As emperor, Diocletian was faced with many problems. His most immediate concerns were to bring the mutinous and increasingly barbarized Roman armies back under control and to make the frontiers once again secure from invasion. His long-term goals were to restore effective government and economic prosperity to the empire.
What problems did the Roman Empire face after Diocletian became emperor?
Although the worst of the damage was repaired by the emperor Aurelian, by the time Diocletian was declared emperor, Rome was still facing internal rebellions, barbarian incursions, and multiple claimants to the throne. The Roman Empire had become a shaky shell of its former self.
What was Diocletian’s biggest challenge?
Diocletian’s biggest challenge was dealing with the structural problems that had brought the empire to its knees. He more than doubled the number of provinces, which were in turn broken into groups of 12 dioceses, and four prefectures.
What happened to Diocletian after Aper's death?
With the death of Aper, however, Diocletian was relieved of an eventual competitor and, retroactively, his act had been granted sacred meaning. Acclaimed emperor on November 17, 284, Diocletian possessed real power only in those countries that were dominated by his army (i.e., in Asia Minor and possibly Syria ).
What would have happened to Constantine without Diocletian’s reforms?
It’s possible that without Diocletian’s reforms, Constantine would not have had an empire worth conquering and converting. But cast in terms of the economic well-being of most of the empire’s citizens, Diocletian’s policies collided with the limits of top-down control again and again.
See more
What was bad about Diocletian?
Diocletian revoked the legal rights of Christians, trying to encourage his citizens back to a more traditional worship of the old Roman gods. He razed churches and destroyed religious scriptures, and went even further to prohibit Christian's from even gathering to worship.
What happened during the reign of Diocletian?
Diocletian secured the empire's borders and purged it of all threats to his power. He defeated the Sarmatians and Carpi during several campaigns between 285 and 299, the Alamanni in 288, and usurpers in Egypt between 297 and 298.
How did Diocletian weaken the Roman Empire?
At the urging of the caesar Galerius, in 303 Diocletian began the last major persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire, resulting in the destruction of churches and the torture and execution of Christians who refused to sacrifice to the Roman gods.
Was Diocletian a good person?
Diocletian was a formidable emperor who ended a period of turmoil for the Roman world. Known as a great reformer with a harsh personality, he garnered respect where others failed miserably. Born in 244, in the Balkans, Diocletian grew up in turbulent conditions with little government or stability.
What is Emperor Diocletian best known for?
Diocletian was first and foremost a soldier, but he made reforms not only in the Roman military but also in its financial system, administration, religion, architecture, and changed rules of ruling the Empire. One of the most important achievements of Diocletian was the “tetrarchy” – ruling of four.
Why did Diocletian split empire?
Diocletian understood that a major problem in ruling a territory of the extent of the Roman Empire was its immense size. It was far too large to be ruled by just one person, so one of the first actions taken by the new emperor was to split the empire into two parts.
What caused the fall of the Roman Empire?
Invasions by Barbarian tribes The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.
How was the Roman Empire divided by Diocletian?
Explanation: The Roman Empire was divided into an eastern half and a western half in 285 CE by the Emperor Diocletian. It was the Emperor Constantine in 330 CE, however, who moved the capital of the Roman Empire to Byzantium (Constantinople), in the Eastern Roman Empire.
When did Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
286 CEIn 286 CE, the Emperor Diocletian decided to divide Rome into two sections to try and stabilize the empire. For 100 years, Rome experienced more divisions and in 395, it finally became The Western Empire and The Eastern Empire. This division changed Roman life and government forever.
How did Diocletian try to solve the problem of choosing a new emperor?
By instituting his Tetrarchy, Diocletian also hoped to solve another problem. In the Augustan Principate, there had been no constitutional method for choosing new emperors. According to Diocletian's plan, the successor of each Augustus would be the respective Caesar, who then would name a new Caesar.
Which two economic factors lead to the downfall of the Roman Empire?
Greed and Taxation Led to the Fall of Rome.
Why is Diocletian important?
As Roman emperor for more than 20 years (284–305 CE), Diocletian brought stability, security, and efficient government to the Roman state after nea...
What was Diocletian’s religion?
Diocletian was an adherent of the traditional Roman religion involving worship of the pantheon of deities including Jove (Jupiter), Mars, Apollo, a...
What did Diocletian do to Christians?
At the urging of the caesar Galerius, in 303 Diocletian began the last major persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire, resulting in the destru...
Inheriting a Bad Situation
During the Crisis of the Third Century, Rome essentially split into three states: the Gallic Empire in the West, the Palmyrene Empire in the East, and Rome proper, centered in Italy.
Answer and Explanation
Diocletian came to power in Rome at the end of the Crisis of the Third Century. The Crisis of the Third Century almost saw the collapse of the Roman Empire due to economic collapse and a de facto split of the empire into several rump states.
What was Diocletian's policy?
