what is a measure of reliability

Full Answer

What factors influence reliability?

Which factors affect the reliability of a product?

1. Poor design. Sometimes the cause for failure may be due to poor design. ...
2. Manufacturing defects and mistakes. For complex products manufacturing may require lots of different steps and processes. ...
3. Quality problems. ...
4. Environmental conditions. ...
5. Overstress. ...
6. Wear. ...

How do you measure reliability and validity?

The reliability and validity of a measure is not established by any single study but by the pattern of results across multiple studies. The assessment of reliability and validity is an ongoing process. Practice: Ask several friends to complete the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

What are the methods of reliability?

Types of Reliability

• Inter-Rater or Inter-Observer Reliability. Whenever you use humans as a part of your measurement procedure, you have to worry about whether the results you get are reliable or consistent.
• Test-Retest Reliability. ...
• Parallel-Forms Reliability. ...
• Internal Consistency Reliability. ...
• Comparison of Reliability Estimators. ...

How do you calculate system reliability?

You can calculate the reliability of the entire system by multiplying the reliability of each of the components together. R system = (R 1 ) (R 2 ) (R 3 ) For an example, if R 1 = .98, R 2 = .85, and R 3 = .97, then the reliability of the system would be:

Why is reliability important?

Why is reliability important? Without it, we don't know what the truth is. If your bathroom scale gives a different weight every time you step on it, how will you know which is the correct weight? The answer is that you won't know.

What is form reliability?

3. Form reliability is when you have two forms of a measure, like two versions of a test or survey.

What does test-retest reliability mean?

Test-retest reliability says that if a person takes a test over and over again, they should get the same result. Remember that Jodie gave the survey to one guy two days in a row. On the first day, the survey showed that he was very racist, while on the next day, it said he wasn't racist at all.

What are the different types of reliability?

Types. There are many types of reliability: 1. Inter-rater reliability is when two scorers give the same answer for one measure. For example, if Jodie and her friend look at the same survey results, they should be able to both mark that survey in the same way.

What is psychological measurement?

Psychological measurement involves measuring a person's psychological traits. In order to measure correctly, the instrument being used should give consistent results, which is known as reliability. There are several main types of reliability: Inter-rater. Test-retest.

When does inter-item reliability occur?

4. Inter-item reliability occurs when different questions on the same measure produce the same results.

Is a bathroom scale reliable?

What's going on with your bathroom scale? It's not reliable at all. Reliability is the extent to which a measure gives consistent results. If your scale gives you a reasonably consistent reading every time you step on it, it is reliable.

How to measure reliability?

The measurement of reliability is conducted in the four most common ways. The traditional approach, as practiced by psychologists, is to measure three types of consistency: 1 Over Time (Test-Retest Reliability) 2 Across Items (Internal Consistency) 3 Across Different Researchers (Inter-Rater Reliability)

What does reliability mean in management?

The meaning of reliable is based on indicators that are consistently and accurately measured and reported.

What is reliability in business?

The meaning of reliability is the very foundation of an organization’s stability, consistency and longevity. To define reliable is critical when it comes to business operations. For a telecoms network company, for instance, it is important to study the performance of their signal towers over some time and in different seasonal conditions.

What is the fourth standard method of measuring reliability?

A fourth standard method of measurement of reliability is Parallel Forms Reliability. It checks for the same or very similar results to define reliable.

When is it good to have high reliability?

Something can be said to have high reliability when it delivers similar results under consistent conditions. In the corporate context, it is useful to analyze the performance of an employee or to see whether a particular business decision is working or not.

Why is it important to collect reliable data?

Collect reliable data. They affect the validity of your measures, and ultimately the integrity of your decisions

When to consider reliability?

It’s important to consider reliability when planning your research design, collecting and analyzing your data, and writing up your research. The type of reliability you should calculate depends on the type of research and your methodology.

Why is reliability important in testing?

Test-retest reliability can be used to assess how well a method resists these factors over time.

What is interrater reliability?

Interrater reliability (also called interobserver reliability) measures the degree of agreement between different people observing or assessing the same thing. You use it when data is collected by researchers assigning ratings, scores or categories to one or more variables.

Why is interrater reliability important?

In an observational study where a team of researchers collect data on classroom behavior, interrater reliability is important: all the researchers should agree on how to categorize or rate different types of behavior.

