what is teleological in philosophy

Full Answer

What does teleological mean in ethics?

teleological ethics, (teleological from Greek telos, “end”; logos, “science”), theory of morality that derives duty or moral obligation from what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved. Utilitarian-type theories hold that the end consists in an experience or feeling produced by the action.

What is teleology in philosophy?

teleology. A philosophy of teleology sees purpose in ends rather than stated causes, making the outcome the actual, or "final" cause. When you see things in terms of teleology, you explain actions by their results. Click to see full answer. Then, what does it mean to be teleological?

What does Teleological theories focus on?

What Does Teleological Ethics Mean? Teleological ethics is a theory according to which the rightness of an act is determined by its outcome. In fact, the word teleological comes from Greek telos, meaning end or goal, and logos meaning science. Thus, teleological theories focus on the consequences of actions; in other words, this theorizes that our actions being morally right or wrong depends on the good or evil generated.

What is teleological ethical system?

The teleological ethical system judges the consequences of the act rather than the act itself. It believes that if the action results in what can be considered as a good consequence, than it must be good and that the end result will justify the reason that the act was committed in the first place.

What is teleological ethics?

Teleological ethics, (teleological from Greek telos, “end”; logos, “science”), theory of morality that derives duty or moral obligation from what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved.

What is the problem with Eudaemonist theories?

The chief problem for eudaemonist theories is to show that leading a life of virtue will also be attended by happiness— by the winning of the goods regarded as the chief end of action. That Job should suffer and Socrates and Jesus die while the wicked prosper, as the Psalmist (73) points out, then seems unjust. Eudaemonists generally reply that the universe is moral and that, in Socrates’ words, “No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death,” or, in Jesus’ words, “But he who endures to the end will be saved.”

Which theory of ethics emphasizes the cultivation of virtue or excellence in the agent as the end of all action?

Teleological theories differ on the nature of the end that actions ought to promote. Eudaemonist theo ries (Greek eudaimonia, “happiness”), which hold that ethics consists in some function or activity appropriate to man as a human being, tend to emphasize the cultivation of virtue or excellence in the agent as the end of all action.

Is the universe moral?

Eudaemonists generally reply that the universe is moral and that, in Socrates’ words, “No evil can happen to a good man, either in life or after death,” or, in Jesus’ words, “But he who endures to the end will be saved.”. Utilitarian theories, on the other hand, must answer the charge that ends do not justify the means.

What is teleology in psychology?

More specifically, Mises believed that human action (i.e. purposeful behavior) is teleological, based on the presupposition that an individual's action is governed or caused by the existence of their chosen ends. In other words, individuals select what they believe to be the most appropriate means to achieve a sought after goal or end. Mises also stressed that, with respect to human action, teleology is not independent of causality: "No action can be devised and ventured upon without definite ideas about the relation of cause and effect, teleology presupposes causality."

Why is teleology used in science?

In modern science, explanations that rely on teleology are often, but not always, avoided, either because they are unnecessary or because whether they are true or false is thought to be beyond the ability of human perception and understanding to judge. But using teleology as an explanatory style, in particular within evolutionary biology, is still controversial.

What is the Greek word for "speak of"?

Etymology. The word teleology combines Greek telos ( τέλος, from τελε-, 'end' or 'purpose') and logia ( -λογία, 'speak of', 'study of', or 'a branch of learning"'). German philosopher Christian Wolff would coin the term, as teleologia (Latin), in his work Philosophia rationalis, sive logica (1728).

What is natural teleology?

Natural teleology, common in classical philosophy, though controversial today, contends that natural entities also have intrinsic purposes, irrespective of human use or opinion. For instance, Aristotle claimed that an acorn's intrinsic telos is to become a fully grown oak tree. Though ancient atomists rejected the notion of natural teleology, teleological accounts of non-personal or non-human nature were explored and often endorsed in ancient and medieval philosophies, but fell into disfavor during the modern era (1600–1900).

What is the definition of finality?

Teleology (from τέλος, telos, 'end', 'aim', or 'goal,' and λόγος, logos, 'explanation' or 'reason') or finality is a reason or explanation for something as a function of its end, purpose, or goal, as opposed to as a function of its cause. A purpose that is imposed by a human use, such as the purpose of a fork to hold food, ...

Where did the term "teleology" come from?

In Western philosophy, the term and concept of teleology originated in the writings of Plato and Aristotle. Aristotle's ' four causes ' give special place to the telos or "final cause" of each thing. In this, he followed Plato in seeing purpose in both human and subhuman nature.