On the fiscal side, Diocletian’s policies could fairly be labeled as tax-and-spend. He unleashed the imperial state’s torrential new bureaucracy on finding out just who everyone in the empire was (through a census) and calculating exactly how much they owed the government.
What was Diocletian's only action that isn't still a part of our political and economic?
Diocletian’s only action that isn’t still a part of our political and economic debate today is the wide menu of price controls , and even those would have neatly fit in the five-year plans of some states less than a century ago. Knowing the full consequences of Diocletian’s reforms is difficult, since that snub of Constantius’ son quickly led to more civil war, the retaking of the empire by one man, a massive shift in the balance of religious power, and a new imperial capital.
What did Diocletian do to the price ceiling?
Still battling inflation, Diocletian went into full commander mode: if merchants kept raising prices, impose price ceilings by the sword. The Edict on Maximum Prices, published in 301, attempted to set price ceilings for over 900 goods and wages for 130 occupations. At first the edict closed businesses, caused shortages, and sparked unrest. It was ultimately mostly ignored.
Why did the Tetrarchy end?
The tetrarchy was also supposed to bring an end to the corrosive wars of succession that plagued Rome during the Crisis of the Third Century. But the state apparatus carefully put in place by Diocletian and his associates likely made imperial power even more attractive. Constantine, the son of co-emperor Constantius, was snubbed in a handoff of power within the tetrarchy. That, of course, led to the end of both the tetrarchy and large-scale Christian persecution in the empire.
How many bureaucrats did Diocletian have?
Historian Warren Treadgold estimates that Diocletian doubled the number of government bureaucrats from 15,000 to 30,000. He doubled the number of provinces in the empire (giving rise to the dioceses around which the Catholic Church still organizes today).
How many imperial robes did Diocletian inherit?
The world Diocletian inherited was staggering out of the Crisis of the Third Century, a 50-year period that saw 26 claimants to the imperial robes, most of whom seemed guided by nothing more than personal greed and ambition.
What did Diocletian's reforms show?
However, just like the most well-intentioned large-scale state interventions today, Diocletian’s reforms ultimately showed the futility of attempting to create a healthy society by edict. We see the assumption especially among today’s political left that a more powerful central government staffed with the right people will heal society’s ills.
What happened to the Roman Empire when Diocletian got sick?
Suddenly, under this system, the vast territory of the Roman empire looked somewhat manageable. However, when Diocletian got sick, he gave up his power and the Tetrarchy immediately turned on itself and the Empire had a massive Civil War.
How many weaknesses did Diocletian have?
In my opinion Diocletian had 4 major weaknesses.
How long did Diocletian live after his abdication?
He died 4 years after the abdication, after witnessing all the carnage of his failed succession plan. Overall Diocletian is up there on the short list of best emperors ever. However, arguably his most fatal weakness, the creation of the Tetrarchy, is why he never tops the charts. 1.5K views. ·.
How many emperors were in the Tetrarchy?
The tetrarchy tried to solve the civil wars, it consisted of four emperors, each in charge of a part of the empire. There were two seniors (Diocletian and Massimian) and two juniors (Galerius and Constant). The idea was that when a senior died or be too old (Diocletian and Maximian were the only two emperors that abandoned the role after twenty years), the junior would take his place and a new junior elected. The sistem worked quite well for more than twenty years, basically on Diocletian’s prestige. After it collapsed. Still this gave twenty years to recover.
Why did the Tetrarchy come into existence?
He also introduced the Tetrarchy, a clever solution to the age-old problem of succession. On paper it was likely meant to help share the work load , the Empire was to big to be ruled effectively by one man. So instead there would be a group of Emperors, and every ten years the two senior Emperors would retire to make room for new rulers.
Why did Diocletian's equestrian class become hereditary?
Certain occupations became hereditary, such as farming, baking and carpentry, in order to try to prevent skills/food shortages.
What was Diocletian's greatest weakness?
Finally we get to what is Diocletian's greatest weakness, his inability to create a stable succession system after his death.
What was Diocletian's biggest challenge?
Diocletian’s biggest challenge was dealing with the structural problems that had brought the empire to its knees.
How did Diocletian rise to power?
Diocletian’s rise to power was typical of this period. He was a strong military commander, popular with his troops, and was proclaimed emperor by his legions in Nicomedia (modern Turkey) in 284. Diocletian knew that being proclaimed emperor was incredibly dangerous; the vast majority of emperors were assassinated not long after they were raised. He had to act quickly to build a power base.
What did Diocletian wear?
Diocletian took a different approach. He wore a diadem, a symbol of royalty emperors never dared to wear. His subjects were required to kneel in his presence. Rigid court ceremonial was introduced, such as kissing the hem of the emperor’s robe.
What did Diocletian believe about the Roman gods?
He believed the turn away from Jupiter and the other Roman gods, who traditionally protected the state, might have led to divine disfavor. Diocletian had a reputation for brutality. When he laid siege to a usurper emperor in Egypt, he asked that his men keep killing until blood came up to the knees of his horse.