What is a wound rating scale?

To record the stages of healing, rating scales are used, with a set of criteria to assess various aspects of wounds. The results of different researchers assessing the same set of patients are compared, and there is a strong correlation between all sets of results, so the test has high interrater reliability.

What is the importance of reliability in quantitative research?

When you do quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your research methods and instruments of measurement. Reliability tells you how consistently a method measures something. When you apply the same method to the same sample under the same conditions, you should get the same results.

How to measure parallel forms reliability?

The most common way to measure parallel forms reliability is to produce a large set of questions to evaluate the same thing, then divide these randomly into two question sets.

What is the definition of reliability?

Reliability. refers to the consistency of a measure. Psychologists consider three types of consistency: over time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across different researchers (inter-rater reliability).

What is test-retest reliability?

Test-retest reliability. is the extent to which this is actually the case. For example, intelligence is generally thought to be consistent across time. A person who is highly intelligent today will be highly intelligent next week.

What is criteria validity?

is the extent to which people’s scores on a measure are correlated with other variables (known as ) that one would expect them to be correlated with. For example, people’s scores on a new measure of test anxiety should be negatively correlated with their performance on an important school exam.

When is criterion validity measured?

When the criterion is measured at the same time as the construct, criterion validity is referred to as. concurrent validity. ; however, when the criterion is measured at some point in the future (after the construct has been measured), it is referred to as. predictive validity.

What does it mean when a bathroom scale says you have lost 10 pounds?

As an informal example, imagine that you have been dieting for a month. Your clothes seem to be fitting more loosely, and several friends have asked if you have lost weight. If at this point your bathroom scale indicated that you had lost 10 pounds, this would make sense and you would continue to use the scale. But if it indicated that you had gained 10 pounds, you would rightly conclude that it was broken and either fix it or get rid of it. In evaluating a measurement method, psychologists consider two general dimensions: reliability and validity.

What are the three types of validity?

Here we consider three basic kinds: face validity, content validity, and criterion validity.

What is predictive validity?

predictive validity. (because scores on the measure have “predicted” a future outcome). Criteria can also include other measures of the same construct. For example, one would expect new measures of test anxiety or physical risk taking to be positively correlated with existing measures of the same constructs.

What is reliability in a product?

Reliability is defined as the probability that a product, system, or service will perform its intended function adequately for a specified period of time, or will operate in a defined environment without failure. The most important components of this definition must be clearly ...

What is the difference between quality and reliability?

The difference between quality and reliability is that quality shows how well an object performs its proper function, while reliability shows how well this object maintains its original level of quality over time, through various conditions. For example, a quality vehicle that is safe, fuel efficient, and easy to operate may be considered high ...

Is a car that is fuel efficient and easy to operate considered high quality?

For example, a quality vehicle that is safe, fuel efficient, and easy to operate may be considered high quality. If this car continues to meet this criterion for several years, and performs well and remains safe even when driven in inclement weather, it may be considered reliable.

What is the definition of reliability?

Reliability. Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. Psychologists consider three types of consistency: over time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across different researchers (inter-rater reliability).

How to determine test-retest reliability?

This is typically done by graphing the data in a scatterplot and computing the correlation coefficient. Figure 4.2 shows the correlation between two sets of scores of several university students on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, administered two times, a week apart. The correlation coefficient for these data is +.95. In general, a test-retest correlation of +.80 or greater is considered to indicate good reliability.

What is validity in testing?

Validity is the extent to which the scores from a measure represent the variable they are intended to. But how do researchers make this judgment? We have already considered one factor that they take into account—reliability. When a measure has good test-retest reliability and internal consistency, researchers should be more confident that the scores represent what they are supposed to. There has to be more to it, however, because a measure can be extremely reliable but have no validity whatsoever. As an absurd example, imagine someone who believes that people’s index finger length reflects their self-esteem and therefore tries to measure self-esteem by holding a ruler up to people’s index fingers. Although this measure would have extremely good test-retest reliability, it would have absolutely no validity. The fact that one person’s index finger is a centimeter longer than another’s would indicate nothing about which one had higher self-esteem.

What is inter-rater reliability?

