be careful with what you say and do to others.Respect the property of others.Treat people in need or distress as we would want to be treated if our situation were reversed.
What causes moral myopia?
0:041:42Moral Myopia | Ethics Defined - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipOr meeting sales targets that ethical issues are obscured. Organizations can experience moral myopiaMoreOr meeting sales targets that ethical issues are obscured. Organizations can experience moral myopia too as major league baseball did during the steroid era.
What is an example of moral blindness?
An extreme version of moral myopia is called moral blindness. For example, people may become so focused on other aspects of a situation, like pleasing their professor or boss or meeting sales targets, that ethical issues are obscured.
How advertising practitioners view ethics moral muteness moral myopia and moral imagination?
We find that the reasons for moral muteness and moral myopia are categorizable. There were, however, "seeing/talking" advertising practitioners who demonstrated "moral imagination" when responding to ethical problems.
What is moral hypocrisy?
Moral hypocrisy is the motivation to appear moral, while, if possible, avoiding the cost of being moral. This is in opposition to moral integrity, which is the motivation to act in accord with moral principles—to actually be moral.
What is an example of moral imagination?
For example, consider Nestle Foods. The company refused to target young children with advertising for its high sugar, high fat products. Instead, to keep the company competitive in that market, it innovated and created new, healthier products to advertise to young children.
What is hypocrisy in ethics?
Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticizes another or the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform. In moral psychology, it is the failure to follow one's own expressed moral rules and principles.
What are 5 good morals?
5 Moral Values All Kids Should KnowRespecting Different Cultures. Children are exposed to different cultures in their immediate social environment in an increasingly globalized world. ... Honesty. ... Compassion. ... Interest in Education. ... Not Harming others.
What are some common morals?
While morals tend to be driven by personal beliefs and values, there are certainly some common morals that most people agree on, such as:Always tell the truth.Do not destroy property.Have courage.Keep your promises.Do not cheat.Treat others as you want to be treated.Do not judge.Be dependable.More items...
How many morals are there?
Anthropologists at the University of Oxford have discovered what they believe to be seven universal moral rules.
What are good morals?
Good moral character and reputation means the possession of honesty and truthfulness, trustworthiness and reliability, and a professional commitment to the legal process and the administration of justice, as well as the condition of being regarded as possessing such qualities.
What is moral muteness?
What exactly is moral muteness? As explained in the article this occurs when people behave according to moral principles yet do not talk about morality when discussing these decisions. That is, people are using moral principles to make the decisions they make but they don’t say they’re doing this. This is a unique situation inasmuch as it is much less common than other cases outlined in figure one: Relations Between Moral Action and Speech. Of course, there is nothing particularly odd about a person who uses moral principles and talks about them. There’s even nothing too unusual about a person who talks about moral principles but doesn’t follow them. We usually refer to them as hypocrites. But, moral muteness is unusual due to the fact that this is a case where moral principles are used. So, why not talk about them?
What is the phenomenon of using moral criteria to make decisions but not discussing them?
Neglect of moral abuses: In a climate where morality is not discussed it usually doesn’t take long for morality not to be applied. If moral muteness is the phenomenon of using moral criteria to make decisions but not discussing them, it seems that this can potentially lead to the much worse situation where moral criteria are ignored completely. Which will quite naturally lead to…
What is the creation of moral amnesia?
Creation of moral amnesia: This is a fancy way of saying that by neglecting moral discourse the impression is created that morality is not a part of the business world. That is business is an amoral (not immoral) activity. Business decisions are made purely on the basis of profit and loss and shareholder concerns. But, these are moral values and moral discourse is relevant to each of them.
What happens when we stop discussing our liberties?
Decreased authority of moral standard: In a famous essay titled On Liberty John Stuart Mill argues that when we cease to discuss our liberties we cease to believe we have them or understand the reasons why we do have them. A similar thing can happen with morality. When we cease to have vigorous conversations which include moral concepts we cease to take moral concepts seriously and cease to recognize their authority. This also can lead to a sense of fatalism. Sure, things are bad but nothing can be done to improve them. This line of thinking is all too common in many corporate environments and often prevents much needed improvements.
Does moral muteness slow down efficiency?