Is teleology a postmodern tradition?

Teleological-based " grand narratives " are renounced by the postmodern tradition, where teleology may be viewed as reductive, exclusionary, and harmful to those whose stories are diminished or overlooked.

What is teleology theory?

Teleology refers to normative theories that emphasize the ends, consequences, or outcomes, e.g. the ends justify the means.

What is teleological view of history?

A teleological view of historical progress is one in which what matters is history’s capacity to move us toward an eventual desired end.

What is the term for the theory of causality?

Teleology is term that derives from Aristotle’s theory of causality. For him there is no simple single cause but four types of causes are needed to explain the final outcome. They are:

What is Aristotle's view of nature?

In his biological research and writings Aristotle set forth his teleological view of nature, that ( for example) organisms developed as they did because they had a natural goal, or what might be called an end or a purpose, it is so to speak programmed within it, (it contains its destiny ( enteletchy ).) The phenomenon in question existed because of the telos, e.g. the temple was build to the end of worshipping a deity, or a goose has webbed feet for the purpose of swimming.

What was the most important cause of Aristotle?

The most important of the four cause for Aristotle was the final (teleological) cause, unless it can be given no causal explanation is valid for Aristotle. The telos is the final end product, the goal of anything either as a definitive end or as designed to fulfill a purpose.

Definition of teleological

Other Words from teleological Did you know? Example Sentences Learn More About teleological

Did you know?

Teleological (which comes to us, by way of New Latin, from the Greek root tele-, telos, meaning "end or purpose") and its close relative teleology both entered English in the 18th century, followed by teleologist in the 19th century.

Examples of teleological in a Sentence

Recent Examples on the Web How else to make sense of a world without any intrinsic narrative, no teleological release? — Emma Cline, The New Yorker, 23 Dec. 2021 From the rally scene on, Ahmed takes it more or less as a given that progress is cyclical, not teleological. — Lily Meyer, The Atlantic, 12 Aug.

What is teleological argument?

Teleological arguments are arguments from the order in the universe to the existence of God. They are also known as arguments from design (or, to be precise, arguments to design).

What are the advantages of modern design arguments over Paley's?

One advantage that this gives modern design arguments over Paley’s is that they are less vulnerable to attacks based on evolution theory. It is an objection to Paley’s argument that evolution can explain the appearance of biological design; evolutionary processes, though, do not apply to the laws of nature.

Is teleological argument a design argument?

Although teleological arguments are often referred to as arguments from design, those who oppose such arguments sometimes object to this. Antony Flew, in particular, has done this, repeatedly and pointedly calling the argument the argument to design. Though he is no longer the vehement critic of the argument that he once was, having recently been persuaded that it might have merit, he continues to be a critic of the common name, insisting that it is it the argument to, not from, design.

What are teleological arguments?

Teleological arguments (or arguments from design) by contrast begin with a much more specialized catalogue of properties and end with a conclusion concerning the existence of a designer with the intellectual properties (knowledge, purpose, understanding, foresight, wisdom, intention) necessary to design the things exhibiting the special properties in question. In broad outline, then, teleological arguments focus upon finding and identifying various traces of the operation of a mind in nature’s temporal and physical structures, behaviors and paths. Order of some significant type is usually the starting point of design arguments.

What are some teleological arguments for God's existence?

Some phenomena within nature exhibit such exquisiteness of structure, function or interconnectedness that many people have found it natural to see a deliberative and directive mind behind those phenomena. The mind in question is typically taken to be supernatural.

What is resultant theistic argument?

The resultant theistic arguments, in their various logical forms, share a focus on plan, purpose, intention, and design, and are thus classified as teleological arguments (or, frequently, as arguments from or to design).

What is Hume's theory of the cosmos?

Indeed, whereas advocates of design arguments frequently cited similarities between the cosmos on the one hand and human machines on the other, Hume suggested (tongue perhaps only partly in cheek) that the cosmos much more closely resembled a living organism than a machine.

Overview

Teleology (from τέλος, telos, 'end', 'aim', or 'goal,' and λόγος, logos, 'explanation' or 'reason') or finality is a reason or an explanation for something which serves as a function of its end, its purpose, or its goal, as opposed to something which serves as a function of its cause. A purpose that is imposed by a human use, such as the purpose of a fork to hold food, is called extrinsic.
Natural teleology, common in classical philosophy, though controversial today, contends that nat…

History

Modern philosophy

Economics

Postmodern philosophy

Ethics

Science

See also