Inter-rater reliability is the extent to which different observers are consistent in their judgments. For example, if you were interested in measuring university students’ social skills, you could make video recordings of them as they interacted with another student whom they are meeting for the first time. Then you could have two or more observers watch the videos and rate each student’s level of social skills. To the extent that each participant does, in fact, have some level of social skills that can be detected by an attentive observer, different observers’ ratings should be highly correlated with each other. Inter-rater reliability would also have been measured in Bandura’s Bobo doll study. In this case, the observers’ ratings of how many acts of aggression a particular child committed while playing with the Bobo doll should have been highly positively correlated. Interrater reliability is often assessed using Cronbach’s α when the judgments are quantitative or an analogous statistic called Cohen’s κ (the Greek letter kappa) when they are categorical.

How to determine internal consistency?

Like test-retest reliability, internal consistency can only be assessed by collecting and analyzing data. One approach is to look at a split-half correlation. This involves splitting the items into two sets, such as the first and second halves of the items or the even- and odd-numbered items. Then a score is computed for each set of items, and the relationship between the two sets of scores is examined. For example, Figure 4.3 shows the split-half correlation between several university students’ scores on the even-numbered items and their scores on the odd-numbered items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The correlation coefficient for these data is +.88. A split-half correlation of +.80 or greater is generally considered good internal consistency.

What does it mean when a bathroom scale says you have lost 10 pounds?

As an informal example, imagine that you have been dieting for a month. Your clothes seem to be fitting more loosely, and several friends have asked if you have lost weight. If at this point your bathroom scale indicated that you had lost 10 pounds, this would make sense and you would continue to use the scale. But if it indicated that you had gained 10 pounds, you would rightly conclude that it was broken and either fix it or get rid of it. In evaluating a measurement method, psychologists consider two general dimensions: reliability and validity.

Why is a high test-retest correlation important?

Again, high test-retest correlations make sense when the construct being measured is assumed to be consistent over time, which is the case for intelligence, self-esteem, and the Big Five personality dimensions. But other constructs are not assumed to be stable over time. The very nature of mood, for example, is that it changes. So a measure of mood that produced a low test-retest correlation over a period of a month would not be a cause for concern.

How do you determine reliability in research?

To determine if your research methods are producing reliable results, you must perform the same task multiple times or in multiple ways. Typically, this involves changing some aspect of the research assessment while maintaining control of the research. For example, this could mean using the same test on different groups of people or using different tests on the same group of people. Both methods maintain control by keeping one element exactly the same and changing other elements to ensure other factors don't influence the research results.

What is research reliability?

Research reliability refers to whether research methods can reproduce the same results multiple times. If your research methods can produce consistent results, then the methods are likely reliable and not influenced by external factors. This valuable information can help you determine if your research methods are accurately gathering data you can use to support studies, reviews and experiments in your field.

Why do researchers use assessments?

To conduct accurate research, these employees often use assessments to determine if their research methods are getting reliable results. You may be interested in learning about how to test for reliability to help you succeed in your role as a researcher. In this article, we define the four types of research reliability assessments, discuss how to test for reliability in research and examine tips to help you get the best results.

Why is parallel form reliability important?

When using parallel forms reliability to assess your research, you may give the same group of people multiple different types of tests to determine if the results stay the same when using different research methods. The theory behind this assessment is that consistent results across research methods ensure each method is looking for the same information from the group and the group is behaving similarly for each test. This means the methods are likely reliable because, if they weren't, the participants in the sample group may behave differently and change the results.

Why do researchers use reliability testing?

Most research jobs use some form of reliability testing to ensure their data is reliable and useful for their employers' purposes. Here are some careers that often test for reliability in data:

How reliable is a test-retest method?

The test-retest reliability method in research involves giving a group of people the same test more than once over a set period of time. In this assessment, the research method and sample group stay the same, but when you administer the method to the group changes. If the results of the test are similar each time you give it to the sample group, that shows your research method is likely reliable and not influenced by external factors, like the sample group's mood or the day of the week.

How to check for internal consistency?

One of those techniques is split-half reliability, and you can perform this test by splitting a research method, like a survey or test, in half, delivering both halves separately to a sample group and comparing the results to ensure the method can produce consistent results. If the results are consistent, then the results of the research method are likely reliable.

How are reliability and validity related?

The concepts of reliability and validity are related. For example, a little thought will satisfy you that measurements can be reliable but not valid, and that a valid measurement must be reliable. But we usually deal with these two concepts separately, either because most researchers study them separately, or because bringing the two concepts together is mathematically difficult. I've had a shot at combining them, but there's much more work to do.