Who would be surprised to learn that moral muteness was prevalent at Enron? In fact, you would be hard pressed to find a case where an abundance of moral discourse leads to ethical lapses. Yes, it may slow down efficiency but this may have positive consequences in the long run. Let’s consider the consequences of moral muteness:
What is moral muteness?
Moral muteness is when we communicate in ways that obscure our moral beliefs and commitments, or don’t voice moral sentiments at all.
Who wrote the book Moral Muteness of Managers?
Bird, Frederick B. , and James A. Waters. 1989. The Moral Muteness Of Managers. California Management Review 32 (1): 73-88.
What are the three videos in the Moral Trilogy?
The three videos in the Moral Trilogy Moral Myopia, Moral Muteness (this video), and Moral Imagination are intended to be used together. Moral myopia and moral muteness often reinforce each other, while breaking free of moral myopia and moral muteness can enable one to develop moral imagination.
What did Mary and Robert talk about?
Mary and Robert talked for a few minutes about Casa Tia Maria and its specific needs. Jenny noticed, however, that most of Mary’s answers to Robert’s questions about the shelter’s clients were vague. When Robert said that he was happy to lend a hand to any poor American citizen, Jenny knew he clearly did not understand that immigrants, who were not U.S. citizens, were the shelter’s clientele. Mary said nothing to correct Robert’s misperception.
What are the terms used in ethics?
Terms defined in our ethics glossary that are related to the video and case studies include: conformity bias, diffusion of responsibility, integrity, moral imagination, moral muteness, moral myopia, and obedience to authority.
When push comes to shove, do you prefer to win or be ethical?
The fact of the matter is, when push comes to shove, many people would prefer to win than to be ethical, but this is often a short-term approach that can actually hurt both the individual and the organization in the long term.
Does moral muteness lead to criminal behavior?
However, it is important to emphasize that moral myopia and moral mute ness do not always lead to criminal behavior, and they are not limited to situations that involve breaking the law. This video is a part of the three-video Moral Trilogy package.
Why do people have unethical amnesia?
Researchers from Northwestern University and Harvard University coined the term “unethical amnesia” to describe this phenomenon, which they believe stems from the fact that memories of ourselves acting in ways we shouldn’t are uncomfortable.
What is the difference between ethics and integrity?
Ethics is perceived as the values displayed in your personal life, and integrity is the way you model and apply your values to relationships, parenting, caring and giving. Ethics plus integrity equals morality.
Is moral muteness a threat?
There are costs to moral muteness. In fact, these may be greater a threat than any other risks to harmony, efficiency, power and effectiveness. But, because they’re not as obvious they are often ignored.
Is society immune to moral muteness?
On a whole, our society is slowly but surely becoming immune to violations of moral standards and thus more “tolerant” in a reverse way. This is where activists who are constantly voicing their concerns come in. This is why people like you and I should attempt to educate ourselves on the most pressing issues of our time, to be on the role of “moral witness.” Taking responsibility goes hand in hand with being responsive — and the work to fix it before it becomes too late is a constant one. Letting moral muteness take over the society would be our worst crime.
What is lack of ethics content in management education?
The lack of ethics content in management education is not a new problem but it has remained marginalized as opinion or editorial. This paper seeks to conceptualize the moral muteness of faculty as a phenomenon worthy of scholarly (theoretical) attention. An institutional theory lens is used to examine how a field-wide practice may have evolved from various causes rooted in doctoral training, and is perpetuated when students learn that ethics is unimportant. There may be two ways to overcome the muteness: changes in doctoral training and in accreditation standards.
Why is management education bad?
Many have long criticized management education for poorly training managers to recognize and address ethical and moral issues in the workplace and society . These criticisms point to bad management theories, institutional pressure on business schools and corporations, misdirected pedagogy and an overwhelming reliance on economic rationality in the curriculum. Researchers may not have considered the specific behaviors in the classroom, however, as a cause for poor ethical behavior. For various reasons, faculty members do not express moral considerations on many issues in the classroom. Moral muteness of faculty in management education sends a loud and clear message to aspiring managers that moral considerations are unimportant. An institutional perspective is used to develop the concept of moral muteness of faculty and explain the causes and effects of moral muteness.