What happened to the silver coins of Diocletian?
Many successive emperors debased the coinage further. Eventually, the silver content was reduced to a thin wash on the outside of the coin. By the time Diocletian came to the throne a barter economy had become the norm in many places.
Why was Diocletian considered a tyrant?
Diocletian’s rule had a dark side. The emperor was seen as a tyrant by many people, not least because he hated the growing sect of Christians in his empire. He was concerned with stability; he wanted to root out the causes of Roman decline. Religious reasons were top of his list.
Why is Diocletian called the dominating?
Diocletian’s rule, and the period that followed it, is sometimes referred to as the dominate, because of the authoritarian character of the monarchy at this time.
How did Diocletian bring order into the economy?
Diocletian sought to bring order into the economy by controlling wages and prices and by initiating a currency reform based upon a new gold piece, the aureus, struck at the rate of 60 to the pound of gold. The controls failed and the aureus vanished, to be succeeded by Constantine’s gold solidus. The latter piece, struck at the lighter weight ...
Who was Diocletian's coemperor?
He associated with himself a coemperor, or Augustus. Each Augustus then adopted a young colleague, or Caesar, to share in the rule and eventually to succeed the senior partner.
What is the definition of consistent policy in imperial affairs?
The definition of consistent policy in imperial affairs was the achievement of two great soldier-emperors, Diocletian (ruled 284–305) and Constantine I (sole emperor 324–337), who together ended a century of anarchy and refounded the Roman state . There are many similarities between them, not the least being the range of problems to which they addressed themselves: both had learned from the 3rd-century anarchy that one man alone and unaided could not hope to control the multiform Roman world and protect its frontiers; as soldiers, both considered reform of the army a prime necessity in an age that demanded the utmost mobility in striking power; and both found the old Rome and Italy an unsatisfactory military base for the bulk of the imperial forces. Deeply influenced by the soldier’s penchant for hierarchy, system, and order, a taste that they shared with many of their contemporaries as well as the emperors who preceded them, they were appalled by the lack of system and the disorder characteristic of the economy and the society in which they lived. Both, in consequence, were eager to refine and regularize certain desperate expedients that had been adopted by their rough military predecessors to conduct the affairs of the Roman state. Whatever their personal religious convictions, both, finally, believed that imperial affairs would not prosper unless the emperor’s subjects worshiped the right gods in the right way.
How did the Empire prosper?
The empire’s economy had prospered in a spotty fashion. Certain provinces, or parts of provinces such as northern Italy, flourished commercially as well as agriculturally. Constantinople, in particular, influenced urban growth and the exploitation of agricultural frontiers. Balkan towns along the roads leading to the great city prospered, while others not so favoured languished and even disappeared. Untilled land in the hilly regions of northern Syria fell under the plow to supply foodstuffs for the masses of Constantinople. As the 4th century progressed, not only did Constantine’s solidus remain indeed solid gold, but evidence drawn from a wide range of sources suggests that gold in any form was far more abundant than it had been for at least two centuries. It may be that new sources of supply for the precious metal had been discovered: those perhaps were in spoils plundered from pagan temples or perhaps were from mines newly exploited in western Africa and newly available to the lands of the empire, thanks to the appearance of camel-driving nomads who transported the gold across the Sahara to the Mediterranean coastline of North Africa.
What was the soldier's penchant for hierarchy, system, and order?
Deeply influenced by the soldier’s penchant for hierarchy, system, and order, a taste that they shared with many of their contemporaries as well as the emperors who preceded them, they were appalled by the lack of system and the disorder characteristic of the economy and the society in which they lived.
What were Constantine's policies?
Some of them—notably hereditary succession, the recognition of Christianity, the currency reform, and the foundation of the capital— determined in a lasting way the several aspects of Byzantine civilization with which they are associated. Constantine II.
How many people were in Constantinople in the 5th century?
Constantinople had probably grown to a population of between 200,000 and 500,000; in the 5th century the emperors sought to restrain rather than promote its growth.
Is Four Greater Than One?
Economist in Chief
- Stephen Guerra, host of the History of the Papacypodcast, reminds us that Diocletian’s worldview was likely molded by his time as a general. Applying that logic to Rome’s economy, he tried to order people and merchants to make the economic decisions he thought best. The analogy is a telling one. The entire structure of a military, including its suppression of individual freedom, is g…
Battling History
- What to make of the fact that Diocletian’s policies resonate so deeply in our debate 1,700 years later? Earle notes that Diocletian had essentially no economic theory at his disposal. On the contrary: With 2,000 years of recorded history between the 3rd-century calamities of the Roman Empire and the present day — plus a handful of recent, well-documented economic crackups per…
Epilogue
- Whether by design of his tetrarchic system or due to illness, in 305 Diocletian became one of Rome’s only emperors to abdicate and retire. He settled in his massive palace whose ruins are still prominent in the modern-day city of Split, Croatia to do what any former god-like ruler would do: he raised cabbages and other vegetables in his garden. As ...