What is retest reliability?

T he most common form of reliability is retest reliability, which refers to the reproducibility of values of a variable when you measure the same subjects twice or more. Let's get down to the detail of how we quantify it. The data below, and the figure, show an example of high reliability for measurement of weight, for 10 people weighed twice with a gap of two weeks between tests. I'll use this example to explain the three important components of retest reliability: change in the mean, typical error, and retest correlation. I'll finish this page with two other measures of reliability: kappa coefficient and alpha reliability.

What is the typical error of a test?

An important form of the typical error is the coefficient of variation : the typical error expressed as a percent of the subject's mean score. For the above data, the coefficient of variation is 2.0%. The coefficient of variation is particularly useful for representing the reliability of athletic events or performance tests. For most events and tests, the coefficient of variation is between 1% and 5%, depending on things like the nature of the event or test, the time between tests, and the experience of the athlete. For example, if the coefficient of variation for a runner performing a 10,000-m time trial is 2.0%, a runner who does the test in 30 minutes has a typical variation from test to test of 0.6 minutes.

How to find the total error of measurement?

You can derive a closely related measure of error simply by calculating each subject's standard deviation, then averaging them. The result is the total error of measurement, which is a form of typical error contaminated by change in the mean. On its own the total error is not a good measure of reliability, because you don't know how much of the total error is due to change in the mean and how much is due to typical error. Some researchers and anthropometrists have used this measure, nevertheless.

How does poor validity affect a study?

Poor validity also degrades the precision of a single measurement, and it reduces your ability to characterize relationships between variables in descriptive studies.

Why is systematic change less reliable?

Systematic change is less of a worry for researchers performing a controlled study, because only the relative change in means for both groups provides evidence of an effect. Even so, the magnitude of the systematic change is likely to differ between individuals, and these individual differences make the test less reliable by increasing the typical error. You should therefore choose or design tests or equipment with small learning effects, or you should get subjects to perform practice (familiarization) trials to reduce learning effects.

Is variation in measurement error?

We talk about variation in measurements as error, but it's important to realize that only part of the variation is due to error in the sense of technological error arising from the apparatus. In fact, in the above example the variation is due almost entirely to biological variation in the weight of the subject. If we were to reweigh the subject with two minutes between weighings rather than two weeks, we'd get pure technological error: the noise in the scales. (We might have to take into account the fact that the subject would be getting slightly lighter all the time, through evaporation or trips to the bathroom.) Measurement error is a statistical term that covers variation from whatever source. It would be better to talk about measurement variation or typical variation, rather than error, but I might have trouble convincing my colleagues...

What does it mean when a measurement is high reliability?

High reliability is one indicator that a measurement is valid. If a method is not reliable, it probably isn’t valid.

What is reliable measurement?

Reliability refers to how consistently a method measures something. If the same result can be consistently achieved by using the same methods under the same circumstances , the measurement is considered reliable.

How are reliability and validity assessed?

Reliability can be estimated by comparing different versions of the same measurement. Validity is harder to assess, but it can be estimated by comparing the results to other relevant data or theory. Methods of estimating reliability and validity are usually split up into different types.

Why do doctors use symptom questionnaires?

A doctor uses a symptom questionnaire to diagnose a patient with a long-term medical condition. Several different doctors use the same questionnaire with the same patient but give different diagnoses. This indicates that the questionnaire has low reliability as a measure of the condition.

What is reliability and validity?

Reliability and validity are concepts used to evaluate the quality of research. They indicate how well a method, technique or test measures something. Reliability is about the consistency of a measure, and validity is about the accuracy of a measure. It’s important to consider reliability and validity when you are creating your research design, ...

What does it mean when a method is valid?

Validity refers to how accurately a method measures what it is intended to measure. If research has high validity, that means it produces results that correspond to real properties, characteristics, and variations in the physical or social world. High reliability is one indicator that a measurement is valid.

Why is validity important?

Validity is harder to assess than reliability, but it is even more important. To obtain useful results, the methods you use to collect your data must be valid: the research must be measuring what it claims to measure. This ensures that your discussion of the data and the conclusions you draw are also valid.

Definition of Reliability

Meaning of Reliability

The Four Types of Reliability

Things to Keep in Mind

Conclusion